Guest guest Posted December 31, 2010 Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230. From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of PierceSent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AMTo: Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV Have any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data? I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time.Happy New Year, Pierce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2010 Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 A couple of us at IMP tried to talk to Leinhart a couple of yrs ago , indeed I have some emails from her saved somewhere.Lynn Ho had tried to use HYH as an alternative part iV module and wrote up a great write up for them ABFM declined and rather put us off- they kept saying- and due to my advanced age I will not get the words exactly right they said they were developing a new module and HYH might fit into it-- but every time we asked it was always being put off That is themodules they have now are disease specifc and they were develping a more general or overacrhing module I will not eplain it well was very nice but could not get the thing ot happen for us Nevertheless it was " to be developed " and eveytime we asked was being pushed out to some future date This is absolultey the kind of thing that makes sense but I think noone has had the time or energy to go back to ABFM andwork with them Volunteers anyone? If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230. From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Pierce Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AMTo: Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV Have any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data? I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time.Happy New Year, Pierce -- PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questionsEmail replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2010 Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 Here is what she sent me 7-08 Good afternoon, Dr. Antonucci, Thank you for your interest in the American Board of Family Medicine’s (ABFM) Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) program. I misunderstood your email address in your first voicemail message, so unfortunately my original email did not make it to you. Hopefully you will receive this message. For a module to be considered for approval as an alternate activity that will count toward ABFM Diplomates’ MC-FP requirements, it must satisfy specific standards and technical requirements. The file Requirements of External Providers is the current ABFM guideline for Part IV activities. The document includes Requirements of External Providers, Additional Requirements of External Providers (Part IV), and appendixes C, E, F, and G. The file MC-FP Data Service Description outlines the data exchange requirements for external providers. It is important to note that we are in the process of updating our Part IV requirements documentation to reflect changes made at our April Board meeting, where it was decided that the ABFM would proscribe commercial support for external activities and that the ABFM would require the use of nationally accepted indicators (e.g., PCPI, AQA, and NFQ) in QI activities. Also attached is the current external provider application that must be completed and submitted with each Part IV activity that is to be considered for approval. For more information about the ABFM’s Part IV activities (PPMs and the new MIMM), please see our Website at https://www.theabfm.org/moc/part4.aspx. The release date for the CPPM (Comprehensive PPM) that you mentioned in your message has been delayed until later this year. In a PPM, the physician is required to complete 10 chart reviews and have 10 patients complete a survey, and then manually enter data gathered. But in the CPPM, the physician will be able to input aggregate data and avoid having to complete the chart reviews and having the patients complete surveys. The MIMM activity is a Part IV activity that was designed for physicians to do not provide continuous care to patients (i.e., emergency room physicians, administrators, etc.). After reviewing the attached documents, if you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me by email at nlainhart@... or by phone at , extension 1230; or contact Dr. Hagen by email at hagen@... or by phone at , extension 1291. If you would like to contact me, I am usually in the office from 7:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. (EST). A couple of us at IMP tried to talk to Leinhart a couple of yrs ago , indeed I have some emails from her saved somewhere. Lynn Ho had tried to use HYH as an alternative part iV module and wrote up a great write up for them ABFM declined and rather put us off- they kept saying- and due to my advanced age I will not get the words exactly right they said they were developing a new module and HYH might fit into it-- but every time we asked it was always being put off That is themodules they have now are disease specifc and they were develping a more general or overacrhing module I will not eplain it well was very nice but could not get the thing ot happen for us Nevertheless it was " to be developed " and eveytime we asked was being pushed out to some future date This is absolultey the kind of thing that makes sense but I think noone has had the time or energy to go back to ABFM andwork with them Volunteers anyone? If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230. From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Pierce Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AMTo: Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV Have any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data? I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time.Happy New Year, Pierce -- PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questionsEmail replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org -- PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questionsEmail replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2010 Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 HYH is not one of the officially recognized pathways, but that's not the end of the story. The work of part IV is well met by the work of our self assessment recognition program and we plan to go back formally to the ABFM.I'm sure there are others on the list who would be interested, and if there are a number of you who want to do this work in conjunction with our self assessment recognition program (currently in beta), please let me know.Gordon If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230. From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of PierceSent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AMTo: Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV Have any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data? I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time.Happy New Year, Pierce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2010 Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 HYH is not one of the officially recognized pathways, but that's not the end of the story. The work of part IV is well met by the work of our self assessment recognition program and we plan to go back formally to the ABFM. I'm sure there are others on the list who would be interested, and if there are a number of you who want to do this work in conjunction with our self assessment recognition program (currently in beta), please let me know. Gordon I'd be interested in this. I have to do a part IV module in 2011 anyway. One