Guest guest Posted June 1, 2000 Report Share Posted June 1, 2000 Does anyone know if not hiring someone because they have PSC is considered discrimination? My husband went on a job interview and up until the guy (an acquaintance of his) found out that he had a liver disease, he was told that the job was basically a sure thing. Now the guy is balking and saying he has some " thinking " to do. My husband is in the early stages of the disease and up until last year had been reimbursed at the end of the year for unused sick time. Last year he did use all his sick days, but didn't need any extra. The job he is going for is with the same parent company that he works for now (has been with this company for 10 years), but is a different sub company. He has an excellent work record and comes highly recommended. He has no limitations etc. It could just be an odd coincidence that the guy is balking on the job after finding out about his PSC. I guess maybe it's partially my husband's fault because he is very open about the disease and doesn't mind talking about it. What makes the situation unusual is that under normal cirmcumstances he probably wouldn't haven't even mentioned it, but since he had worked with this guy in the past and is friends with his brother, he was a little more open about it. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2000 Report Share Posted June 1, 2000 I have been in a similar situation, although I am the caregiver. I am in a business where everyone knows everyone! What fun! I feel bad for your husbands situation, that has to be upsetting. I pray they will give him a chance. But...if there is no proof, he may need to move on. If he does not get this job, he will need to get an employment agreement for his next job to protect him. I hate to say this, but tell him to not say a word. As long as he is capable of working, there is no need for them to know about his condition if it will not effect his preformance (at this time). Example: employer had employee with them for 2 years doing a great job, the employer is not going to fire them if they come down with cancer! If he can work, so be it!!!! Another senirio.....health ins. cost to employers! There are millions of ins. companies, who knows how bad the " employer " could get dinged and effect the benefits of the rest of the employees if someone in the company had a serious med problem. To finish my speach (haha) I learned the hard way. Went to interview for a job in my field, I have a great work reputation, knew the person hiring...but that person knew of my husbands situation. Didnt get the job, go figure. I know that they thought I would miss work all the time (which I dont) worried about ins., etc. So I went to a place where no one knew my family situation! My husband was upset, he said, NEVER tell a potential employer about me (which I didnt, they knew already). End of story Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2000 Report Share Posted June 1, 2000 My husband Mitch had a big job offer 6 months ago. We wrestled with the ethics of not telling or telling his future employer. We decided it would be not in his best interest to tell as he felt fine. THe only illness (other than legal dissabilities ) is AIDS. Aids is now covered as a " dissability " . I am sure you can find out if any other diseases are covered in the federal governments web sites. Unfortunately, most people think of liver disease as alchohol induced. ie: you gave it to yourself. My husband and I are very careful about how we explain his disease and always include it is not alchohol related. Of course, people are going to think all kinds of weird things when you say liver disease. Most people don't have a clue about what you are talking about. Should you tell if you have aids, heartburn, headaches, the list could go on forever! The only way you can get insurance in this country is to keep working! My husband has tried to go out on his on to work as a consultant and was turned down by all insurance companies when he tried to get individual coverage. So don't even think about telling because you will so screw yourself. Until our insurance woes are straigtened out in the USA then most people will have to continue to hide their medical problems from employers, this is just the awful truth. Just try to get insurance on your own after having this disease. It is a disgrace that my husband who has never used the insurance until now, will be denied future coverage now that he needs them. (unless of course you go to a large group coverage, which means you will have to work even when you don't feel like it (unless the well spouse has got you covered under his/her plan.) So if you are single, then you could really be screwed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2000 Report Share Posted June 1, 2000 jkosiorek@... wrote: > > Does anyone know if not hiring someone because they have PSC is considered > discrimination? Yes, I think it is. As long as his condition doesn't keep him from performing the job requirements (they're even supposed to make reasonable accomodations if necessary), then they aren't supposed to take it into consideration. At least that's how I understand it. On the other hand it would probably be difficult to prove that's why they didn't hire him, and even if you could it could end up being a long