Re: replying privately/thanks for info!

[Guest guest]

shron6-@... wrote:

Thanks to Terry and Ronny; I never knew what the "Source" feature

meant, so I wasn't aware that I even had that option! Like I said, I

usually just never responded to anyone individually since I didn't have

a way to do so. Now that I do know, I will be able to! Thanks to you

both again, and my apologies to all as I continue to "learn the ropes!"

Blessings,

Sharon in Nashville aka "Beep"

sharon-palmer@... / ICQ #3840221

Recently dx'd with ACM / possible SM

original article:/group/chiari/?start=23356

> At 10:46 AM 9/8/1999 -0700, shron62@... wrote:

> > > I only get the list on the web, and I do not get complete email

addys

> >this way; the last character of the addy is always missing. How do

I reply

> >privately in this instance?

> > We realise it's inconvenient lately to "respond to sender only" from

the

> egroups site. We've been trying to figure out a way around this. In

the

> meantime, you should keep individual wacma members in your address

book for

> such occasions - and do what Terry suggested for the ones who aren't

in

> your book.

> > We're sorry for the inconvenience, but the situation is not a

legitimate

> excuse to send private mail to all 650 members. > We'll get the "respond to sender" feature back as soon as we can.

> > ronny

> World ACM Association http://www.pressenter.com/~wacma