Guest guest Posted July 30, 1999 Report Share Posted July 30, 1999 Hi Group, I would like to hear some feedback re: an OP/Industrial setting here (owned by a PT) in MI which utilizes a PT to cover for OT patients while the OT is off or on vacation. (while continuing to bill for OT services) I know my feelings about this, but would be interested in hearing some discussion. Sue Chapin, OTR Chapinsm@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 1999 Report Share Posted July 30, 1999 Without specific orders for PT, that practice is illegal in Michigan (no direct access for treatment) unless the PT is functioning as an OT " Assistant " which is a very Very questionable practice. Turn them in and get them out of my profession. BTW, I am a PT in Michigan. At 09:02 PM 7/30/99 , you wrote: >Hi Group, > >I would like to hear some feedback re: an OP/Industrial setting here (owned >by a PT) in MI which utilizes a PT to cover for OT patients while the OT is >off or on vacation. (while continuing to bill for OT services) I know my >feelings about this, but would be interested in hearing some discussion. > >Sue Chapin, OTR >Chapinsm@... > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >eGroups.com home: /group/ptmanager > - Simplifying group communications > > > R. Kovacek, MSA, PT Email Pkovacek@... 313 884-8920 Visit <www.PTManager.com> TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 1999 Report Share Posted July 31, 1999 This is potentially both a violation of the PT and OT Practice Acts. The PT looks to be practicing without PT orders, and billing fraud is another issue. The individual(s) need to be reported to their respective licensure/registration boards in Lansing at the DCIS, and the payor(s) might like to hear about this practice as well. Filing a compliant with the PT Licensure Board is simple, and more should do it when they come across a situation like this. I can share my thoughts, and contacts, with you off-list if you choose , PT Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan dperrypt@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 1999 Report Share Posted July 31, 1999 Regardless of the law and practice acts, the bottom line from the outside view is greed. What a sad thing! Lundy, MS, PT, PCS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 1999 Report Share Posted July 31, 1999 I would add one more consideration to Dave's and 's comments. There is one way only to do this legally. You need more than a PT referral or " orders " . The PT also has to evaluate the patient and establish a plan of care. The PT can not just " cover " for the OT by just continuing with the OT's Rx plan. However, while what I just described may be legal I do have a big philosophical problem with this concept. PT and OT are not interchangeable. The closest we get is in hand therapy and despite what the ASHT says, and does, there are differences btwn the two professions. Chapinsm@... wrote: > Hi Group, > > I would like to hear some feedback re: an OP/Industrial setting here (owned > by a PT) in MI which utilizes a PT to cover for OT patients while the OT is > off or on vacation. (while continuing to bill for OT services) I know my > feelings about this, but would be interested in hearing some discussion. > > Sue Chapin, OTR > Chapinsm@... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > eGroups.com home: /group/ptmanager > - Simplifying group communications Attachment: vcard [not shown] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 1999 Report Share Posted July 31, 1999 This situation brings up a good question of whether one " should report " versus " must report " potential violators of practice acts? In developing the Model Practice Act for physical therapy we felt this area was generally one of significant weakness in most practice acts. Therefore, the model language recommends language mandating reporting of violations, or potential violations, of a practice act. Several states have already adopted mandatory reporting clauses in their practice acts. This means that someone with knowledge of a violation of their practice act but fails to report it to their board would also potentially have grounds for disciplinary action. There are also APTA ethical standards that further support the concept of not ignoring violations of law and reporting them in the interest of public protection and professional integrity. Blair J. Packard, PT President, Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy wrote: original article:/group/ptmanager/?start=6684 > This is potentially both a violation of the PT and OT Practice Acts. The PT > looks to be practicing without PT orders, and billing fraud is another issue. > The individual(s) need to be reported to their respective > licensure/registration boards in Lansing at the DCIS, and the payor(s) might > like to hear about this practice as well. > Filing a compliant with the PT Licensure Board is simple, and more should do > it when they come across a situation like this. I can share my thoughts, and > contacts, with you off-list if you choose > , PT > Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan > dperrypt@... > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 1999 Report Share Posted July 31, 1999 Blair, So right you are, that violations must be reported. Too many times those aware look the other way, or don't want to get involved. The offender may be removed from working in one setting, but moves on to another. I am still awaiting the final conclusion of a case I reported 3 1/2 years ago. But the hearing is coming up in 2 weeks, and hopefully the offender will be put out of action...again. , PT dperrypt@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 1999 Report Share Posted August 1, 1999 Blair is exactly right in referring to the Code of Ethics: Principle 7: " Physical therapists accept the responsibility to protect the public and the profession from unethical, incompetent, or illegal acts. 7.1: Consumer Protection A. Physical therapists shall report any conduct that appears to be unethical, incompetent, or illegal. Quoted from the APTA Code of Ethics Note the word " Shall. " There does not seem to be much choice in this word. As I teach ethics and the law to our entry level students, they take these responsibilities very seriously, and are appalled that in California, the ethics committee of the state chapter so rarely deals with serious issues very sternly. If we are to market ourselves successfully for our " rightful " and necessary (necessary for the public) place in the coming millennium, we must assure the public that the physical therapy profession practices legally and ethically. this takes monitoring of our own, by our own. Tough stuff, but then we have taken on an awesome responsibility in becoming physical therapists! I urge each of you to review the language of the Code of Ethics at least annually (it makes for a very interesting inservice discussion). Dale Avers Dale Avers, PT, MSEd Mount St. 's College 12001 Chalon Road Los Angeles, CA 90049 FAX Doctoral Candidate Instructional Systems Technology Indiana University >>> 07/31/99 07:44AM >>> This situation brings up a good question of whether one " should report " versus " must report " potential violators of practice acts? In developing the Model Practice Act for physical therapy we felt this area was generally one of significant weakness in most practice acts. Therefore, the model language recommends language mandating reporting of violations, or potential violations, of a practice act. Several states have already adopted mandatory reporting clauses in their practice acts. This means that someone with knowledge of a violation of their practice act but fails to report it to their board would also potentially have grounds for disciplinary action. There are also APTA ethical standards that further support the concept of not ignoring violations of law and reporting them in the interest of public protection and professional integrity. Blair J. Packard, PT President, Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy wrote: original article:/group/ptmanager/?start=6684 > This is potentially both a violation of the PT and OT Practice Acts. The PT > looks to be practicing without PT orders, and billing fraud is another issue. > The individual(s) need to be reported to their respective > licensure/registration boards in Lansing at the DCIS, and the payor(s) might > like to hear about this practice as well. > Filing a compliant with the PT Licensure Board is simple, and more should do > it when they come across a situation like this. I can share my thoughts, and > contacts, with you off-list if you choose > , PT > Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan > dperrypt@... > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/ptmanager - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.