court battle. One thing that might be key is whether they specifically asked him about his health or not. Legally, all an interviewer is supposed to be able to ask regarding health is whether the candidate has a condition that would keep them from performing the job requirements. athan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2000 Report Share Posted June 2, 2000 I have read the posts on discrimination. I too feel the need to tell a potential employer about , simply because I may have to be off work a lot. Which because of the fact that he is not allowed to drive (due to seizures) I have to take him to his appointments. Perhaps others don't have this problem but I do. I think that I missed out on a job because of that but my current employer knew the situation when they hired me. However, now that there are changes going on (2 of the Doctors are opening their own practice) my future here is uncertain. I primarily work in the 2 doctor's offices that are leaving the practice. And the head honchos haven't figured out what they are going to do. They don't necessarily have to keep me on and the other 2 don't necessarily have to hire me on. So, I am on a job hunt again, probably back in the city, where the pay is better. This means I will have to move closer in but I WILL NOT live in the city ever again. So do you all think I should be up front with potential employers or not? Because I am the driver, caregiver, etc., I feel like I need to tell the truth but I don't know. Anyway, just wanted some opinions. Thanks, Spring Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2000 Report Share Posted June 2, 2000 I feel you should only protect your family and that means not being upfront with your future employers. I feel I am a very ethical person and consider myself having high moral standards. But you must consider the state of our insurance coverage disaster situation in the USA. Millions of people are unable to get coverage. THis is the major cause of bankruptcy in the USA. (the government will lead you to think it is the over spending of greedy consumers) the fact is having medical bills that you cannot pay r puts more people in bankruptcy that any other single cause. You cannot sit around worrying about " the company " . Americans do not realize how bad the insurance industry has screwed up getting medical care. We prefer to spend our taxes on the military and other wasteful things, while continuing the march to lesser medical care than any other major industrialized nation. Even Costa Rica has better medical care for its people than the USA. You must be looking out for you, your family and your loved ones, not worrying about being honest with your employer, . First of all you even utter the word liver disease, without giving a whole medical course, and companies automactically think alcholol abuse! You do not want your employer to even go there. So why bother educating them when you are trying to protect your family, not spend your time educating people. Spend your energy where you are going to need it, on your family. This is the moral thing to do: protect your family and loved ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2000 Report Share Posted June 2, 2000 I too would feel bad not telling an employer who depends on you to be there. But I think once they tell you they will hire you -- once the decision has been made -- than you can say oh by the way I am a care giver and will need time off once in a while but promise not to take advantage of you. You have told them the truth and than they can except you or change their minds. Probably because the decision has been made to hire you they will stick with it. Barb Re: Discrimination >I have read the posts on discrimination. I too feel the need to tell a >potential employer about , simply because I may have to be off work a >lot. Which because of the fact that he is not allowed to drive (due to >seizures) I have to take him to his appointments. Perhaps others don't have >this problem but I do. I think that I missed out on a job because of that >but my current employer knew the situation when they hired me. However, now >that there are changes going on (2 of the Doctors are opening their own >practice) my future here is uncertain. I primarily work in the 2 doctor's >offices that are leaving the practice. And the head honchos haven't figured >out what they are going to do. They don't necessarily have to keep me on and >the other 2 don't necessarily have to hire me on. So, I am on a job hunt >again, probably back in the city, where the pay is better. This means I will >have to move closer in but I WILL NOT live in the city ever again. So do you >all think I should be up front with potential employers or not? Because I am >the driver, caregiver, etc., I feel like I need to tell the truth but I don't >know. Anyway, just wanted some opinions. > >Thanks, >Spring > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2000 Report Share Posted June 5, 2000 Well said !! <I feel you should only protect your family and that means not being upfront with your future employers.> I feel that because America is basically run by " corporate " America and they are the ones getting the big tax breaks, they should foot the bill for our insurance. My two cents, Eileen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.