of my partners here needs to do a Part IV now as well, I'll ask her. Done well, this might result in more family docs participating in IMP or HYH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2010 Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 I am interested in using HYH in my practice and at the same time use it to fulfill the Part IV requirement. What can I do to help?Sent from my iPhone HYH is not one of the officially recognized pathways, but that's not the end of the story. The work of part IV is well met by the work of our self assessment recognition program and we plan to go back formally to the ABFM. I'm sure there are others on the list who would be interested, and if there are a number of you who want to do this work in conjunction with our self assessment recognition program (currently in beta), please let me know. Gordon I'd be interested in this. I have to do a part IV module in 2011 anyway. One of my partners here needs to do a Part IV now as well, I'll ask her. Done well, this might result in more family docs participating in IMP or HYH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2010 Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 I am interested in using HYH in my practice and at the same time use it to fulfill the Part IV requirement. What can I do to help?Sent from my iPhone HYH is not one of the officially recognized pathways, but that's not the end of the story. The work of part IV is well met by the work of our self assessment recognition program and we plan to go back formally to the ABFM. I'm sure there are others on the list who would be interested, and if there are a number of you who want to do this work in conjunction with our self assessment recognition program (currently in beta), please let me know. Gordon I'd be interested in this. I have to do a part IV module in 2011 anyway. One of my partners here needs to do a Part IV now as well, I'll ask her. Done well, this might result in more family docs participating in IMP or HYH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2010 Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 This work is going to take several steps.1: We continue to add to the number of practices using HYH as a tool for patient engagement.2: Those using the tool benchmark their results against national norms and the targets we've set as part of our self assessment recognition program.3: Through our IMP conference calls and collaborative work, individuals pursue the goals of Part IV practice based improvement.While this is happening the IMP organization will work with the ABFM and go through their processes of gaining recognition for our approach.I cannot guarantee that we'll clear organizational hurdles, but am confident that the work meets (and even exceeds) the ABFM's goals for demonstration of practice based improvement. Even if we fail to receive recognition from them now, IMPs who have used this process should be able to very easily demonstrate the necessary requirements through a parallel process.I'll add your name to the list we're building of those in the beta program.Gordon I am interested in using HYH in my practice and at the same time use it to fulfill the Part IV requirement. What can I do to help?Sent from my iPhone HYH is not one of the officially recognized pathways, but that's not the end of the story. The work of part IV is well met by the work of our self assessment recognition program and we plan to go back formally to the ABFM. I'm sure there are others on the list who would be interested, and if there are a number of you who want to do this work in conjunction with our self assessment recognition program (currently in beta), please let me know. Gordon I'd be interested in this. I have to do a part IV module in 2011 anyway. One of my partners here needs to do a Part IV now as well, I'll ask her. Done well, this might result in more family docs participating in IMP or HYH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2010 Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 This work is going to take several steps.1: We continue to add to the number of practices using HYH as a tool for patient engagement.2: Those using the tool benchmark their results against national norms and the targets we've set as part of our self assessment recognition program.3: Through our IMP conference calls and collaborative work, individuals pursue the goals of Part IV practice based improvement.While this is happening the IMP organization will work with the ABFM and go through their processes of gaining recognition for our approach.I cannot guarantee that we'll clear organizational hurdles, but am confident that the work meets (and even exceeds) the ABFM's goals for demonstration of practice based improvement. Even if we fail to receive recognition from them now, IMPs who have used this process should be able to very easily demonstrate the necessary requirements through a parallel process.I'll add your name to the list we're building of those in the beta program.Gordon I am interested in using HYH in my practice and at the same time use it to fulfill the Part IV requirement. What can I do to help?Sent from my iPhone HYH is not one of the officially recognized pathways, but that's not the end of the story. The work of part IV is well met by the work of our self assessment recognition program and we plan to go back formally to the ABFM. I'm sure there are others on the list who would be interested, and if there are a number of you who want to do this work in conjunction with our self assessment recognition program (currently in beta), please let me know. Gordon I'd be interested in this. I have to do a part IV module in 2011 anyway. One of my partners here needs to do a Part IV now as well, I'll ask her. Done well, this might result in more family docs participating in IMP or HYH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2010 Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 I just finished my Part IV requirements, and it is such a joke compared to what IMPs using HYH and have improvement do. Can I be in the beta group? Eads, MD Pinnacle Family Medicine Colorado Springs, CO www.PinnacleFamilyMedicine.com From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of L. Gordon Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:12 AM To: Subject: Re: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV This work is going to take several steps. 1: We continue to add to the number of practices using HYH as a tool for patient engagement. 2: Those using the tool benchmark their results against national norms and the targets we've set as part of our self assessment recognition program. 3: Through our IMP conference calls and collaborative work, individuals pursue the goals of Part IV practice based improvement. While this is happening the IMP organization will work with the ABFM and go through their processes of gaining recognition for our approach. I cannot guarantee that we'll clear organizational hurdles, but am confident that the work meets (and even exceeds) the ABFM's goals for demonstration of practice based improvement. Even if we fail to receive recognition from them now, IMPs who have used this process should be able to very easily demonstrate the necessary requirements through a parallel process. I'll add your name to the list we're building of those in the beta program. Gordon I am interested in using HYH in my practice and at the same time use it to fulfill the Part IV requirement. What can I do to help? Sent from my iPhone On Dec 31, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Pierce wrote: HYH is not one of the officially recognized pathways, but that's not the end of the story. The work of part IV is well met by the work of our self assessment recognition program and we plan to go back formally to the ABFM. I'm sure there are others on the list who would be interested, and if there are a number of you who want to do this work in conjunction with our self assessment recognition program (currently in beta), please let me know. Gordon I'd be interested in this. I have to do a part IV module in 2011 anyway. One of my partners here needs to do a Part IV now as well, I'll ask her. Done well, this might result in more family docs participating in IMP or HYH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2011 Report Share Posted January 1, 2011 I have some interest in the board, and may have some input next year. What would you all like to see the ABFM do? ________________________________________ From: [ ] On Behalf Of [jnantonucci@...] