Guest guest Posted May 13, 2011 Report Share Posted May 13, 2011 in an article where we are discussing differences in the prevalence of renal replacement therapy ... that is, dialysis or transplantation, one of the issues involves medical practices/attitudes, specifically, the extent to which a nephrologist orders/suggests/proposes dialysis in relation to the extent of kidney disease, the patient's age and condition (patients older than 85, patients with so many comorbid conditions that they end up dying within a month or two of starting dialysis ... and thus whose quality of life may have been impaired substantially without any good reason). The client originally used the terms insistent and " incentived " ... which combined with the fact that she was examining doctors in private practice versus university hospital and other public doctors led me to think she was referring to the well-known -- in the US, at least -- practice of referrals for the doctors' financial benefit. That's not what she means, or at least she doesn't wish to refer to underlying motives, she says. she's suggested liberal versus conservatives toward RRT, to which i responded, aggressive versus conservative or individualized, or simply, more or less aggressive attitudes. in French that would be too strong she says, and she wants to know if it's too strong in English. I said I'd consult with colleagues. opinions? jo ann Jo Ann Cahn Traduction et relecture scientifiques joann.cahn@... joann.cahn@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.