Guest guest Posted April 26, 2004 Report Share Posted April 26, 2004 >It contains potassium thiocyanate. The manufacturer claims this is not >a major component of the system therefore is not required to be >included in the INCI nomenclature (is this true?). Good question. This is what the regulations say: --------------------------------------------- 21 CFR 701.3(l) The provisions of this section do not require the declaration of incidental ingredients that are present in a cosmetic at insignificant levels and that have no technical or functional effect in the cosmetic. For the purpose of this paragraph, incidental ingredients are: (1) Substances that have no technical or functional effect in the cosmetic but are present by reason of having been incorporated into the cosmetic as an ingredient of another cosmetic ingredient. (2) Processing aids, which are as follows: (i) Substances that are added to a cosmetic during the processing of such cosmetic but are removed from the cosmetic in accordance with good manufacturing practices before it is packaged in its finished form. (ii) Substances that are added to a cosmetic during processing for their technical or functional effect in the processing, are converted to substances the same as constituents of declared ingredients, and do not significantly increase the concentration of those constituents. (iii) Substances that are added to a cosmetic during the processing of such cosmetic for their technical and functional effect in the processing but are present in the finished cosmetic at insignificant levels and do not have any technical or functional effect in that cosmetic. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?FR=701.3 --------------------------------------------- and this is what the Biovert FAQ says: http://www.archpersonalcare.com/ProductDocumentation/Technical%20Data%20Sheet/Bi\ overt%20FAQ%20v%201.1.pdf --------------------------------------------- The Biovert enzyme solution contains glucose oxidase and lactoperoxidase The Biovert substrate solution contains glucose along with two ESSENTIAL ingredients, potassium thiocyanate and potassium iodide, at very low concentrations. As these formulating aids are used at concentrations of less than 1% and do not contribute efficacy to the substrate solution alone they do not need to appear in the INCI nomenclature. Upon addition of the Biovert enzyme solution into the final formulation, these aids are ACTIVATED. --------------------------------------------- I added the capitalization for emphasis. Personally, I don't see how two ESSENTIAL ingredients that are ACTIVATED in the final formula can be considered to be incidental ingredients. Looks like abuse of the FDA's regulations. >A quick google of >potassium thiocyanate produces an MSDS that reads like a horror story >and it's general use as a pesticide and fungicide (is this true?). Is it a >concern to have this chemical in skincare? Does it accumulate in the >body's tissues or organs? I am not familiar with the uses of potassium thiocyanate. >It's effectiveness drops when temperatures reach over 35C. I am >thinking of hot Australian summers and postal conditions.... for >effectivity to drop does it need to only be exposed to that temperature >once or does it need to be maintained constantly at that temperature to >comprise the system? A Biovert brochure says that: " Biovert should not be exposed to process temperatures in excess of 40ø C. In elevated storage trials, typical emulsion based products containing Biovert are able to withstand BP challenge testing after more than two months storage below 40ø C, three months at 37ø C, six months at 35ø C and over two years at 25ø C. This robust enzyme based system is being utilized by manufacturers of consumer products the world over. Sales have been made to extremely hot equatorial countries such as Ecuador right through to freezing cold climates like Iceland. " >They claim that high levels of cationic surfactants can compromise the >system, forgive my ignorance of chemical basics, but are cationic >emulsifiers like BTMS grouped in this category? Yes. >The above are all questions that are not addressed by the company's >FAQ on the Biovert system, so any clarification on the above points >would be gratefully received. , you should compare the cost of using a Biovert preservative system to other preservative systems. Biovert (aka Myavert C) has been around for about 10 years. You should ask yourself why don't more cosmetic companies use Biovert. I know of one large " natural " company that tried Myavert C and had to do a product recall because of contamination. They don't use Myavert C or Biovert any more. Maurice -------------------------------------------------------- Maurice O. Hevey Convergent Cosmetics, Inc. http://www.ConvergentCosmetics.com ------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2004 Report Share Posted April 26, 2004 I have a question that is somewhat unrelated. The highlighted paragraph would indicate to me that in the case of soap (labelled in the US as a cosmetic) would not require sodium hydroxide to be listed in the ingredient list. Would you agree Maurice? cathy Sutton. Good question. This is what the regulations say: --------------------------------------------- 21 CFR 701.3(l) The provisions of this section do not require the declaration of incidental ingredients that are present in a cosmetic at insignificant levels and that have no technical or functional effect in the cosmetic. For the purpose of this paragraph, incidental ingredients are: (1) Substances that have no technical or functional effect in the cosmetic but are present by reason of having been incorporated into the cosmetic as an ingredient of another cosmetic ingredient. (2) Processing aids, which are as follows: (i) Substances that are added to a cosmetic during the processing of such cosmetic but are removed from the cosmetic in accordance with good manufacturing practices before it is packaged in its finished form. (ii) Substances that are added to a cosmetic during processing for their technical or functional effect in the processing, are converted to substances the same as constituents of declared ingredients, and do not significantly increase the concentration of those constituents. (iii) Substances that are added to a cosmetic during the processing of such cosmetic for their technical and functional effect in the processing but are present in the finished cosmetic at insignificant levels and do not have any technical or functional effect in that cosmetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.