Guest guest Posted January 30, 2011 Report Share Posted January 30, 2011 i also want to comment that i have purchased the lyme and co-infection frequencies and have found that the co-infection frequencies in particular have been effective. it is good, however, to do muscle testing to find the frxs that are having an effect. good website. thanks, janet To: Lyme_and_Rife From: its_just_talk@...Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:13:07 -0800Subject: DNA Frequencies - feedback To add to my last message, in all fairness to Char Boehm and her "DNA" frequencies, I will say that I do not have much feedback regarding their efficacy in treating Lyme and co's. There is a blogger who has other good information, who thinks highly of them. You can read his comments, here: http://www.alternativetherapyadvice.com/alternative_therapy/determine_frequencies_therapy.htm Scroll down the center column on the above webpage, to see his remarks about the DNA frequencies. Anyone interested can research further. Coil users who do not herx from the known effective frequencies, might consider purchasing the DNA frequencies. But not herxing from the known effective frequencies, could be due to various factors that the DNA frequencies would not address, such as dormant disease (from use of antimicrobials), misdiagnosed disease, etc. Again, I know almost nothing about the DNA frequencies. I was exposed to high pressure promotion of them on the rife forum board, which did put me off. They could work well for conditions other than Lyme and co's - I don't know. But the premise behind them is truly beyond my scope. - Jane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2011 Report Share Posted January 31, 2011 Hi Janet, I am glad that you found these frequencies helpful, because I talked to a lot of people who purchased them who did not see them as beneficial, including some of our most seasoned rifers. I had considered buying them at one time too, but I don't want to buy them if they are not helpful and I don't like the idea that Charlotte Boehm makes you sign a paper promising not to share them. I feel that once I purchase them, they are mine to do with as I please. > > > > > > i also want to comment that i have purchased the lyme and co-infection frequencies and have found that the co-infection frequencies in particular have been effective. it is good, however, to do muscle testing to find the frxs that are having an effect. good website. thanks, janet > > > > > > > > To: Lyme_and_Rife > > From: its_just_talk@ > > Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:13:07 -0800 > > Subject: DNA Frequencies - feedback > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To add to my last message, in all fairness to Char Boehm and her " DNA " frequencies, I will say that I do not have much feedback regarding their efficacy in treating Lyme and co's. There is a blogger who has other good information, who thinks highly of them. You can read his comments, here: > > http://www.alternativetherapyadvice.com/alternative_therapy/determine_frequencie\ s_therapy.htm > > > > Scroll down the center column on the above webpage, to see his remarks about the DNA frequencies. Anyone interested can research further. > > > > Coil users who do not herx from the known effective frequencies, might consider purchasing the DNA frequencies. But not herxing from the known effective frequencies, could be due to various factors that the DNA frequencies would not address, such as dormant disease (from use of antimicrobials), misdiagnosed disease, etc. > > > > Again, I know almost nothing about the DNA frequencies. I was exposed to high pressure promotion of them on the rife forum board, which did put me off. They could work well for conditions other than Lyme and co's - I don't know. But the premise behind them is truly beyond my scope. > > > > - Jane > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2011 Report Share Posted February 1, 2011 Below is an email " conversation " I had with C. Boehm regarding the DNA frequencies. I wanted to make sure my Doug coil could handle them so I asked for the range. It is important to understand how many species of Bb there are, and that it is likely very important that you have the right DNA frequency for the species you are infected with. From some testing I would imagine (W. Blot) it could be almost impossible to tell which species one is infected with. I have not tried them yet. Not sharing the frequencies is a matter of intellectual property rights and if I spent 8 years in college to get a PhD I would be pretty insistant in selling my work for money. Consider the restrictive rules around sharing screenings of " Under Our Skin " for example. I think we are really lucky that Ninah Silver and others have been so open in sharing their research and frequencies. Also note that the frequencies are mathematically derived and are not tested on live spirochetes. Consider also the different types of Rife machines, their voltage and the " skin effect " which can limit frexs. to skin only. I recently had a great experience with a small laser that also transmits frequencies. They are used widely in Europe and India, just not in the US. The light based (plasma?) frequencies have a deeper tissue penetration according to my physical therapist. She sees injuries heal in half the normal time. Tue, August 31, 2010 11:40:02 AMRe: CPS - Contact Form View Contact To: Macatangay -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi , According to my understanding, lyme was not (and is not) such a big problem in the Rocky Mountains, especially back in 76-82. So your onclination is probably more on target. Borrelia afzelii is another European species. My frequencies are not based on in vivo case studies, but on a mathematical formula related to the DNA of the pathogen. You can find that information at the website in the 1999 paper. However, there are some case studies presented there as well, which were also given as evidence to the patent office. Best wishes, Charlene Boehm, manager cpsBioResearch, LLC DNA Frequencies - feedback > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To add to my last message, in all fairness to Char Boehm and her " DNA " frequencies, I will say that I do not have much feedback regarding their efficacy in treating Lyme and co's. There is a blogger who has other good information, who thinks highly of them. You can read his comments, here: > > > http://www.alternativetherapyadvice.com/alternative_therapy/determine_frequencie\ s_therapy.htm > > > > > > Scroll down the center column on the above webpage, to