Guest guest Posted September 9, 2003 Report Share Posted September 9, 2003 That is one arguement of low carbing... ketones and the tear down on body but how often does this really happen? That is the ADA's ongoing argument against low carbing... protein *can* ruine kidneys and Bernstein has shown medically with his research/patients that high bgs is what ruines kidneys, not protein consumption. Dr. Bernstein and his patients never experience this at all. Bernstein states, then keep reading for a link to this chapter from his book to keep reading it, that... If you are a long-standing diabetic and are frustrated with the care you've received over the years, you have probably been conditioned to think that protein is more of a poison than sugar and is the cause of kidney disease. I was conditioned the same way—many years ago, as I mentioned, I had laboratory evidence of advanced proteinuria, signifying potentially fatal kidney disease—but in this case, the conventional wisdom is just a myth. Nondiabetics who eat a lot of protein don't get diabetic kidney disease. Diabetics with normalized blood sugars don't get diabetic kidney disease. High levels of dietary protein do not cause kidney disease in diabetics or anyone else. There is no higher incidence of kidney disease in the cattle-growing states of the United States, where many people eat steak every day, than there is in the states where beef is more expensive and consumed to a much lesser degree. Similarly, the incidence of kidney disease in vegetarians is the same as the incidence of kidney disease in nonvegetarians. It is the high blood sugar levels that are unique to diabetes, and to a much lesser degree the high levels of insulin required to cover them (causing hypertension), that cause the complications associated with diabetes. *** and the link to the article/chapter of his book watch for word wrap *** http://www.diabetes-normalsugars.com/readit/chapter9.shtml Low carbohydrate diets: > This is what quackwatch has to say about low carbohydrate diets: > http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/lcd.html > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2003 Report Share Posted September 9, 2003 The author of quackwatch.org Dr. Barrett has the following to say about nutrition, " People should eat about 60% carbs, 25% fat, and 15% protein. " The above quote is one taken directly from a biography interviewer as found in a link on his web page. Low carbohydrate diets: > This is what quackwatch has to say about low carbohydrate diets: > http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/lcd.html > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2003 Report Share Posted September 9, 2003 Thanks for the information as stated by Dr. Bernstein. I will conduct a test of Dr. Barrett to see if he is on the level. I will submit Dr. Bernstein's quotes to Dr. Barrett and see what he has to say about Dr. Bernstein's theory. Dr. Barrett reports that he answers quack complaints promptly. I don't know what he means by promptly, but I am about to find out. Low carbohydrate diets: > > > > This is what quackwatch has to say about low carbohydrate diets: > > http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/lcd.html > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2003 Report Share Posted September 9, 2003 Harry notice he said people in this quote and not diabetics... " People should eat about 60% carbs, 25% fat, and 15% protein. " No where does he mention this should be for diabetic consumption. However, the ADA would probably applaud him LOL. He probably has no exposure to long term diabetic research in improving bgs control by low carbing or diabetic complications caused from low carbing. However, Bernstein has over 15 years of proven patient research that low carbing doesn't effect diabetics, it is the high bgs that effects it. I just hate to see docs spouting off numbers and worst case scenarios trying to put fear in people without taking into account Bernstein's, and other endos following the low carb approach, findings or those diabetics on low carb diets with good bgs etc. and their research is laced with *can* or *could* clear through it to breed fear without long term patient research behind it. It's like the articles that scream don't eat nutra sweet or you'll get cancer and how many die from drinking diet pepsi? Just my two sense... Low carbohydrate diets: > > > > This is what quackwatch has to say about low carbohydrate diets: > > http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/lcd.html > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2003 Report Share Posted September 9, 2003 You may be right about Dr. Barrett. In fact I think you are right on. I notice that Dr. Barrett frowns upon vitamin and mineral supplements in general and in fact believes that any vitamin intake over the FDA's RDA (recommended daily allotment) should be mandated as a drug. This would give more power to M. D.'s to start making money by prescribing vitamins that exceed the RDA. I found only one reference link where he recommended vitamins and amino acids and that was regarding homosystein levels in the blood. He