Guest guest Posted December 31, 2007 Report Share Posted December 31, 2007 Colleagues, the following is FYI and does not necessarily reflect my own opinion. I have no further knowledge of the topic. If you do not wish to receive these posts, set your email filter to filter out any messages coming from @nutritionucanlivewith.com and the program will remove anything coming from me. Soy Isoflavone Supplementation Attenuates Bone Loss of the Spine http://www.vitasearch.com/CP/weeklyupdates/ Reference: " Soy isoflavone intake increases bone mineral density in the spine of menopausal women: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, " Ma DF, Qin LQ, et al, Clin Nutr, 2007 Dec 4; [Epub ahead of print]. (Address: Pei-Yu Wang, Department of Social Medicine & Health Education, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100083, PR China. E-mail: wpeiyu@... ). Summary: In a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials evaluating the effects of soy isoflavone intake on spine bone mineral and/or spine bone mineral content, isoflavone supplementation was found to exert a significant protective effect. The reviewers identified 10 studies which involved 608 subjects which were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to subjects who did not consume soy isoflavones, those that did experienced a 20.6 mg/cm(2) increase in spine bone mineral density. Compared to placebo, soy isoflavone intake increased spine bone mineral content by 0.93 g. When subjects consumed more than 90 mg/d of soy isoflavones, spine bone mineral density increased by 28.5 mg/cm(2). When subjects received soy isoflavones for six months, spine bone mineral density increased by 27 mg/cm(2). The authors conclude that, " Isoflavone intervention significantly attenuates bone loss of the spine in menopausal women. " The greatest benefits are found when soy isoflavones are consum ed in amounts more than 90 mg/day, and when supplementation continues for at least 6 months. Dr. R. B. Singh Halberg Hospital and Research Institute Civil Lines, Moradabad, 10 (UP) 244001, India icn2005@... 0437 (TEL/FAX) http://www.vitasearch.com/CP/experts/RBSinghAT10-31-07.pdf " Effect of Carni Q-gel (Ubiquinol and Carnitine) on Cytokines in Patients with Heart Failure in the Tishcon Study, " Acta Cardiol, 2007; 62(4): 349-54. 45731 (12/2007) Kirk Hamilton: Can you please share with us your educational background and current position? R. B. Singh: After passing MBBS from Institute of Medical Sciences, Benaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India, I specialized in internal medicine from this great Institute. I also studied biochemistry and nutrition in relation to digoxin toxicity in heart failure patients for my MD thesis. I have published about 25 research papers in the Am Heart J, Brit Heart J, Acta Cardiol, Lancet and in several Indian journals from 1974 to 1977. I presented a novel concept of hyperlipidemia in tuberculosis at the 5th International Congress on Atherosclerosis at Houston, Texas USA in 1979 and also did a clinical rotation at the Ashington Hospital, Ashington, UK in the same year. I established the Medical Clinics and Hospital at Moradabad, India as Director of this center and continued research in nutrition in cardiovascular disease, resulting in 330 publications presently. I have been Professor of Medicine at Subharti Medical College, Meerut since 2004 and am now the Director of the Halberg Hospital and Research Institute, Moradabad, India and Fellow at the Halberg Chronobiology Centre, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, USA. KH: What got you interested in studying the role of ubiquinol and carnitine in heart failure patients? RBS: Since both the agents help in the energy production in the mitochondria, which is depleted in heart failure, it seems logical to consider better results with their combined use. These agents have been used independently by us, and other experts, in treating acute coronary syndromes and heart failure with beneficial effects. Therefore, we considered it possible that their combined use might be significantly synergistic and clinically better. KH: Why did you choose hydrosoluble ubiquinol (reduced form) versus CoQ10 as ubiquinone (oxidized form)? What is the reported advantage to using ubiquinol? Where did you come up with the dose of 270 mg/d? Was it given in a single dose or divided dose? With meals or away from meals? RBS: We used hydrosoluble ubiquinol because of its extraordinary bioavailability and bioactivity. The dosage was determined from earlier studies among heart failure patients showing maximum beneficial effects between 200-300mg/d of ubiquinol. We administered 3 soft gel capsules three times daily of Carni-Qgel (Tishcon Corp), immediately after meals or with fatty foods as CoQ10 is better absorbed due to its solubility in fat. KH: Why did you choose to give L-carnitine