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 9:40 AM To: Subject: Re: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV A couple of us at IMP tried to talk to Leinhart a couple of yrs ago , indeed I have some emails from her saved somewhere. Lynn Ho had tried to use HYH as an alternative part iV module and wrote up a great write up for them ABFM declined and rather put us off- they kept saying- and due to my advanced age I will not get the words exactly right they said they were developing a new module and HYH might fit into it-- but every time we asked it was always being put off That is themodules they have now are disease specifc and they were develping a more general or overacrhing module I will not eplain it well was very nice but could not get the thing ot happen for us Nevertheless it was " to be developed " and eveytime we asked was being pushed out to some future date This is absolultey the kind of thing that makes sense but I think noone has had the time or energy to go back to ABFM andwork with them Volunteers anyone? On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM, theNeighbors > wrote: If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230. From: <mailto: \ > [mailto: <mailto:@yahoogr\ oups.com>] On Behalf Of Pierce Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AM To: <mailto: \ > Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV Have any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements <https://www.theabfm.org/moc/index.aspx> for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data? I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time. Happy New Year, Pierce -- PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questions Email replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2011 Report Share Posted January 1, 2011 I have some interest in the board, and may have some input next year. What would you all like to see the ABFM do? ________________________________________ From: [ ] On Behalf Of [jnantonucci@...] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 9:40 AM To: Subject: Re: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV A couple of us at IMP tried to talk to Leinhart a couple of yrs ago , indeed I have some emails from her saved somewhere. Lynn Ho had tried to use HYH as an alternative part iV module and wrote up a great write up for them ABFM declined and rather put us off- they kept saying- and due to my advanced age I will not get the words exactly right they said they were developing a new module and HYH might fit into it-- but every time we asked it was always being put off That is themodules they have now are disease specifc and they were develping a more general or overacrhing module I will not eplain it well was very nice but could not get the thing ot happen for us Nevertheless it was " to be developed " and eveytime we asked was being pushed out to some future date This is absolultey the kind of thing that makes sense but I think noone has had the time or energy to go back to ABFM andwork with them Volunteers anyone? On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM, theNeighbors > wrote: If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230. From: <mailto: \ > [mailto: <mailto:@yahoogr\ oups.com>] On Behalf Of Pierce Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AM To: <mailto: \ > Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV Have any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements <https://www.theabfm.org/moc/index.aspx> for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data? I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time. Happy New Year, Pierce -- PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questions Email replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2011 Report Share Posted January 1, 2011 I am one of four finalists to be on the ABFM staring in April. I have reason to believe that they are looking for new and interesting ways to be more interactive and dynamic in their recertification. If this occurs, I will be a newbee, but love to this as a way to do the certification. So we will see what comes of the process. ________________________________________ From: [ ] On Behalf Of [jnantonucci@...] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 9:44 AM To: Subject: Re: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV Here is what she sent me 7-08 Good afternoon, Dr. Antonucci, Thank you for your interest in the American Board of Family Medicine’s (ABFM) Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) program. I misunderstood your email address in your first voicemail message, so unfortunately my original email did not make it to you. Hopefully you will receive this message. For a module to be considered for approval as an alternate activity that will count toward ABFM Diplomates’ MC-FP requirements, it must satisfy specific standards and technical requirements. The file Requirements of External Providers is the current ABFM guideline for Part IV activities. The document includes Requirements of External Providers, Additional Requirements of External Providers (Part IV), and appendixes C, E, F, and G. The file MC-FP Data Service Description outlines the data exchange requirements for external providers. It is important to note that we are in the process of updating our Part IV requirements documentation to reflect changes made at our April Board meeting, where it was decided that the ABFM would proscribe commercial support for external activities and that the ABFM would require the use of nationally accepted indicators (e.g., PCPI, AQA, and NFQ) in QI activities. Also attached is the current external provider application that must be completed and submitted with each Part IV activity that is to be considered for approval. For more information about the ABFM’s Part IV activities (PPMs and the new MIMM), please see our Website at https://www.theabfm.org/moc/part4.aspx. The release date for the CPPM (Comprehensive PPM) that you mentioned in your message has been delayed until later this year. In a PPM, the physician is required to complete 10 chart reviews and have 10 patients complete a survey, and then manually enter data gathered. But in the CPPM, the physician will be able to input aggregate data and avoid having to complete the chart reviews and having the patients complete surveys. The MIMM activity is a Part IV activity that was designed for physicians to do not provide continuous care to patients (i.e., emergency room physicians, administrators, etc.). After reviewing the attached documents, if you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me by email at nlainhart@... or by phone at , extension 1230; or contact Dr. Hagen by email at