Guest guest Posted June 17, 2012 Report Share Posted June 17, 2012 i have worked in radio devices, you are missing the latest tech stuff to introduce a radio into the body,quit using old stuff to do this with......carySubject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT - PA1 booster for the SSQ-2F v3.10 almost ready!To: Rife Date: Saturday, June 16, 2012, 1:06 PM Good news. If using an antenna tuner, can it be rated for 300 Watts or must you use one with the rating for 500 Watts PEAK? And what Freq rating/range must the Tuner have? Would this antenna tuner work? http://www.ebay.com/itm/EXCELLENT-DENTRON-3000-WATT-PEP-MT-2000A-1-8-30-MHZ-FULL-COVERAGE-ANTENNA-TUNER-/170859100276?pt=US_Radio_Comm_Tuners & hash=item27c7fef874 or http://www.ebay.com/itm/DENTRON-HEAVY-DUTY-AT-3K-3000-WATT-PEP-160-10-METER-COMPACT-ANTENNA-TUNER-/170859653145?pt=US_Radio_Comm_Tuners & hash=item27c8076819 DIY is nice and it would be nice, too, to have a already made up device from you as an alternative for those not wanting to build one. BTW for anyone interested in offering to share a machine of any kind or looking to find access to one, SKYPE me at (jmkane)as I am trying to setup a chat group just for people to coordinate meeting up to share devices. If enough people are in certain cities, I would recommend they setup a "Meetup" group and hold regular meetings http://www.meetup.com/ NOT a commercial chat on my Skype group, no spamming please > > Hello everyone! > > I am pleased to announce that after much development and testing the > Spectrotek model PA1 3.1 MHz High-Frequency Switch Mode Power Supply/RF > Amplifier will be ready for delivery within a few weeks. > > The PA1 is designed to be driven by the SSQ-2F v3.10. The PA1 increases > the power output of the SSQ-2F v3.10 to between 300 to 500 Watts peak > power. For modulation duty cycles between 0 to 100%, the PA1 will > produce at least 300 Watts output. For modulation duty cycles between 0 > to 50%, the PA1 can produce up to 500 Watts output. These power levels > are sufficient to operate even the largest plasma tubes now available. > > No modifications are necessary to the SSQ-2F v3.10 in order to drive the > PA1. It is quite possible, to mount both the SSQ-2F v3.10 and the PA1 on > the same heat sink assembly. This produces a small and compact unit. > What connected in this manner, the SSQ-2F v3.10 requires a single of 19 > V DC power supply for its operation, while the PA1 requires a DC voltage > of between 150 and 175 V DC. > > The PA1 is not a conventional RF power amplifier and it cannot be used > as such. It will not accept an RF drive signal from a conventional > transmitter, such as a CB radio. The PA1 is actually a high-frequency > power supply designed to convert DC power into square wave pulses of > energy at 3.1 MHz and at a high voltage. The PA1 has been designed so > that its output matches a 50 ohm load impedance, making it possible to > connect the output of the PA1 to a conventional antenna tuner or to my > 3.1 MHz link coil coupler. Due to the unconventional design of the PA1, > the output signal from the PA1 is just as good as the output signal from > the SSQ-2F v3.10, except at a much greater power level. > > Just as with the SSQ-2F v3.10, the PA1 requires use of a conventional > antenna tuner or my 3.1 MHz link coil coupler be connected between the > output of the PA1 and the plasma tube. > > The PA1 will be offered both as an assembled and tested unit and as a > kit for those who are comfortable with electronic assembly. > > Both the assembled version of the PA1 and the parts kit of the PA1 > include an electrically insulating, thermally conductive pad to place > between the PA1 amplifier transistor and the heat sink, and a heavy duty > rubber pressure pad for use in clamping the transistor firmly against > the heat sink. You will need to provide a suitable heat sink and a > clamping mechanism to hold the PA1 transistor against it. > > The PA1 will require a fairly substantial heat sink, preferably air > cooled. It must be capable of dissipating at least 150 Watts, or about > 471 BTU per hour. > > Although the operators manual for the PA1 is not quite ready, the > assembly manual for the PA1 kit is available for download at the > downloads page at my website http://rife-beam-ray.com. > > Tentative pricing for the PA1 is set at $75 for the assembled and tested > unit, $25 for the PA1 blank circuit board, and $25 for the complete PA1 > parts kit. Spare parts will also be available. > > Shipping charges for the PA1 have not yet been determined, but the PA1 > will fit into a smaller package than the SSQ-2F. If the PA1 is ordered > as a separate unit I should be able to ship it at a lower cost than the > SSQ-2F. If the PA1 is ordered at the same time that an SSQ-2F is > ordered, then the shipping cost will be only for the SSQ-2F since the > PA1 will be able to fit inside the same shipping box. > > If you are interested in obtaining one of the PA1 units, please send me > an email and I will put your name on the waiting list. There is no > obligation, and no payment is required until the unit is ready to ship > to you. Just as I did with the SSQ-2F v3.10, the waiting list will be on > a First in First out basis. I am planning on beginning delivery of the > PA1 within three weeks. Full information about the PA1 along with > ordering information will be put on my website http://rife-beam-ray.com. > > Yours truly, > > Ralph Hartwell > Spectrotek Services > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2012 Report Share Posted June 17, 2012 > If using an antenna tuner, can it be rated for 300 Watts or must you use > one with the rating for 500 Watts PEAK? Hello, The peak power coming from the amplifier is twice the average power if you are using a 50% duty cycle modulation. Most of the commercial antenna tuners are rated for SSB operation, which is roughly a 30% duty cycle. A tuner that is rated for 1KW operation would be more than adequate for use with the PA1. Both of the tuners you have provided links to are capable of more power than that, so either one would handle the power. However, because plasma tubes require a balanced line output, only the MT-2000 A which has a built in balun would work as is. The AT-3K tuner would require the addition of an external balun to provide the balanced line output to the plasma tube. But in terms of power handling capability, both of them would work fine. > And what Freq rating/range must the Tuner have? The SSQ-2F v3.10 in combination with the PA1 operates with either a 3.1 or 3.3 MHz carrier signal. The antenna tuner or matching network should be capable of working down to at least 3.0 MHz. Both of the antenna tuners you have linked to will operate down to 1.8 MHz, so they will both work. Most amateur radio antenna tuners are designed to work down to at least 1.8 MHz, so almost any of them should work well. > DIY is nice and it would be nice, too, to have an already made up device > from you as an alternative for those not wanting to build one. If you look on my website http://rife-beam-ray.com. There is a link to an early version of my 3.1 MHz link coil coupler. This is a very simple DIY tuning system which you can easily build. The hardest part to locate would be a variable capacitor of between 30 to 40 pF which you would need to tune the output coil to resonance. Depending on the time I have available, I may be able to furnish pre-wound coil assemblies for this tuner. I need to revise that page slightly, as there are a few variations of the design, which will improve the efficiency depending on what type of plasma tube you are using. Ralph Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2012 Report Share Posted June 17, 2012 royal used a pure sine wave carrier at 10.45mhz and am modulated his carrier with audio sine waves, square wave are no where the same as a sine wave,please be carefull with sq. waves alot of harmonics being generated,could be dangerous.There is a frequency which causes iron to be dumped from the red blood cells.people in russia found this out the hard way,on the project wood pecker. it cost them their lives and the project closed down as a result of that.....carySubject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT - PA1 booster for the SSQ-2F v3.10 almost ready!To: Rife Date: Saturday, June 16, 2012, 1:06 PM Good news. If using an antenna tuner, can it be rated for 300 Watts or must you use one with the rating for 500 Watts PEAK? And what Freq rating/range must the Tuner have? Would this antenna tuner work? http://www.ebay.com/itm/EXCELLENT-DENTRON-3000-WATT-PEP-MT-2000A-1-8-30-MHZ-FULL-COVERAGE-ANTENNA-TUNER-/170859100276?pt=US_Radio_Comm_Tuners & hash=item27c7fef874 or http://www.ebay.com/itm/DENTRON-HEAVY-DUTY-AT-3K-3000-WATT-PEP-160-10-METER-COMPACT-ANTENNA-TUNER-/170859653145?pt=US_Radio_Comm_Tuners & hash=item27c8076819 DIY is nice and it would be nice, too, to have a already made up device from you as an alternative for those not wanting to build one. BTW for anyone interested in offering to share a machine of any kind or looking to find access to one, SKYPE me at (jmkane)as I am trying to setup a chat group just for people to coordinate meeting up to share devices. If enough people are in certain cities, I would recommend they setup a "Meetup" group and hold regular meetings http://www.meetup.com/ NOT a commercial chat on my Skype group, no spamming please > > Hello everyone! > > I am pleased to announce that after much development and testing the > Spectrotek model PA1 3.1 MHz High-Frequency Switch Mode Power Supply/RF > Amplifier will be ready for delivery within a few weeks. > > The PA1 is designed to be driven by the SSQ-2F v3.10. The PA1 increases > the power output of the SSQ-2F v3.10 to between 300 to 500 Watts peak > power. For modulation duty cycles between 0 to 100%, the PA1 will > produce at least 300 Watts output. For modulation duty cycles between 0 > to 50%, the PA1 can produce up to 500 Watts output. These power levels > are sufficient to operate even the largest plasma tubes now available. > > No modifications are necessary to the SSQ-2F v3.10 in order to drive the > PA1. It is quite possible, to mount both the SSQ-2F v3.10 and the PA1 on > the same heat sink assembly. This produces a small and compact unit. > What connected in this manner, the SSQ-2F v3.10 requires a single of 19 > V DC power supply for its operation, while the PA1 requires a DC voltage > of between 150 and 175 V DC. > > The PA1 is not a conventional RF power amplifier and it cannot be used > as such. It will not accept an RF drive signal from a conventional > transmitter, such as a CB radio. The PA1 is actually a high-frequency > power supply designed to convert DC power into square wave pulses of > energy at 3.1 MHz and at a high voltage. The PA1 has been designed so > that its output matches a 50 ohm load impedance, making it possible to > connect the output of the PA1 to a conventional