with ubiquinol? Why did you choose L-carnitine versus other forms of carnitine? Where did you come up with the dose of 2250 mg/d? How was it given? With the ubiquinol? With meals or without? In a single dose or divided dose? RBS: Both the agents were combined in a hydrosoluble soft gel capsule, which was administered with meals as mentioned above. The dosage and form of L-carnitine was used because of its high bioactivity and superior beneficial effects on ejection fraction and quality of life compared to other forms of carnitine in patients with heart failure in earlier studies. KH: Were CoQ10 levels taken before during or after this study? Did they correlate with symptoms and supplementation? RBS: Yes, plasma CoQ10 was studied at baseline and after 12 weeks of follow up, showing a 10 fold increase in its levels in the intervention group with a modest increase in the placebo group. The quality of life, visual analogue scale revealed that dyspnea, palpitations and fatigue (NYHA class II-IV heart failure) which were present at rest in all the patients at baseline, showed beneficial effects in the intervention group compared to the placebo group. The six-minute walk test also showed that there was a significantly greater benefit in distance walking from baseline, in the intervention group than the placebo group. KH: Were plasma carnitine levels assessed? Did they correlate with symptoms and supplementation? RBS: We did not do so because we did not consider it necessary. KH: Can you tell us about your study and the basic results? RBS: As mentioned above, our study indicated that treatment of heart failure, with ubiquinol + L-carnitine can cause a marked improvement in the quality of life parameters and NYHA class II-IV heart failure. There was a significant reduction in the proinflammatory cytokines that are neurohumoural precursors, related to sympathetic and parasympathetic activity which is impaired in patients with heart failure. We are not aware of any other study showing reduction in cytokines with either of the agents used by us. KH: Were there any side effects with the L-carnitine and ubiquinol combination therapy? How was the patient compliance? RBS: Nausea and vomiting are common side effects with CoQ administration in Indian patients but these were controlled by antiemetics and antacids. The compliance was excellent. KH: I have use ubiquinone at 300-600 mg per day from this same company and there has never been nausea or emesis. Is this do to the carnitine or the reduced form of CoQ10 ubiquinol or their combination? RBS: I think patients with heart failure are different than those subjects having no heart failure because in heart failure, there may be congestion of the stomach and liver enlargement causing gastritis which predisposes them to nausea and vomiting. KH: How can you be sure that ubiquinone in combination with L-carnitine would not have the same beneficial effect as ubiquinol and L-carnitine? There has been a lot of publicity about this reduced form of CoQ10 (ubiquinol) being so much more efficacious than the oxidized form of C0Q10 (ubiquinone). Is ubiquinol worth the increased attention? How do we know which is better? Can you comment on the efficacy between the two? RBS: Randomized, controlled intervention trials with both combinations would be necessary to answer your question regarding which combination of the different forms of CoQ10 with carnitine is better. KH: Who is a candidate for carnitine and ubiquinol therapy? All heart failure patients? Why not if there is no harm? RBS: Yes, all the patients with heart failure of all etiologies. KH: Do you have any opinion yet of the advantage of hydrosoluble ubiquinol versus ubiquinone? RBS: Yes, research has shown that ubiquinol is definitely more efficacious than ubiquinone. KH: Do you have any further comments you would like to make about this very interesting and clinically relevant subject? RBS: If funds are available, we would like to prove the synergistic effects of this combination by administering them independently and combined in various groups. We would also like to confirm the effects on cytokines as this is the first study showing these beneficial effects. I am pleased to congratulate especially; Drs Adarsh Kumar (patient care) and Dr Manoj Saxena (cytokine assay) as well as other coauthors; Drs Niaz, Joshi, Chattopadhya, Mechirova, Pella and Fedacko f or their help in this work. It was not possible to conduct this study without financial and technical support from Mr. Raj Chopra, Kamal Chopra and Patels of Tishcon Corporation, Westbury, NY, USA. -- ne Holden, MS, RD < fivestar@... > " Ask the Parkinson Dietitian " http://www.parkinson.org/ " Eat well, stay well with Parkinson's disease " " Parkinson's disease: Guidelines for Medical Nutrition Therapy " http://www.nutritionucanlivewith.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.