Guest guest Posted January 29, 2004 Report Share Posted January 29, 2004 In a message dated 1/29/04 11:02:53 AM Eastern Standard Time, maurice@... writes: > > > >It looks like the big determining > >factor in build-up has to do with the amount of negative sites on the hair > >shaft. So, hair that's more damaged will have more build-up than hair that > is > >not....and it will be more difficult to remove. > > Or does it have to due with the cationic charge density of the polymer? > > Maurice Hi Maurice, Thank you--I'm glad you've joined this discussion Both apparently. For those who have Harry's Cosmeticology 8th edition--under Cleaning of Quaternary Ammonium Compounds and Cleaning of Polymeric Residue.....page 618--next to the last paragraph. By reducing the charge density of polyquaternium 10 they were able to remove 75% of it in one wash with SLS (wool swatches). So, Maurice, give us your thoughts on this issue We've shared this link before, but the section on cationic polymers is interesting: http://www.creative-developments.co.uk/papers/Formulators,%20it%20is%20time%20to\ %20widen%20your%20horizons.htm Angie The Herbarie Natural Source Ingredients for Toiletries & Cosmetics http://www.theherbarie.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.