Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: New Member-

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Gosh Tim, I'm glad you were able to make some headway with the

search function because I couldn't get anywhere with it. I tried

every way I could think of but still couldn't get it to work.

I was trying under subject matter at first, which didn't work,

so then when I finally found the message, I entered the number

in the search window and still got no results. The only problem

with playing around with the URL is you need to know the message

number, or somewhere in the vicinity. There should be some way

to search by author, subject, or whatever. I was pretty sure it

was Carole, but just took so long to finally get to it.

Carol

timothy romlein wrote:

original article:/group//?start=6598

> Thank you Carol! Your search of the messages made me want to say

> that there is a search function on the message page but it

> doesn't work. (I have sent egroups a note saying it would be

> nice if it worked, they replied it was broken but it's fixed. I

> still couldn't get any results!) I checked again, sure enough,

> no results. Then I looked at the URL and saw it had the start

> set to the last posting. So I changed it to start at 5000. Lo

> and behold, results popped out! The next search again gave no

> results, so I changed start from 4089 to 89. 28 post found which

> revealed the record of the earlier discussion.

>

> It started with Carole's mention of recurrance (4842),

> asked for more info (4890) as did Jodi (4896). said he

> thought the rate was 2% (4970). Carole gave brief story (4980)

> Peg asked for poll data (4982) expressed sympathy (4999)

> Jodi asked about process (5024) Biddy expressed concern and

> asked history (5036,5037) Carole gave the long version (5088)

> Luanne's welcome (5121) C. reports hearing of a study

> which indicates 20% recurrance rate, but can't find the

> reference.

>

> Now I've found a trick to make the search work. (I hate it. The

> search should work without having to twiddle the URL. Maybe when

> OneList & Egroups start merging the onelist search will prevail

> - though I'm not real happy about their search either - at least

> it works.) Has any one else experienced dysfunctional searches

> at egroups?

>

> Tim

>

> P.S. A quick way to go to a particular message # is to put it at

> the end of the pcs-support URL with a question mark, e.g. for

> 4980 use:

> /group//4980.html?

>

> --- cstaples@... wrote:

> > Hi ,

> >

> > When you asked the question about PSC reoccurring after

> > transplant, I was certain that I had read that someone in

> > our group had posted that she now has PSC again, post

> > transplant. After searching through the old messages on

> > the web, I finally found it. It is message #5088, Sep.29.

> > I am not certain if there is a quick way to get to that

> > particular message. I just kept clicking back until I

> > found it. Maybe someone else can enlighten us if there

> > is a more rapid search to get to a particular message or

> > date. Carol

>

> =====

>

> __________________________________________________

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to clarify what caused the search to return with

something other than " no matches for 'pouchitis' " (which I got

when I searched for " pouchitis " . In the URL I changed

" & start=6601 & " to " & start=601 & " (I think any change would work)

and hit <enter> (carriage return key). It came back almost

immediately with a page of 1-14 of 19 messages containing

" pouchitis " . (most recent first).

Another search for my id again didn't return anything until I

changed " start=1 " to " start=11 " . Then it had 290!

Tim

--- cstaples@... wrote:

>

> Gosh Tim, I'm glad you were able to make some headway with the

> search function because I couldn't get anywhere with it. I

> tried

> every way I could think of but still couldn't get it to work.

> I was trying under subject matter at first, which didn't work,

> so then when I finally found the message, I entered the number

> in the search window and still got no results. The only

> problem

> with playing around with the URL is you need to know the

> message

> number, or somewhere in the vicinity. ...

=====

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...