Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Zyto Interpretation Addl Comments

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Tami,

Thank you so much for this GREAT explanation. I went back to the Zyto

spreadsheet in our Files and now see further things that I wanted to bring

forward for your additional comments. I am only going to use the Lyme and

Measles, though there are many other examples on this spreadsheet.

On the one in the Files, the Zyto/practioner recommended LDM-100 as one of the

supplements, so with your explanation to the right number was probably testing

the LDM-100 and the other stuff recommended at the time against the organism.

10/30/08 2 wks prior to LDM-100

-172.94 9.48 Borrelia i

-17.31 14.21 Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR)

LDM-100 started 11/14/08

11/19/08 Zyto

1465.98 Lyme Disease

-272.02 Lymes nosode

-310.63 Measles

11/24/08 Zyto

-105.68 Babesia Microti

197.2 Borrelia Burgdorferi

341.57 Borrelia Burgdorferi (Lyme)

-139.31 Measles

12/10/08 Zyto

50.54 -68.1 Babesia Microti Nos.

-29.33 -13.29 Bartonella Bacilliformis

25.88 -13.63 Borrelia

35.87 -9.23 Borrelia Burgdorferi (Lyme)

28.12 7.83 Borrelia i

64.51 -17.21 Brucella Melitensis

So now in light of what you explained, my mom's perspective is seeing the Lyme

stress organism as -172.94 (after the recommended supplements to be 9.48 for the

Borrelia i). What ended up happening on the supplement was the Lyme went

up, additional Lyme organisms were provoked and showed up as stressors to the

body, leaving the original Borrelia i under stress detection limits

therefore it got removed from the subsequent stressor list....reaching it's goal

of 9.48.

As the additional Babesia and Borrelia organisms were exposed (or provoked) the

supplement continued to work on the now exposed organisms.

With the report you just posted there were several different Lyme species, none

as major stressors, but combined it appears that the load could provoke to be a

pretty sizable stressor in and of itself. Here's the " Borrelia family " alone

that I picked out:

25.60 -18.97 Borrelia Duttonii

-28.88 -16.92 Borrelia Burgdorferi (Lyme)

-33.28 -11.55 Borrelia i

28.81 -9.87 Borrelia Berbera

40.84 -7.23 Borrelia ii

-30.61 3.24 Borrelia Burgdorferi

34.64 8.54 Borrelia i

27.41 10.29 Borrelia Hermsii

In light of your explanation, the total Lyme load seems quite a bit, not

stressing much now, but to me seems a concern, even to the positive that it is

even picking it up in the body. If you add them all up (ignoring the – stressors

and seeing them all as potential stressors) the number is 250.07 just for the

Borrelia. So it apprears to me that in interpreting the report the negative plus

the large positive, plus additionally the large number of combined organisms in

a " family " may also be a " total body burden " stress...especially giving what a

provocation may come forward as the organism is exposed....

This brings to mind how important it will be to work with someone that

understands the " total body burden " ..including potential provoked " ...

Also, in comparing these 2 Zyto models, it will be interesting to follow the

provoked Zyto reports, This Zyto research project is going to be SO

interesting!!! I can't wait to see the results as we follow these. Up until now

we have been basing so much on the outward behavioral symptoms, now we can

follow the organisms themselves too…WOW!!!

Your comments are greatly appreciated!

Rita

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...