antenna tuner or to my > 3.1 MHz link coil coupler. Due to the unconventional design of the PA1, > the output signal from the PA1 is just as good as the output signal from > the SSQ-2F v3.10, except at a much greater power level. > > Just as with the SSQ-2F v3.10, the PA1 requires use of a conventional > antenna tuner or my 3.1 MHz link coil coupler be connected between the > output of the PA1 and the plasma tube. > > The PA1 will be offered both as an assembled and tested unit and as a > kit for those who are comfortable with electronic assembly. > > Both the assembled version of the PA1 and the parts kit of the PA1 > include an electrically insulating, thermally conductive pad to place > between the PA1 amplifier transistor and the heat sink, and a heavy duty > rubber pressure pad for use in clamping the transistor firmly against > the heat sink. You will need to provide a suitable heat sink and a > clamping mechanism to hold the PA1 transistor against it. > > The PA1 will require a fairly substantial heat sink, preferably air > cooled. It must be capable of dissipating at least 150 Watts, or about > 471 BTU per hour. > > Although the operators manual for the PA1 is not quite ready, the > assembly manual for the PA1 kit is available for download at the > downloads page at my website http://rife-beam-ray.com. > > Tentative pricing for the PA1 is set at $75 for the assembled and tested > unit, $25 for the PA1 blank circuit board, and $25 for the complete PA1 > parts kit. Spare parts will also be available. > > Shipping charges for the PA1 have not yet been determined, but the PA1 > will fit into a smaller package than the SSQ-2F. If the PA1 is ordered > as a separate unit I should be able to ship it at a lower cost than the > SSQ-2F. If the PA1 is ordered at the same time that an SSQ-2F is > ordered, then the shipping cost will be only for the SSQ-2F since the > PA1 will be able to fit inside the same shipping box. > > If you are interested in obtaining one of the PA1 units, please send me > an email and I will put your name on the waiting list. There is no > obligation, and no payment is required until the unit is ready to ship > to you. Just as I did with the SSQ-2F v3.10, the waiting list will be on > a First in First out basis. I am planning on beginning delivery of the > PA1 within three weeks. Full information about the PA1 along with > ordering information will be put on my website http://rife-beam-ray.com. > > Yours truly, > > Ralph Hartwell > Spectrotek Services > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2012 Report Share Posted June 18, 2012 > royal used a pure sine wave carrier at 10.45mhz and am modulated his carrier with audio sine waves, square wave are no where the same as a sine wave,please be carefull with sq. waves alot of harmonics being generated,could be dangerous.There is a frequency which causes iron to be dumped from the red blood cells.people in russia found this out the hard way,on the project Wood Pecker. it cost them their lives and the project closed down as a result of that.....cary Hello Cary and everyone, I haven't seen any documentation of rife using a 10.45 MHz carrier, but I have seen a lot of documentation showing that he did use pulsed waveforms. Likewise, I'm not aware of any frequencies affecting red blood cells. However, I could easily have missed that information because the amount of information out there is so large. I'd appreciate any links you have on these items so that I can bring myself up to date on them. As a broadcast engineer for many years, and amateur radio operator, I'm well aware of the old Russian Woodpecker over the horizon radar system. It caused us great amounts of interference. We used to listen to it for hours on end while we were trying to make contacts. A few more aggressive amateur radio operators modified their transmitters so they would echo back the Woodpecker signal to the Russians. Apparently, this caused the Russians some problems, since after a few minutes of retransmitting the Woodpecker signal back to them, they would shift frequency. What fun! Just in case you or anyone else on the list would like something to read on a warm summer evening, I have included some links for you here. Here are some good links to get started with - The Rife Forum is excellent for learning about different systems. You can access it through the web interface (best), or if you want read only, through Yahoo Groups email. Free registration on the Rife Forum is required to post messages, but you can read with no registration. http://www.rifeforum.com The thread about my unit on the Rife Forum is at: http://www.rifeforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4425 My web page about using my prototype SSQ board in a Rife system is at this here: http://w5jgv.com/rife/2011_Rife_Beam-Ray_System A must-read historical data site is: http://rifevideos.com This page gives the final data in a few pages: http://rifevideos.com/dr_rife_and_philip_hoylands_3.3mhz_sweep.html To understand where the results in the above link were derived, read the data in the link below. If you never read anything else about Rife, you must read this work: http://rifevideos.com/pdf/a_history/the_rife_machine_report_a_history_of_rifes_i\ nstruments_and_frequencies.pdf Be sure to read Chapter 17, " Summary of the Rife Machine Report, " for the latest information before you begin building a Rife Machine. Take care, Ralph Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.