see his remarks about the DNA frequencies. Anyone interested can research further. > > > > > > Coil users who do not herx from the known effective frequencies, might consider purchasing the DNA frequencies. But not herxing from the known effective frequencies, could be due to various factors that the DNA frequencies would not address, such as dormant disease (from use of antimicrobials), misdiagnosed disease, etc. > > > > > > Again, I know almost nothing about the DNA frequencies. I was exposed to high pressure promotion of them on the rife forum board, which did put me off. They could work well for conditions other than Lyme and co's - I don't know. But the premise behind them is truly beyond my scope. > > > > > > - Jane > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2011 Report Share Posted February 1, 2011 i do use a machine that i haven't heard anyone else use on this forum. i use the pulsed technology P3. it is a plasma machine. the website is pulsedtech.com the technology is cutting edge and it was pretty pricey. the frequencies go up to 100,000. janet To: Lyme_and_Rife From: scdlymie@...Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:28:08 +0000Subject: DNA Frequencies - feedback Janet,Can you tell us which machine you used the DNA frequencies on that was effective for you? Thanks.Sherry>> > i also want to comment that i have purchased the lyme and co-infection frequencies and have found that the co-infection frequencies in particular have been effective. it is good, however, to do muscle testing to find the frxs that are having an effect. good website. thanks, janet> > > > To: Lyme_and_Rife > Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:13:07 -0800> Subject: DNA Frequencies - feedback> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To add to my last message, in all fairness to Char Boehm and her "DNA" frequencies, I will say that I do not have much feedback regarding their efficacy in treating Lyme and co's. There is a blogger who has other good information, who thinks highly of them. You can read his comments, here:> http://www.alternativetherapyadvice.com/alternative_therapy/determine_frequencies_therapy.htm> > Scroll down the center column on the above webpage, to see his remarks about the DNA frequencies. Anyone interested can research further.> > Coil users who do not herx from the known effective frequencies, might consider purchasing the DNA frequencies. But not herxing from the known effective frequencies, could be due to various factors that the DNA frequencies would not address, such as dormant disease (from use of antimicrobials), misdiagnosed disease, etc. > > Again, I know almost nothing about the DNA frequencies. I was exposed to high pressure promotion of them on the rife forum board, which did put me off. They could work well for conditions other than Lyme and co's - I don't know. But the premise behind them is truly beyond my scope.> > - Jane> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2011 Report Share Posted February 1, 2011 I guess this is one more reason for me not to use the DNA frequencies at this time. They have not been tested on live Spirochetes and I question Charlotte's methods at arriving at these frequencies so quickly without any research. Just because she has a PhD does not mean that she is qualified to create frequency lists. It all depends on what her PhD is in that would say whether or not she was qualified. I have a Masters in Fine Arts, this does not qualify me to do biological research. Charlotte Boehm came out with frequencies for H1N1 almost immediately after the outbreak. I talked to two very well known rifers, one has written several books on the subject and he said " I am skeptical of the DNA frequencies. Very skeptical. However, I try to keep an open mind. Let me know how you do with them so I can report on the topic to others who may ask. " The other person I talked to was a builder of some high quality Rife machines who said " If there were frequencies that actually disabled DNA, then it might mess with our own DNA too. " He went on to say that I should just stick with the frequencies that are proven. There are so many good frequencies out there for Lyme, I don't see the need to buy frequency information. I am almost past Lyme now using only 432. Charlotte is in the business of selling these frequencies, so in my book everything she says is suspect and must be taken with a grain of salt since her motive is profit driven. I would like to hear other people's experiences with her frequencies though as it helps to gather information from a lot of different sources. The DNA frequencies have been around for a lot of years and if they truly were helpful, it seems that more people in these rife groups would be discussing them. > > > > > > > > > > > > i also want to comment that i have purchased the lyme and co-infection frequencies and have found that the co-infection frequencies in particular have been effective. it is good, however, to do muscle testing to find the frxs that are having an effect. good website. thanks, janet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To: Lyme_and_Rife > > > > From: its_just_talk@ > > > > Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:13:07 -0800 > > > > Subject: DNA Frequencies - feedback > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To add to my last message, in all fairness to Char Boehm and her " DNA " frequencies, I will say that I do not have much feedback regarding their efficacy in treating Lyme and co's. There is a blogger who has other good information, who thinks highly of them. You can read his comments, here: > > > > http://www.alternativetherapyadvice.com/alternative_therapy/determine_frequencie\ s_therapy.htm > > > > > > > > Scroll down the center column on the above webpage, to see his remarks about the DNA frequencies. Anyone interested can research further. > > > > > > > > Coil users who do not herx from the known effective frequencies, might consider purchasing the DNA frequencies. But not herxing from the known effective frequencies, could be due to various factors that the DNA frequencies would not address, such as dormant disease (from use of antimicrobials), misdiagnosed disease, etc. > > > > > > > > Again, I know almost nothing about the DNA frequencies. I was exposed to high pressure promotion of them on the rife forum board, which did put me off. They could work well for conditions other than Lyme and co's - I don't know. But the premise behind them is truly beyond my scope. > > > > > > > > - Jane > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.