hagen@... or by phone at , extension 1291. If you would like to contact me, I am usually in the office from 7:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. (EST). On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:40 AM, > wrote: A couple of us at IMP tried to talk to Leinhart a couple of yrs ago , indeed I have some emails from her saved somewhere. Lynn Ho had tried to use HYH as an alternative part iV module and wrote up a great write up for them ABFM declined and rather put us off- they kept saying- and due to my advanced age I will not get the words exactly right they said they were developing a new module and HYH might fit into it-- but every time we asked it was always being put off That is themodules they have now are disease specifc and they were develping a more general or overacrhing module I will not eplain it well was very nice but could not get the thing ot happen for us Nevertheless it was " to be developed " and eveytime we asked was being pushed out to some future date This is absolultey the kind of thing that makes sense but I think noone has had the time or energy to go back to ABFM andwork with them Volunteers anyone? On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM, theNeighbors > wrote: If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230. From: <mailto: \ > [mailto: <mailto:@yahoogr\ oups.com>] On Behalf Of Pierce Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AM To: <mailto: \ > Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV Have any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements <https://www.theabfm.org/moc/index.aspx> for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data? I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time. Happy New Year, Pierce -- PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questions Email replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org> -- PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questions Email replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2011 Report Share Posted January 1, 2011 I am one of four finalists to be on the ABFM staring in April. I have reason to believe that they are looking for new and interesting ways to be more interactive and dynamic in their recertification. If this occurs, I will be a newbee, but love to this as a way to do the certification. So we will see what comes of the process. ________________________________________ From: [ ] On Behalf Of [jnantonucci@...] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 9:44 AM To: Subject: Re: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV Here is what she sent me 7-08 Good afternoon, Dr. Antonucci, Thank you for your interest in the American Board of Family Medicine’s (ABFM) Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) program. I misunderstood your email address in your first voicemail message, so unfortunately my original email did not make it to you. Hopefully you will receive this message. For a module to be considered for approval as an alternate activity that will count toward ABFM Diplomates’ MC-FP requirements, it must satisfy specific standards and technical requirements. The file Requirements of External Providers is the current ABFM guideline for Part IV activities. The document includes Requirements of External Providers, Additional Requirements of External Providers (Part IV), and appendixes C, E, F, and G. The file MC-FP Data Service Description outlines the data exchange requirements for external providers. It is important to note that we are in the process of updating our Part IV requirements documentation to reflect changes made at our April Board meeting, where it was decided that the ABFM would proscribe commercial support for external activities and that the ABFM would require the use of nationally accepted indicators (e.g., PCPI, AQA, and NFQ) in QI activities. Also attached is the current external provider application that must be completed and submitted with each Part IV activity that is to be considered for approval. For more information about the ABFM’s Part IV activities (PPMs and the new MIMM), please see our Website at https://www.theabfm.org/moc/part4.aspx. The release date for the CPPM (Comprehensive PPM) that you mentioned in your message has been delayed until later this year. In a PPM, the physician is required to complete 10 chart reviews and have 10 patients complete a survey, and then manually enter data gathered. But in the CPPM, the physician will be able to input aggregate data and avoid having to complete the chart reviews and having the patients complete surveys. The MIMM activity is a Part IV activity that was designed for physicians to do not provide continuous care to patients (i.e., emergency room physicians, administrators, etc.). After reviewing the attached documents, if you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me by email at nlainhart@... or by phone at , extension 1230; or contact Dr. Hagen by email at hagen@... or by phone at , extension 1291. If you would like to contact me, I am usually in the office from 7:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. (EST). On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:40 AM, > wrote: A couple of us at IMP tried to talk to Leinhart a couple of yrs ago , indeed I have some emails from her saved somewhere. Lynn Ho had tried to use HYH as an alternative part iV module and wrote up a great write up for them ABFM declined and rather put us off- they kept saying- and due to my advanced age I will not get the words exactly right they said they were developing a new module and HYH might fit into it-- but every time we asked it was always being put off That is themodules they have now are disease specifc and they were develping a more general or overacrhing module I will not eplain it well was very nice but could not get the thing ot happen for us Nevertheless it was " to be developed " and eveytime we asked was being pushed out to some future date This is absolultey the kind of thing that makes sense but I think noone has had the time or energy to go back to ABFM andwork with them Volunteers anyone? On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM, theNeighbors > wrote: If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230. From: <mailto: \ > [mailto: <mailto:@yahoogr\ oups.com>] On Behalf Of Pierce Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AM To: <mailto: \ > Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV Have any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements <https://www.theabfm.org/moc/index.aspx> for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data? I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time. Happy New Year, Pierce -- PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questions Email replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org> -- PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questions Email replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2011 Report Share Posted January 1, 2011 I would just like to put my name out there also if a group list is being collated around these issues. I'm happy to help where and when needed. I just finished my part IV and from an IMP perspective was discouraged by what I need to do to keep my license active.And my group has plans to use HYH this upcoming year. Weakland This work is going to take several steps.1: We continue to add to the number of practices using HYH as a tool for patient engagement.2: Those using the tool benchmark their results against national norms and the targets we've set as part of our self assessment recognition program.3: Through our IMP conference