Guest guest Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 http://aac.asm.org/cgi/content/full/52/10/3517Weak electric currents generated using conductive electrodes have been shown to increase the efficacy of antibiotics against bacterial biofilms, a phenomenon termed " the bioelectric effect. " The purposes of the present study were (i) to find out whether insulated electrodes that generate electric fields without " ohmic " electric currents, and thus are not associated with the formation of metal ions and free radicals, can inhibit the growth of planktonic bacteria and (ii) to define the parameters that are most effective against bacterial growth. The results obtained indicate that electric fields generated using insulated electrodes can inhibit the growth of planktonic Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and that the effect is amplitude and frequency dependent, with a maximum at 10 MHz. The combined effect of the electric field and chloramphenicol was found to be additive. Several possible mechanisms underlying the observed effect, as well as its potential clinical uses, are discussed. The use of physical means as an aid for modern medicine in the continuous battle against pathogenic microorganisms holds new prospects that only recently have begun to be widely recognized. Light sources of various types are being used for photodynamic therapy in dentistry and dermatology (10, 13, 33). Ultrasound waves are used for human dental plaque removal (16) and, in combination with antibiotics, for the eradication of bacterial biofilms in vitro and in vivo (3, 7, 19, 21). In addition, thermotherapy, originally developed as a tool against cancerous tumors, has been found to be effective against cutaneous leishmaniasis (22). The major drawback of the methods mentioned above is their limited selectivity; thus, ultrasonic waves and thermotherapy nonspecifically produce heat that may cause severe collateral damage. Similarly, the illumination of the photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy can harm tissues in the vicinity of the target area. Other downsides of photodynamic therapy include the need to deliver the photosensitizers to the treated area and the low tissue penetration of the radiation, limiting the application of this treatment to topical infections (13, 14). The use of an additional physical means, weak electric currents, to inhibit bacterial growth was suggested by Rosenberg et al. (24), who observed that electrolysis resulted in the arrest of Escherichia coli cell division. Further investigation of this phenomenon revealed that transition platinum complexes produced at the platinum electrodes during electrolysis were responsible for the bacterial growth inhibition. These derivatives were found not to be specific to bacteria; they were also toxic to human cells. In fact, this work eventually led to the discovery of the known chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin (25). In the years to follow, it was demonstrated that low-intensity electric currents, mostly direct current (DC) (1, 5, 20, 31, 32), as well as alternating electric fields of as much as 10 MHz (4, 18), can enhance the efficacy of antibacterial agents against bacterial biofilms. In all of these studies, the electric currents were generated using conductive electrodes, allowing for the formation of metal ions and free radicals at the electrode surface. Like cisplatin, these products are toxic to human cells, and therefore the use of such electric currents was limited. Recently it was demonstrated that low-intensity alternating electric fields at frequencies of 100 to 200 kHz can inhibit the growth of proliferating cancerous cell lines, both in vitro and in vivo, without affecting normal quiescent cells (11, 12). These fields, termed " tumor-treating fields " (TTFields), were generated by means of electrically insulated ceramic electrodes, thus ensuring that during the application of the field there is no electrolysis and that no biocides or ions are produced at the electrode surface and released into the medium. Clinical investigations, supported by in vitro studies, have demonstrated the safety of the use of TTFields. Evidence was presented indicating that the mechanism at the basis of this inhibitory effect was related to the unidirectional dielectrophoresis forces produced by the nonhomogeneous electric fields generated in the vicinity of the cleavage plain that gradually develops and separates the newly formed daughter cells from each other. Since a similar process occurs in rapidly replicating prokaryotic organisms, it is reasonable to assume that they can be targeted by appropriately tuned electric fields. The field parameters required for affecting bacteria are expected to be significantly different from those affecting mammalian cells due to the significant differences in size (see Kirson et al. [11]). In view of these considerations, the objectives of the present study were to test the feasibility of using alternating electric fields generated by insulated electrodes for the inhibition of planktonic bacteria and to define the effective field parameters for the inhibition process. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.