Guest guest Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Tami, Thank you so much for this GREAT explanation. I went back to the Zyto spreadsheet in our Files and now see further things that I wanted to bring forward for your additional comments. I am only going to use the Lyme and Measles, though there are many other examples on this spreadsheet. On the one in the Files, the Zyto/practioner recommended LDM-100 as one of the supplements, so with your explanation to the right number was probably testing the LDM-100 and the other stuff recommended at the time against the organism. 10/30/08 2 wks prior to LDM-100 -172.94 9.48 Borrelia i -17.31 14.21 Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) LDM-100 started 11/14/08 11/19/08 Zyto 1465.98 Lyme Disease -272.02 Lymes nosode -310.63 Measles 11/24/08 Zyto -105.68 Babesia Microti 197.2 Borrelia Burgdorferi 341.57 Borrelia Burgdorferi (Lyme) -139.31 Measles 12/10/08 Zyto 50.54 -68.1 Babesia Microti Nos. -29.33 -13.29 Bartonella Bacilliformis 25.88 -13.63 Borrelia 35.87 -9.23 Borrelia Burgdorferi (Lyme) 28.12 7.83 Borrelia i 64.51 -17.21 Brucella Melitensis So now in light of what you explained, my mom's perspective is seeing the Lyme stress organism as -172.94 (after the recommended supplements to be 9.48 for the Borrelia i). What ended up happening on the supplement was the Lyme went up, additional Lyme organisms were provoked and showed up as stressors to the body, leaving the original Borrelia i under stress detection limits therefore it got removed from the subsequent stressor list....reaching it's goal of 9.48. As the additional Babesia and Borrelia organisms were exposed (or provoked) the supplement continued to work on the now exposed organisms. With the report you just posted there were several different Lyme species, none as major stressors, but combined it appears that the load could provoke to be a pretty sizable stressor in and of itself. Here's the " Borrelia family " alone that I picked out: 25.60 -18.97 Borrelia Duttonii -28.88 -16.92 Borrelia Burgdorferi (Lyme) -33.28 -11.55 Borrelia i 28.81 -9.87 Borrelia Berbera 40.84 -7.23 Borrelia ii -30.61 3.24 Borrelia Burgdorferi 34.64 8.54 Borrelia i 27.41 10.29 Borrelia Hermsii In light of your explanation, the total Lyme load seems quite a bit, not stressing much now, but to me seems a concern, even to the positive that it is even picking it up in the body. If you add them all up (ignoring the – stressors and seeing them all as potential stressors) the number is 250.07 just for the Borrelia. So it apprears to me that in interpreting the report the negative plus the large positive, plus additionally the large number of combined organisms in a " family " may also be a " total body burden " stress...especially giving what a provocation may come forward as the organism is exposed.... This brings to mind how important it will be to work with someone that understands the " total body burden " ..including potential provoked " ... Also, in comparing these 2 Zyto models, it will be interesting to follow the provoked Zyto reports, This Zyto research project is going to be SO interesting!!! I can't wait to see the results as we follow these. Up until now we have been basing so much on the outward behavioral symptoms, now we can follow the organisms themselves too…WOW!!! Your comments are greatly appreciated! Rita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.