calls and collaborative work, individuals pursue the goals of Part IV practice based improvement.While this is happening the IMP organization will work with the ABFM and go through their processes of gaining recognition for our approach.I cannot guarantee that we'll clear organizational hurdles, but am confident that the work meets (and even exceeds) the ABFM's goals for demonstration of practice based improvement. Even if we fail to receive recognition from them now, IMPs who have used this process should be able to very easily demonstrate the necessary requirements through a parallel process.I'll add your name to the list we're building of those in the beta program.Gordon I am interested in using HYH in my practice and at the same time use it to fulfill the Part IV requirement. What can I do to help?Sent from my iPhone HYH is not one of the officially recognized pathways, but that's not the end of the story. The work of part IV is well met by the work of our self assessment recognition program and we plan to go back formally to the ABFM. I'm sure there are others on the list who would be interested, and if there are a number of you who want to do this work in conjunction with our self assessment recognition program (currently in beta), please let me know. Gordon I'd be interested in this. I have to do a part IV module in 2011 anyway. One of my partners here needs to do a Part IV now as well, I'll ask her. Done well, this might result in more family docs participating in IMP or HYH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2011 Report Share Posted January 1, 2011 I would just like to put my name out there also if a group list is being collated around these issues. I'm happy to help where and when needed. I just finished my part IV and from an IMP perspective was discouraged by what I need to do to keep my license active.And my group has plans to use HYH this upcoming year. Weakland This work is going to take several steps.1: We continue to add to the number of practices using HYH as a tool for patient engagement.2: Those using the tool benchmark their results against national norms and the targets we've set as part of our self assessment recognition program.3: Through our IMP conference calls and collaborative work, individuals pursue the goals of Part IV practice based improvement.While this is happening the IMP organization will work with the ABFM and go through their processes of gaining recognition for our approach.I cannot guarantee that we'll clear organizational hurdles, but am confident that the work meets (and even exceeds) the ABFM's goals for demonstration of practice based improvement. Even if we fail to receive recognition from them now, IMPs who have used this process should be able to very easily demonstrate the necessary requirements through a parallel process.I'll add your name to the list we're building of those in the beta program.Gordon I am interested in using HYH in my practice and at the same time use it to fulfill the Part IV requirement. What can I do to help?Sent from my iPhone HYH is not one of the officially recognized pathways, but that's not the end of the story. The work of part IV is well met by the work of our self assessment recognition program and we plan to go back formally to the ABFM. I'm sure there are others on the list who would be interested, and if there are a number of you who want to do this work in conjunction with our self assessment recognition program (currently in beta), please let me know. Gordon I'd be interested in this. I have to do a part IV module in 2011 anyway. One of my partners here needs to do a Part IV now as well, I'll ask her. Done well, this might result in more family docs participating in IMP or HYH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2011 Report Share Posted January 1, 2011 Here's rooting for you Jim! I too was disspappointed in Part IV requirements. To: " " < >Sent: Sat, January 1, 2011 10:30:33 AMSubject: RE: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IVI am one of four finalists to be on the ABFM staring in April. I have reason to believe that they are looking for new and interesting ways to be more interactive and dynamic in their recertification. If this occurs, I will be a newbee, but love to this as a way to do the certification. So we will see what comes of the process. ________________________________________From: [ ] On Behalf Of [jnantonucci@...]Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 9:44 AMTo: Subject: Re: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IVHere is what she sent me 7-08Good afternoon, Dr. Antonucci,Thank you for your interest in the American Board of Family Medicine’s (ABFM) Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) program. I misunderstood your email address in your first voicemail message, so unfortunately my original email did not make it to you. Hopefully you will receive this message.For a module to be considered for approval as an alternate activity that will count toward ABFM Diplomates’ MC-FP requirements, it must satisfy specific standards and technical requirements. The file Requirements of External Providers is the current ABFM guideline for Part IV activities. The document includes Requirements of External Providers, Additional Requirements of External Providers (Part IV), and appendixes C, E, F, and G. The file MC-FP Data Service Description outlines the data exchange requirements for external providers.It is important to note that we are in the process of updating our Part IV requirements documentation to reflect changes made at our April Board meeting, where it was decided that the ABFM would proscribe commercial support for external activities and that the ABFM would require the use of nationally accepted indicators (e.g., PCPI, AQA, and NFQ) in QI activities.Also attached is the current external provider application that must be completed and submitted with each Part IV activity that is to be considered for approval.For more information about the ABFM’s Part IV activities (PPMs and the new MIMM), please see our Website at https://www.theabfm.org/moc/part4.aspx. The release date for the CPPM (Comprehensive PPM) that you mentioned in your message has been delayed until later this year. In a PPM, the physician is required to complete 10 chart reviews and have 10 patients complete a survey, and then manually enter data gathered. But in the CPPM, the physician will be able to input aggregate data and avoid having to complete the chart reviews and having the patients complete surveys. The MIMM activity is a Part IV activity that was designed for physicians to do not provide continuous care to patients (i.e., emergency room physicians, administrators, etc.).After reviewing the attached documents, if you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me by email at nlainhart@... or by phone at , extension 1230; or contact Dr. Hagen by email at hagen@... or by phone at , extension 1291.If you would like to contact me, I am usually in the office from 7:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. (EST).On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:40 AM, > wrote:A couple of us at IMP tried to talk to Leinhart a couple of yrs ago , indeed I have some emails from her saved somewhere.Lynn Ho had tried to use HYH as an alternative part iV module and wrote up a great write up for themABFM declined and rather put us off- they kept saying- and due to my advanced age I will not get the words exactly right they said they were developing a new module and HYH might fit into it-- but every time we asked it was always being put off That is themodules they have now are disease