did recommend Vitamin B6 and Vitamin B12 and Folic acid for the treatment under medical supervision for elevated homosystein levels. Oh, in another link he also recommended niacin for the treatment of elevated cholesterol levels, also. Low carbohydrate diets: > > > > > > > This is what quackwatch has to say about low carbohydrate diets: > > > http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/lcd.html > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2003 Report Share Posted September 9, 2003 , How long have you been a diabetic? Low carbohydrate diets: > > > > This is what quackwatch has to say about low carbohydrate diets: > > http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/lcd.html > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2003 Report Share Posted September 9, 2003 are you on an ace enhibetor? Low carbohydrate diets: > > > > > > > This is what quackwatch has to say about low carbohydrate diets: > > > http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/lcd.html > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2003 Report Share Posted September 9, 2003 Just from my own experience, , I agree with Dr. Berstein. From many years of non-compliance to a good diabetic diet, I have developed proteniuria and a creatinine level of 1.9. However, since I have been watching it and keeping my A1C around 6, neither the protein has increased nor has the creatinine level increased. For someone who has been diabetic as long as I have, docs are amazed I am in as good shape as I am in.I intend to stay that way! (P.S. " normal " creatinine is up to 1.5) Re: Low carbohydrate diets: That is one arguement of low carbing... ketones and the tear down on body but how often does this really happen? That is the ADA's ongoing argument against low carbing... protein *can* ruine kidneys and Bernstein has shown medically with his research/patients that high bgs is what ruines kidneys, not protein consumption. Dr. Bernstein and his patients never experience this at all. Bernstein states, then keep reading for a link to this chapter from his book to keep reading it, that... If you are a long-standing diabetic and are frustrated with the care you've received over the years, you have probably been conditioned to think that protein is more of a poison than sugar and is the cause of kidney disease. I was conditioned the same way—many years ago, as I mentioned, I had laboratory evidence of advanced proteinuria, signifying potentially fatal kidney disease—but in this case, the conventional wisdom is just a myth. Nondiabetics who eat a lot of protein don't get diabetic kidney disease. Diabetics with normalized blood sugars don't get diabetic kidney disease. High levels of dietary protein do not cause kidney disease in diabetics or anyone else. There is no higher incidence of kidney disease in the cattle-growing states of the United States, where many people eat steak every day, than there is in the states where beef is more expensive and consumed to a much lesser degree. Similarly, the incidence of kidney disease in vegetarians is the same as the incidence of kidney disease in nonvegetarians. It is the high blood sugar levels that are unique to diabetes, and to a much lesser degree the high levels of insulin required to cover them (causing hypertension), that cause the complications associated with diabetes. *** and the link to the article/chapter of his book watch for word wrap *** http://www.diabetes-normalsugars.com/readit/chapter9.shtml Low carbohydrate diets: > This is what quackwatch has to say about low carbohydrate diets: > http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/lcd.html > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2003 Report Share Posted September 9, 2003 Does this doctor take diabetes in consideration? This 60% may be good for a non-diabetic or for someone who does a lot of exercise, but it is not good for a diabetic! (Unless the diabetic does a whole lot of exercise directly after eating). Re: Low carbohydrate diets: The author of quackwatch.org Dr. Barrett has the following to say about nutrition, " People should eat about 60% carbs, 25% fat, and 15% protein. " The above quote is one taken directly from a biography interviewer as found in a link on his web page. Low carbohydrate diets: > This is what quackwatch has to say about low carbohydrate diets: > http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/lcd.html > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2003 Report Share Posted September 9, 2003 you go girl! smile Low carbohydrate diets: > > > > > > > This is what quackwatch has to say about low carbohydrate diets: > > > http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/lcd.html > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2003 Report Share Posted September 9, 2003 Harry, I have been diabetic 59 years-I will be 61 in November. Re: Low carbohydrate diets: , How long have you been a diabetic? Low carbohydrate diets: > > > > This is what quackwatch has to say about low carbohydrate diets: > > http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/lcd.html > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.