Experimenting with unproven devices - Jim

[Guest guest]

Hi Jim,

I want to expound upon my last post, to say that I totally understand your concern about people using "unproven" devices. But I would point out, that if people only used "proven" devices, then no advancements in treatment options would ever take place.

Everyone in our group is experimenting, whether it be with "proven" devices or otherwise. If people are moved to try something out, it's good to consider all the info and claims available on that protocol, as well as feedback from users. At a certain point though, it is my belief that people need to make a leap of faith, and follow their own intution.

Everyone's inner guide is different, as each and every one of us is unique. What works for one, may not work for another, and vice versa. Some claims and feedback info on particular protocols (i.e., the Marshall Protocol) is dubious. At first, that protocol looked promising, and reported on its benefits. But over time, the evidence has piled up, indicating that this protocol could be potentially dangerous and harmful.

I have seen no such evidence that Meissner Research devices are not performing as claimed. Perhaps it is too soon to tell, and more evidence will emerge later on. For people who want to wait a few more years to see what develops, that's fine. For those who want to take the plunge now, that's also fine. Either way, people need honest data, in order to make an informed choice. That's what I've tried to provide.

Best,

Jane