specifc and they were develping a more general or overacrhing module I will not eplain it well was very nice but could not get the thing ot happen for us Nevertheless it was "to be developed" and eveytime we asked was being pushed out to some future dateThis is absolultey the kind of thing that makes sense but I think noone has had the time or energy to go back to ABFM andwork with themVolunteers anyone?On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM, theNeighbors > wrote:If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230.From: <mailto: > [mailto: <mailto: >] On Behalf Of PierceSent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AMTo: <mailto: >Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IVHave any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements <https://www.theabfm.org/moc/index.aspx> for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data?I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time.Happy New Year, Pierce--PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!)Email is best used for appointment making and brief questionsEmail replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org>--PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!)Email is best used for appointment making and brief questionsEmail replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent .. MD ph fax impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org>------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2011 Report Share Posted January 1, 2011 Very cool Jim. I'll email you off list. Gordon > I am one of four finalists to be on the ABFM staring in April. I have reason to believe that they are looking for new and interesting ways to be more interactive and dynamic in their recertification. If this occurs, I will be a newbee, but love to this as a way to do the certification. So we will see what comes of the process. > ________________________________________ > From: [ ] On Behalf Of [jnantonucci@...] > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 9:44 AM > To: > Subject: Re: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV > > Here is what she sent me 7-08 > > Good afternoon, Dr. Antonucci, > > Thank you for your interest in the American Board of Family Medicine’s (ABFM) Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) program. I misunderstood your email address in your first voicemail message, so unfortunately my original email did not make it to you. Hopefully you will receive this message. > > For a module to be considered for approval as an alternate activity that will count toward ABFM Diplomates’ MC-FP requirements, it must satisfy specific standards and technical requirements. The file Requirements of External Providers is the current ABFM guideline for Part IV activities. The document includes Requirements of External Providers, Additional Requirements of External Providers (Part IV), and appendixes C, E, F, and G. The file MC-FP Data Service Description outlines the data exchange requirements for external providers. > > It is important to note that we are in the process of updating our Part IV requirements documentation to reflect changes made at our April Board meeting, where it was decided that the ABFM would proscribe commercial support for external activities and that the ABFM would require the use of nationally accepted indicators (e.g., PCPI, AQA, and NFQ) in QI activities. > > Also attached is the current external provider application that must be completed and submitted with each Part IV activity that is to be considered for approval. > > For more information about the ABFM’s Part IV activities (PPMs and the new MIMM), please see our Website at https://www.theabfm.org/moc/part4.aspx. The release date for the CPPM (Comprehensive PPM) that you mentioned in your message has been delayed until later this year. In a PPM, the physician is required to complete 10 chart reviews and have 10 patients complete a survey, and then manually enter data gathered. But in the CPPM, the physician will be able to input aggregate data and avoid having to complete the chart reviews and having the patients complete surveys. The MIMM activity is a Part IV activity that was designed for physicians to do not provide continuous care to patients (i.e., emergency room physicians, administrators, etc.). > > After reviewing the attached documents, if you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me by email at nlainhart@... or by phone at , extension 1230; or contact Dr. Hagen by email at hagen@... or by phone at , extension 1291. > > If you would like to contact me, I am usually in the office from 7:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. (EST). > > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:40 AM, > wrote: > A couple of us at IMP tried to talk to Leinhart a couple of yrs ago , indeed I have some emails from her saved somewhere. > Lynn Ho had tried to use HYH as an alternative part iV module and wrote up a great write up for them > ABFM declined and rather put us off- they kept saying- and due to my advanced age I will not get the words exactly right they said they were developing a new module and HYH might fit into it-- but every time we asked it was always being put off That is themodules they have now are disease specifc and they were develping a more general or overacrhing module I will not eplain it well was very nice but could not get the thing ot happen for us Nevertheless it was " to be developed " and eveytime we asked was being pushed out to some future date > > > This is absolultey the kind of thing that makes sense but I think noone has had the time or energy to go back to ABFM andwork with them > Volunteers anyone? > > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM, theNeighbors > wrote: > > If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230. > > > > From: <mailto: \ > [mailto: <mailto:@yahoogr\ oups.com>] On Behalf Of Pierce > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AM > To: <mailto: \ > > Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV > > > > Have any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements <https://www.theabfm.org/moc/index.aspx> for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data? > > I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time. > > Happy New Year, > Pierce > > > > > > -- > PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) > Email is best used for appointment making and brief questions > Email replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . > > > MD > > > ph fax > impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org> > > > > -- > PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) > Email is best used for appointment making and brief questions > Email replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . > > > MD > > > ph fax > impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org> > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2011 Report Share Posted January 1, 2011 Very cool Jim. I'll email you off list. Gordon > I am one of four finalists to be on the ABFM staring in April. I have reason to believe that they are looking for new and interesting ways to be more interactive and dynamic in their recertification. If this occurs, I will be a newbee, but love to this as a way to do the certification. So we will see what comes of the process. > ________________________________________ > From: [ ] On Behalf Of [jnantonucci@...] > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 9:44 AM > To: > Subject: Re: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV > > Here is what she sent me 7-08 > > Good afternoon, Dr. Antonucci, > > Thank