Guest guest Posted December 31, 2003 Report Share Posted December 31, 2003 wrote: > > Nonverbal language predated humans, and primates for that > > matter. It was necessary then. It isn't now; we have something > > better. Nonverbal language is like the appendix now, or the > > vestigial feet in boa constrictors. And Jane responded: > > That's an odd thing to say. Nonverbal language (or rather, > > inability to do it) is what gets many auties fired from their jobs. > > It keeps many auties from being hired in the first place. It's what > > keeps auties longing for friends and/or romance alone in their > > lives. It gets some auties locked up (by cops or docs). > > My appendix never did any of that to me. and countered: > You have to take what I wrote in context. I mean that nonverbal > language no longer serves a useful purpose, now that we have > something better. It is a vestige of our nonverbal heritage, evol- > utionarily and in the early days of the species. It's an idea whose > time has come and gone. It may not serve much purpose to you, or most aspies, but I think that NTs still use it to great effect. They use it all the time, whether or not you notice, to denote when someone is doing/saying something odd, when they are angry with someone, kids roll their eyes when their parents begin an oft-heard speech. And nonverbal language includes body language too. All NTs give off hundreds, perhaps thousands of nonverbal messages each day, and one of the primary areas where it is practiced is in the romantic department. Every interested look, every smile, every upturned eyebrow, every sucked-in gut, all these things and more are little message packets, and are read by the intended person as such. No offense, but many aspies either don't see, recognize, or understand these messages. Trust me, it's not a dying language. Clay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2003 Report Share Posted December 31, 2003 Jane Meyerding wrote: > > ...Nonverbal language predated humans, and primates for that > > matter. It was necessary then. It isn't now; we have something > > better. Nonverbal language is like the appendix now, or the > > vestigial feet in boa constrictors. > > That's an odd thing to say. Nonverbal language (or rather, inability > to do it) is what gets many auties fired from their jobs. It keeps > many auties from being hired in the first place. It's what keeps > auties longing for friends and/or romance alone in their lives. It > gets some auties locked up (by cops or docs). > > My appendix never did any of that to me. You have to take what I wrote in context. I mean that nonverbal language no longer serves a useful purpose, now that we have something better. It is a vestige of our nonverbal heritage, evolutionarily and in the early days of the species. It's an idea whose time has come and gone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 > > > ...whether in the world of NTs or in this mythical version > > of the world where autistics somehow reproductively overrun > > the NTs. > > " Somehow " makes it sound really improbable, but it seems > likely that the population is already becoming saturated > with autistic genes. Many people have the recessive gene > for autism, but it doesn't surface until those genes are > reinforced by the other partner. This is why there seems to > be an " epidemic " of it just now. It was barely known fifty > years ago, and now it's on everyone's lips, and they're > hysterical about it. The rush is on to reproduce, before > they make it illegal to do so, or find a way to detect us > in the womb. Make love, not war! 8<{) > > Clay Off the top of my head, I tend to agree with most of this. What really worries me is the fact that " the rush is on " to teach the young spectrumites that autistic behavior is, itself, inherently " sociopathic " or " bad " (or whatever term might apply), thus effectively alienating them from their true identity on basis of " autism = bad " . (Obvious, yes, but ...) It is the long-term effects of this that really give me the screaming heebie-jeebies. Specifically, it will be that self-alienation which WILL lead to the very " sociopathic " behavior that intervention purports to " correct " . But the effect will them be *blamed* on autism itself---NOT on the imposed self-alienation (emotional abuse) which led to the " bad " behavior. The effect of this will be that the " autism = bad " view will have much more ample (though inherently false) " eveidence " that autism itself is responsible for " bad " , and even criminal, behavior. Obviously, this will lead to exacerbation of the anti-autistic backlash presently being fostered by the ABA/curebie crowd. In short, by compulsively botching their own cause/effect logic, they will create a " self-fulfilling prophecy " which will further endanger all of us. Now, the real big-picture is obviously a bogglingly complex set of dynamics, so anything could happen. And I certainly hope things don't unfold as I am predicting here. But frankly, this scenario worries the hell out of me when I consider the long-term " prognosis " for autism in society, to say nothing of the more " short-term " consequences for today's autistic children and adults. I hope I've done justice to my point here. It's a pretty loopy set of individual and social dynamics, so it's hard to explain clearly, and impossible to grasp for those who want " simple " rationalizations for everything they feel like doing. But to me, this is yet another example of how " folk morality " could easily destroy some of the most inherently benign human beings in existence. But don't tell Digby Tantam I said that! :-O Here's hoping for the best. We're gonna need it. :-\ Dave March Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 > > > If you can figure out a way that I can do that without having to ever > > see or interact with the kid, or pay any money for its upkeep, let me > > know. > > Sperm donation? > > Pah! You're no fun at all! (j.k.) :-) --DKM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 Yeah, I know the feeling. I was taught that " stimming = lack of 'poise' " . Once I realized what stimming was, I invested in Silly Putty and have been playing with it whenever my hands need something to do. It's important to teach that autism isn't bad, just different. It's also useful to teach what is expected, although that may be debatable. For example, the whole " eye contact " thing, proper posture, that stimming is distracting to others, etc. There's nothing inherently wrong with faking NT for short periods of time. There is great harm in telling people that how they are naturally is inherently wrong, and that they have to fake NT for the rest of their lives. The problem I think most of the new generation will face is the same problem that faced Jefferson - the need for " a more universal aquantence. " The problem is that it's easy enough to give us a life-long love of learning, and to introduce us into the joys of knowing things. Our natural ability to perseverate gives us the natural curiosity which drives the learning process. However, being in an evironment where others are there only by force, and who decide to make the lives of those who see school as a place of learning into hell, makes many see school as hell. I mean, who cares about the War of 1812 when your battles are with people better coordinated, more violent, and more able to lie convincingly than you? Overt violence and psychological " we hate you " is enough to make any student *loath* school with a passion. That doesn't encourage good study habits, or even a desire for life-long education. The educational process itself becomes mucked-up with layer upon layer of psychological shit. I don't know if isolation is the key. As a child, I was quite likely to believe " the rule is " meant that things were that way and that was so. Good behavior would simply be a set of expectations, which would be easy enough to follow once they were established. I don't know if having an autists-only educational system would actually work... if everyone would be a good rule-follower and turn the educational process into a joy, rather than a lesson in pain. The advice Norm Ledgin gives in his book " Diagnosing Jefferson, " is to drop out at age 16, get a GED, and go straight to college. It really doesn't matter that you're not socially equipped to deal with people a few years older than you... if you're like me you won't be socially equipped *anyway* when the " right time " comes. In college, since everyone who is going there is paying to be there and actually *wants* to be there, you're not going to suffer any shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 Kaiden Fox wrote: > For example, the whole " eye contact " thing, proper > posture, that stimming is distracting to others, etc. There's > nothing inherently wrong with faking NT for short periods of time. I tend to disagreeme with this. It serves to reinforce the notion that other people's comfort is more important than ours. It also hides us from others, which prevents them from being forced to deal with it, and get used to it-- like they did with the blacks, for example. Whites had to get used to having them around, which won't happen if they don't appear to be around. As such, I would rather make a special effort to be visibly autistic in public than to hide it. > In college, > since everyone who is going there is paying to be there and actually > *wants* to be there, you're not going to suffer any shit. This is not true. My late friend Shane found that the people he met at Sangamon State University in Springfield, Illinois, were more abusive to him than those in high school. Many of the people that tormented me in middle and high school were people that wanted to be there, not the delinquents in training that would rather be somewhere else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 > I tend to disagreeme with this. It serves to reinforce the notion > that other people's comfort is more important than ours. It also > hides us from others, which prevents them from being forced to deal > with it, and get used to it-- like they did with the blacks, for > example. Whites had to get used to having them around, which won't > happen if they don't appear to be around. > As such, I would rather make a special effort to be visibly > autistic in public than to hide it. I agree with here, with the caveat that pragmatics can overrule ideals at times. and I, and others on SSI/SSD (I don't know what on earth I'm on now, but it pays more than SSI for once), and others who can't *help* not passing, we have much less to lose by being openly autistic than many other people do. This doesn't mean I advocate passing or that I think *anyone* should have to pass, only that if it saves your life to pass briefly in public, I don't think that's condemnable. I think it is remarkable when any autistic is openly and blatantly autistic in public, but I think it is all the more remarkable from people who, *unlike* and me, could lose everything they've got by doing it. That said, I think my part as someone who *doesn't* have a lot to lose is to be openly and unashamedly autistic in public to pave the way for those later, in a time where hopefully (in part because of our efforts) people will have a lot *less* to lose for being themselves. But I can't blame people who don't want to die (which, while it's a potential consequence of passing, is also a potential consequence of *not* passing) for trying to pass in some situations. I am just angered by the fact that the rest of the world promotes that crap and makes it necessary for people to hide who they are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2004 Report Share Posted January 3, 2004 Kaiden Fox wrote: >Yeah, I know the feeling. I was taught that " stimming = lack of 'poise' " . >Once I realized what stimming was, I invested in Silly Putty and have been >playing with it whenever my hands need something to do. > I haven't tried that lately, but I probably will (particularly since some appeared in the xmas stocking). Some of my favorites: Dancing (best full-body stim there is) Giving massage Swinging up-side-down on an