Re: Cosmic science

[Guest guest]

As I am too old n handicapped to answer yr reasonable question, I suggest u read my bk THE HEAVENS DECLARE! The shortest I can say, is that perhaps our solar system is a hologram n that any moment in time affects the entire....A does not influence B, A n B are like a pantograph n operate simultaneously.

To bed!

Remember I was a sceptic in 1944 n considered astrology [cosmic science] "superstitious twaddle for nincompoops"!

love

ao.

By the way,"the way each of us is likely to process experience" does not address the "why" question. A better question, were the hypothesis to be proved, would be *how* disembodied a priori astrological 'actuality' works to capture and anticipate a differentiation of embodied cognitive processing.

It would be an easy research design to execute. Your assertion is close to the form required to make predictions. And, it's in a form falsifiable too.

regards,

[Guest guest]

Alice, all,Since you are providing us all with prolix and subtle and profound Credos, I tend to discount the effects of your infirmities as they might bear on what wasn't a question, but was, nevertheless, basic.

My opinion is astrology has to be an aspect of a cosmic science. I have no idea what would constitute a worthwhile, even if speculative, treatment. What I latched onto was your simple assertion of a naturalistic correlation, between cognition and astrological quality. Since this implied a compelling experiment, all I'm rhetorically suggesting is this is, oddly, not so compelling that an astrologer ever has done the darn experiment. This would only be a preliminary experiment in any case. The " how " has not yet been offered in any form amenable to naturalistic experiment.

regards,