you for your interest in the American Board of Family Medicine’s (ABFM) Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) program. I misunderstood your email address in your first voicemail message, so unfortunately my original email did not make it to you. Hopefully you will receive this message. > > For a module to be considered for approval as an alternate activity that will count toward ABFM Diplomates’ MC-FP requirements, it must satisfy specific standards and technical requirements. The file Requirements of External Providers is the current ABFM guideline for Part IV activities. The document includes Requirements of External Providers, Additional Requirements of External Providers (Part IV), and appendixes C, E, F, and G. The file MC-FP Data Service Description outlines the data exchange requirements for external providers. > > It is important to note that we are in the process of updating our Part IV requirements documentation to reflect changes made at our April Board meeting, where it was decided that the ABFM would proscribe commercial support for external activities and that the ABFM would require the use of nationally accepted indicators (e.g., PCPI, AQA, and NFQ) in QI activities. > > Also attached is the current external provider application that must be completed and submitted with each Part IV activity that is to be considered for approval. > > For more information about the ABFM’s Part IV activities (PPMs and the new MIMM), please see our Website at https://www.theabfm.org/moc/part4.aspx. The release date for the CPPM (Comprehensive PPM) that you mentioned in your message has been delayed until later this year. In a PPM, the physician is required to complete 10 chart reviews and have 10 patients complete a survey, and then manually enter data gathered. But in the CPPM, the physician will be able to input aggregate data and avoid having to complete the chart reviews and having the patients complete surveys. The MIMM activity is a Part IV activity that was designed for physicians to do not provide continuous care to patients (i.e., emergency room physicians, administrators, etc.). > > After reviewing the attached documents, if you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me by email at nlainhart@... or by phone at , extension 1230; or contact Dr. Hagen by email at hagen@... or by phone at , extension 1291. > > If you would like to contact me, I am usually in the office from 7:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. (EST). > > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:40 AM, > wrote: > A couple of us at IMP tried to talk to Leinhart a couple of yrs ago , indeed I have some emails from her saved somewhere. > Lynn Ho had tried to use HYH as an alternative part iV module and wrote up a great write up for them > ABFM declined and rather put us off- they kept saying- and due to my advanced age I will not get the words exactly right they said they were developing a new module and HYH might fit into it-- but every time we asked it was always being put off That is themodules they have now are disease specifc and they were develping a more general or overacrhing module I will not eplain it well was very nice but could not get the thing ot happen for us Nevertheless it was " to be developed " and eveytime we asked was being pushed out to some future date > > > This is absolultey the kind of thing that makes sense but I think noone has had the time or energy to go back to ABFM andwork with them > Volunteers anyone? > > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM, theNeighbors > wrote: > > If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230. > > > > From: <mailto: \ > [mailto: <mailto:@yahoogr\ oups.com>] On Behalf Of Pierce > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AM > To: <mailto: \ > > Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV > > > > Have any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements <https://www.theabfm.org/moc/index.aspx> for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data? > > I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time. > > Happy New Year, > Pierce > > > > > > -- > PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) > Email is best used for appointment making and brief questions > Email replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . > > > MD > > > ph fax > impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org> > > > > -- > PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) > Email is best used for appointment making and brief questions > Email replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . > > > MD > > > ph fax > impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org> > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2011 Report Share Posted January 4, 2011 thanks JIm! Jean I am one of four finalists to be on the ABFM staring in April. I have reason to believe that they are looking for new and interesting ways to be more interactive and dynamic in their recertification. If this occurs, I will be a newbee, but love to this as a way to do the certification. So we will see what comes of the process. ________________________________________From: [ ] On Behalf Of [jnantonucci@...] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 9:44 AM To: Subject: Re: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV Here is what she sent me 7-08Good afternoon, Dr. Antonucci,Thank you for your interest in the American Board of Family Medicine’s (ABFM) Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) program. I misunderstood your email address in your first voicemail message, so unfortunately my original email did not make it to you. Hopefully you will receive this message. For a module to be considered for approval as an alternate activity that will count toward ABFM Diplomates’ MC-FP requirements, it must satisfy specific standards and technical requirements. The file Requirements of External Providers is the current ABFM guideline for Part IV activities. The document includes Requirements of External Providers, Additional Requirements of External Providers (Part IV), and appendixes C, E, F, and G. The file MC-FP Data Service Description outlines the data exchange requirements for external providers. It is important to note that we are in the process of updating our Part IV requirements documentation to reflect changes made at our April Board meeting, where it was decided that the ABFM would proscribe commercial support for external activities and that the ABFM would require the use of nationally accepted indicators (e.g., PCPI, AQA, and NFQ) in QI activities. Also attached is the current external provider application that must be completed and submitted with each Part IV activity that is to be considered for approval.For more information about the ABFM’s Part IV activities (PPMs and the new MIMM), please see our Website at https://www.theabfm.org/moc/part4.aspx. The release date for the CPPM (Comprehensive PPM) that you mentioned in your message has been delayed until later this year. In a PPM, the physician is required to complete 10 chart reviews and have 10 patients complete a survey, and then manually enter data gathered. But in the CPPM, the physician will be able to input aggregate data and avoid having to complete the chart reviews and having the patients complete surveys. The MIMM activity is a Part IV activity that was designed for physicians to do not provide continuous care to patients (i.e., emergency room physicians, administrators, etc.). After reviewing the attached documents, if you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me by email