inversion bar. Petting a cat (purrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr) Stealthy stims: twirling one's feet around at the ankle (when seated) kindof a circular pattern thing involving my abdominal muscles >It's important to teach that autism isn't bad, just different. It's also >useful to teach what is expected, although that may be debatable. For >example, the whole " eye contact " thing, proper posture, that stimming is >distracting to others, etc. There's nothing inherently wrong with faking NT >for short periods of time. There is great harm in telling people that how >they are naturally is inherently wrong, and that they have to fake NT for >the rest of their lives. > We can't do it anyway, though some make themselves crazy trying. > >The problem I think most of the new generation will face is the same problem >that faced Jefferson - the need for " a more universal aquantence. " The >problem is that it's easy enough to give us a life-long love of learning, >and to introduce us into the joys of knowing things. Our natural ability to >perseverate gives us the natural curiosity which drives the learning >process. However, being in an evironment where others are there only by >force, and who decide to make the lives of those who see school as a place >of learning into hell, makes many see school as hell. I mean, who cares >about the War of 1812 when your battles are with people better coordinated, >more violent, and more able to lie convincingly than you? Overt violence >and psychological " we hate you " is enough to make any student *loath* school >with a passion. > The War of 1812 is an interesting example to bring up in this context. Britain was far more powerful than the US at that time, and they clobbered us militarily and burned down our capital. The only sense in which we can claim to have " won " that war is that we survived it (and rebuilt our Capitol out of less flammable materials). I made it through middle and high school on sheer masochism. >That doesn't encourage good study habits, > What really prevented me from developing good study habits was that school was way too easy, academically. I was at the top of my class with very little effort. All of that changed when I got to MIT, where I had to actually study hard for the first time. The environment was totally different too, nobody gets bullied for being a nerd at MIT! It was the first place I ever seemed to fit in at all. Ride the Music AndyTiedye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2004 Report Share Posted January 5, 2004 Andy, You hang upside down in your house? How do you not break your wall? I would ruin the plaster. > > >but have to have the " perfect " atmosphere. " > For years, my " perfect atmosphere " was the Grateful Dead. That It is free-form, > there > is no wrong way to > do it. If you can do it for hours at a time, so much the > better! > > There is something about dancing all night under the stars, way out > in > the forest somewhere > with a few hundred other happy people. Rave? Hmmmmmmmm Yeah well...Minus the ecstacy drug attached to some of those scenes I would go for it.Sounds freeing KIM ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2004 Report Share Posted January 5, 2004 D Tucker wrote: >Andy, You hang upside down in your house? How do you not break your wall? >I would ruin the plaster. > It mounts in a doorframe. The brackets take six screws. There is also a freestanding table version, you can hang up-side-down in that too, if you don't think your doorframes are sturdy enough or you don't want to drill any holes. http://www.relaxtheback.com/global/product/pg_subcategory.cfm?TID=90581721407800\ 0405016449 & CFID=41172140 & CFTOKEN=250405013 & Site=main & TreeID=1913/global/product/\ pg_subcategory.cfm?TID=905817214078000405016449 & CFID=41172140 & CFTOKEN=250405013 & \ Site=main & TreeID=1913 >>There is something about dancing all night under the stars, way out >>in the forest somewhere >>with a few hundred other happy people. >> >> > >Rave? > >Hmmmmmmmm > >Yeah well...Minus the ecstacy drug attached to some of those scenes I >would go for it. > It is not actually required that one take ecstacy at a rave, especially if one is hyperactive and on the spectrum. In my case it would be redundant. The combination of stimming and sensory overload from dancing at a rave works better for me than any drug, and I'm usually still dancing when most of the candy kids have run out of steam. It does help make the NTs who take it less NT, at least for a few hours, and my natural wierdness looks sufficiently similar to what they are used to that they are not put off by it. Far from it. I am sometimes asked for " some of whatever you are on " . >Sounds freeing >KIM > IT IS! Ride the Music AndyTiedye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 6, 2004 Report Share Posted January 6, 2004 Re: Bugs & Karmann Ghias--So did my Dad! My fave was his green Karmann Ghia convertible. There was also the VW bus too-red & white. The Beetle was red. Man, what memories!!! sigh.... ; > ) http://community.webtv.net/tikigalharkins/LETSTALKASPERGERS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 andy tiedye > It mounts in a doorframe. The brackets take six screws. > > There is also a freestanding table version, you can hang > up-side-down in > that too, That's batty But I rent and I'd be Screwed, pardon that pun. KT ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 D Tucker wrote: >andy tiedye > > > >>It mounts in a doorframe. The brackets take six screws. >> >>There is also a freestanding table version, you can hang >>up-side-down in >>that too, >> >> > >That's batty > >But I rent and I'd be Screwed, pardon that pun. > The guy I bought mine from rents too. I don't know if he even bothered to patch the holes when he moved. Screw-holes in a doorframe shouldn't be too much of an issue, and if they are, they are easy to patch. Alternatively, you can get an inversion table, which is free-standing, but still allows you to hang up-side-down. Ride the Music AndyTiedye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.