Guest guest Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 Listmates: I want to try to clarify my view about diet and LDN. First, it has been shown in nurmerous studies from noted researchers such as Reichelt, Shattock, Panskeep, Jayonouchi, Horvath, Vojdani, etc etc that there are antibodies in our autistic kids' brains that show the reactivity (and now a recent excellent study by Vargas of the almost ubiquitous brain inflammation) as responses to the big peptides in the diet that our kids are unable to properly break down. We all know from the frequency of gut infections of inflammation in the GI tract that responds to dietary restriction of these foods. Earlier work showed that these peptides become caseo-gluteo -opioid like compounds in the brain that correlate with the high pain threshold and spaced out quality of children prior to being put onto restricted diets. I cannot begin to tell you the hundreds of posts I have received from parents all over the world relating how their child first made eye contact and stopped hand flapping within days or several weeks of starting the GF/CF/SF diet after reading my book. Except for coeliac (genetic allergy to wheat) patients, adults are not showing this very often, though more than we realized before the explosion of research in autism. Starting with the onslaught of so many vaccines with toxins in them, especially the mandated Hep B in 1991,(the enzyme that is naturally in the gut to properly break down these large peptides (DPPIV) which was disabled especially by mercury and further damaged by antibiotics), almost all of our autistic children given Hep B at birth or in that early newborn period have the sensitivity to casein and gluten and usually soy too, sometimes corn. So I would say that any child currently under 15 who got Hep B deserves a conscientious trial of the GF/CF/SF diet for at least 6 months, with testing IgG for other foods that could cause the continued inflammation of the gut. Repeated fungal and bacterial infections of the gut are tip-offs that the diet needs restriction along with proper nutrients that help the metabolic processes derive the nutrition from food necessary for good health. Our kids because of their oxidative stress and toxicity often require much higher doses of vitamins, minerals and fatty acids than NT children to function adequately; as they start to recover they need many less nutrients other than a good diet. There are many who think kids should even at the beginning of treatment go to the SCD because of the incompetence of these kids' guts to produce the enzymes that will properly break down these large peptides and the hastening of healing when on the proper diet. Though there is still a lot we do not know about LDN and its initial but short-lived opioid blocking aspect because of the minute dosages we are using, it is impossible to predict a clear correlation between diet that includes gluten and casein and reaction to LDN. Reports from the adult group (including Ann) are that adults seldom need to be on any special diet, as they have not received the early infantile vaccines that have so damaged our autistic children's ability to handle (to them) toxic foods. Autism is primarily a gut and immune system disease, so healing the gut and removing the toxins including foods and heavy metals that keep causing gut inflammation and suppression of their immune systems would seem to be the basis of our bio-medical treatment. The protocol of restrictive diet, anti-fungal/bacterial/viral treatment to heal the gut, methylation to help the almost ubiquitously damaged aspect of the folate cycle, detoxification, and helping the immune system improve to be able to protect the body properly against pathogenic invaders (bacteria, viruses, fungi) would definitely seem to be the mainstay of treatment of our kids. This protocol is recovering more and more children every day. If a child has a very strong negative reaction to LDN, that is a tip-off to me that they probably do have the opioid-like substances still in their system, and the diet deserves some close scrutiny. Along with the 15 ASD kids in my original study, I gave 6 NT kids the LDN, and none of them had any negative reaction to it, but several showed evidence of immune and allergy improvement quite quickly and those who have continued have stayed very well compared to their past history of infections. For them, I believe they were reaping the benefits of the immune modulation effect we know this low dose has, and were not affected by the opioid blockage effect, as they do not have the opioids in their brains. That, of course, is a very small sampling, and I know I cannot proclaim any scientific fact from such a tiny study. I believe that as our kids heal, their guts inevitably get better, and many can be gradually moved into a more regular diet, often with the help of enzymes through the transitition. Many parents continue giving the enzymes for " insurance " ; many of us have learned that enzymes are helpful to many people, not just autistic children, and I have been astonished at the commonness of bowel problems in the general population of which I had no awareness before my work with ASD. Some children even after recovery will avoid milk, knowing that their body does not like it, or just saying " I don't like milk! " I don't see this as often with wheat, however. Anyway, if I seem fanatic about diet, I have to say that unequivocally the most kids in my work over the years who have recovered have had extremely conscientious parents who adhered religiously to the diet until it was evident that their child was recovering and could start making the transition to a regular diet. In the early years, I had two groups of families, the ones who were dedicated and the ones who just hated the diet and were not willing or able to learn how to do it adequately. I began seeing a notable difference in those whose kids were recovering and those who were not, until in the last few years I won't even take on a child for an evaluation until the parents have stabilized the child on the gluten, casein, and soy restricted diet. Others may have different experiences, this is mine. The issue of bad reactions to LDN again are a tip-off that the child is still putting out opioids to the brain, and because we all have some endogenous opioids there is an adjustment period, but this is showing itself to be short lived for most kids, with a real break-through of positive behavioral and cognitive abilities very often following this adjustment period, especially so now that I am encouraging parents to move to the full strength as soon as possible. Note: A very tiny child may have 1-1/2 to 2mg being their full dose compared to the usual 3 mg for most kids. For the kids over 100#, I give them 4mg, over 120#, 4.5 like the adults. The strength of the immune modulation benefit of this medication takes longer than the cognitive/behavioral/language benefits, but not as long as I thought when I started the study, so the jury is still out on that one, and the study I am doing should shed a lot of light on what actually happens to the immune system over 4 months of taking the LDN. I'm hoping of course that it correlates with the clinical picture we will be seeing as we continue, and I will be sure to keep everyone posted. Dr. JM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.