Re: OT: Flagyl - is it worthless?/432 for Babesia - is it also worthless?

[Guest guest]

honestly, i am not experiencing any type of seasonal flare-up and i began BARE/rife sessions about 4 or 5 weeks ago and making progress...

also, the way my LLMD explained to me is that flagyl simply bust up the biofilms so that meds can reach them...my personal experience is that once he began throwing in flagyl once a week, all of the babesia symptoms began to FULLY surface....and that was when we started going after the babesia aggressively...and since then, through a zyto energetic frequency reader, it showed i have a zillion babesia strains...of course, lots of bartonella, too and pretty much every single lyme co-infection that one can have...which just confirmed what we already thought to be the case..

thought i would share what my personal experience had been with flagyl busting up biofilms and that as far as i know, i've never had a seasonal lyme flare-up...

hope everyone begins to get some relief and feels better!

warmly,

-anne davis

It makes me wonder re: Flagyl killing cysts, I've been on/off it for several months because I contracted c diff for the 2nd time from long term abx use, and this was the worst fall flare up I've ever felt. If the flagyl is supposed to kill the cyst form, I shouldn't feel the way I've been feeling. It's the worst I've felt in 3 years.

From:

Stolar

To:

lyme_and_rife

Date:

09/26/2010 01:44 PM

Subject:

Flagyl - is it worthless?/432 for Babesia - is it also worthless?

Sent by:

Lyme_and_Rife

I never took Flagyl, but some evidence exists that it is useless against lyme cysts. My reasoning is - if you use Flagy and it kills the cyst form of lyme, would you ever have any seasonal lyme flare-ups? I would argue that you would not have seasonal flare-ups if Flagyl worked as advertised, but many, if not all, people who use Flagyl, have strong flare-ups if they are not using any drugs or supplements that may inhibit the flare-up from happening. Any experiences out there? Another similar issue is that almost all frequency lists have 432 listed for Babesia. I coiled for lyme for 3 months when all herxing stopped, but then coiled every 2 weeks for another 3 months until lyme symptoms disappeared. Bartonella showed up about 10 days later and then months later, Babesia appeared. The question is - if 432 kills Babesia, why would anyone get Babesia after using 432

for months to kill off lyme? The obvious answer is that 432 does nothing for Babesia. I am guessing that 432 got into the lists in error (mistaking lyme for Babesia) and will stay there forever. I discovered that I have Haemophylus influenzae (it causes sinus and ear infections) but probably had it for decades. I used Nina Silver's book and the CAFL list and tried 542 (full body for 34 minutes total) and herxed very strongly. The point of mentioning this is that I have found the CAFL list to be surprisingly accurate in all cases for non-tick disease issues. The most difficult part is to determine what bug you have.

Any U.S. tax advice contained in the body of this e-mail was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.________________________________________________________________________The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to

the message and deleting it from your computer. Notice required by law: This e-mail may constitute an advertisement or solicitation under U.S. law, if its primary purpose is to advertise or promote a commercial product or service. You may choose not to receive advertising and promotional messages from Ernst & Young LLP (except for Ernst & Young Online and the ey.com website, which track e-mail preferences through a separate process) at this e-mail address by forwarding this message to no-more-mail@.... If you do so, the sender of this message will be notified promptly. Our principal postal address is 5 Times Square, New York, NY 10036. Thank you. Ernst & Young LLP

-- Whitney Schmucker