Guest guest Posted January 27, 2001 Report Share Posted January 27, 2001 I was wondering about that also. Does the PSC make you more prone to other cancers. Remember Laurie's cancer is all over her abdomen. The doctors have told us that having PSC makes Phil more prone to colon cancer. Peg I have a question. In Mike's case he was diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma. But in Mette's case, although she had PSC was the cause of death cancer, the operation (only in the sense that she was put under) or cholangiocarcinoma? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2001 Report Share Posted January 27, 2001 I have a question. In Mike's case he was diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma. But in Mette's case, although she had PSC was the cause of death cancer, the operation (only in the sense that she was put under) or cholangiocarcinoma? There were lost of similarities between she and Mike, for example blood clots... which I am told are common with cancer patients...severe back pain, although meds and treatment had been administered.....not being able to retain foods.....and finally cancer in the abdomen. We thought he was retaining fluid which has been seen as the normal progression. But we never thought to have that fluid tested until the very end. He also was up and moving to some degree, talking etc., but then slowly became non responsive and blood pressure drooped......... I guess what I am asking is although the cause of death is different, (possibly,) is the progression the same? SO how do you differentiate the difference between liver failure do to PSC, cholangiocarcinoma, and so called cancer of the abdomen? Especially without an autopsy Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2001 Report Share Posted January 27, 2001 >But in Mette's case, although she had PSC was the cause of death cancer, the >operation (only in the sense that she was put under) or cholangiocarcinoma there was a autopsy..I have not and will not read it.. my opinion is death was due to complications of the surgery in july to remove her gall bladder cancer.. that complication being a blood clot in the portal vein.. she had no blood flow in the portal vein since oct or nov.. that clot caused liver cell death in some areas which then liquified and abscessed.. at the same time the cancer reoccurred/continued and spread inside the abdomen.. had the cancer not been so present maybe the surgeons plan (section away the dead half of the liver, repair the hole in the intestines and install a feeding tube) could have given her the chance she needed to regenerate liver and maybe even an alternate venial blood supply--the doc said he had seen same before.. ah but, it was not to be. dd---as far as I know there was no cholangiocarcinoma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2001 Report Share Posted January 27, 2001 --- P Alfeld wrote: > I was wondering about that also. Does the PSC make you more > prone to other cancers. Remember Laurie's cancer is all over > her abdomen. The doctors have told us that having PSC makes > Phil more prone to colon cancer. > Peg As far as I know PSC doesn't increase your risk of cancers, other than cholangiocarcinoma, any more than other liver diseases (which increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma). The high incidence of UC among PSC patients gives us the higher risk of colon cancer. The colon cancer is associated with UC not PSC alone. (And recent studies hinted that colon cancer risk could be cut in half by taking URSO/Actigall.) I hope cholangiocarcinoma is reduced also, but studies to check that are hard to conduct because it is so hard to confirm or deny cholangiocarcinoma. Examination of livers removed during transplant may eventually produce some data on that. I don't know the origin of Laurie's cancer, but it evidently had begun its spread prior to her transplant. So even though the primary tumor was removed with the liver, what was left spread as a generalized cancer throughout her abdomen. > > I have a question. In Mike's case he was diagnosed with > cholangiocarcinoma. But in Mette's case, although she had PSC > was the cause of death cancer, the operation (only in the > sense that she was put under) or cholangiocarcinoma? > Lynn Cholangiocarcinoma is just a definite form of cancer located in the bile ducts, just as Hepatocellular carcinoma is cancer of the primary liver cells. Both Mike and Mette had cancers which metastasized (spread) to other locations. Viewed with the true vision of hindsight, Mette's symptoms fit a long term battle with cancer in her final months. Mette's cancer was originally diagnosed as of the gall bladder, not cholangiocarcinoma, though I suspect there is not much difference in behavior and difficulty of detection between the two. As I sat down to reply I thought - I don't know enough about this, Aubrey should answer. I still think so. I probably have missed much and gotten some thing wrong. TimR __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.