at nlainhart@... or by phone at , extension 1230; or contact Dr. Hagen by email at hagen@... or by phone at , extension 1291. If you would like to contact me, I am usually in the office from 7:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. (EST). On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:40 AM, > wrote: A couple of us at IMP tried to talk to Leinhart a couple of yrs ago , indeed I have some emails from her saved somewhere.Lynn Ho had tried to use HYH as an alternative part iV module and wrote up a great write up for them ABFM declined and rather put us off- they kept saying- and due to my advanced age I will not get the words exactly right they said they were developing a new module and HYH might fit into it-- but every time we asked it was always being put off That is themodules they have now are disease specifc and they were develping a more general or overacrhing module I will not eplain it well was very nice but could not get the thing ot happen for us Nevertheless it was " to be developed " and eveytime we asked was being pushed out to some future date This is absolultey the kind of thing that makes sense but I think noone has had the time or energy to go back to ABFM andwork with themVolunteers anyone?On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM, theNeighbors > wrote: If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230. From: <mailto: > [mailto: <mailto: >] On Behalf Of Pierce Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AMTo: <mailto: > Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IVHave any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements <https://www.theabfm.org/moc/index.aspx> for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data? I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time.Happy New Year, Pierce--PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questionsEmail replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org>--PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questionsEmail replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org>------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2011 Report Share Posted January 4, 2011 thanks JIm! Jean I am one of four finalists to be on the ABFM staring in April. I have reason to believe that they are looking for new and interesting ways to be more interactive and dynamic in their recertification. If this occurs, I will be a newbee, but love to this as a way to do the certification. So we will see what comes of the process. ________________________________________From: [ ] On Behalf Of [jnantonucci@...] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 9:44 AM To: Subject: Re: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IV Here is what she sent me 7-08Good afternoon, Dr. Antonucci,Thank you for your interest in the American Board of Family Medicine’s (ABFM) Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) program. I misunderstood your email address in your first voicemail message, so unfortunately my original email did not make it to you. Hopefully you will receive this message. For a module to be considered for approval as an alternate activity that will count toward ABFM Diplomates’ MC-FP requirements, it must satisfy specific standards and technical requirements. The file Requirements of External Providers is the current ABFM guideline for Part IV activities. The document includes Requirements of External Providers, Additional Requirements of External Providers (Part IV), and appendixes C, E, F, and G. The file MC-FP Data Service Description outlines the data exchange requirements for external providers. It is important to note that we are in the process of updating our Part IV requirements documentation to reflect changes made at our April Board meeting, where it was decided that the ABFM would proscribe commercial support for external activities and that the ABFM would require the use of nationally accepted indicators (e.g., PCPI, AQA, and NFQ) in QI activities. Also attached is the current external provider application that must be completed and submitted with each Part IV activity that is to be considered for approval.For more information about the ABFM’s Part IV activities (PPMs and the new MIMM), please see our Website at https://www.theabfm.org/moc/part4.aspx. The release date for the CPPM (Comprehensive PPM) that you mentioned in your message has been delayed until later this year. In a PPM, the physician is required to complete 10 chart reviews and have 10 patients complete a survey, and then manually enter data gathered. But in the CPPM, the physician will be able to input aggregate data and avoid having to complete the chart reviews and having the patients complete surveys. The MIMM activity is a Part IV activity that was designed for physicians to do not provide continuous care to patients (i.e., emergency room physicians, administrators, etc.). After reviewing the attached documents, if you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me by email at nlainhart@... or by phone at , extension 1230; or contact Dr. Hagen by email at hagen@... or by phone at , extension 1291. If you would like to contact me, I am usually in the office from 7:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. (EST). On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:40 AM, > wrote: A couple of us at IMP tried to talk to Leinhart a couple of yrs ago , indeed I have some emails from her saved somewhere.Lynn Ho had tried to use HYH as an alternative part iV module and wrote up a great write up for them ABFM declined and rather put us off- they kept saying- and due to my advanced age I will not get the words exactly right they said they were developing a new module and HYH might fit into it-- but every time we asked it was always being put off That is themodules they have now are disease specifc and they were develping a more general or overacrhing module I will not eplain it well was very nice but could not get the thing ot happen for us Nevertheless it was " to be developed " and eveytime we asked was being pushed out to some future date This is absolultey the kind of thing that makes sense but I think noone has had the time or energy to go back to ABFM andwork with themVolunteers anyone?On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM, theNeighbors > wrote: If you don’t get a reply to your question about using HYH for ABFM part IV requirements contact Nichole Lainhart at nlainhart@... or at , ext. 1230. From: <mailto: > [mailto: <mailto: >] On Behalf Of Pierce Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:05 AMTo: <mailto: > Subject: Using How's Your Health to satisfy ABFM Maintenance of Certification Part IVHave any of the family docs here used HYH to meet to the American Board of Family Medicine's requirements <https://www.theabfm.org/moc/index.aspx> for a Part IV (quality improvement) module? Are any of the various module choices better suited for the HYH data? I want to add HYH to our practice and figure this might be a good way to take care of an ABFM requirement at the same time.Happy New Year, Pierce--PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questionsEmail replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org>--PATIENTS-please remember that email may not be entirely secure, and that Email is part of the medical record and is placed into your chart ( be careful what you say!) Email is best used for appointment making and brief questionsEmail replies can be expected within 24 hours-Please CALL if the matter is more urgent . MD ph fax impcenter.org<http://impcenter.org>------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.