Guest guest Posted June 19, 2005 Report Share Posted June 19, 2005 For a next starter, this post is (for alphabetical order) for/to Dan, Greg, , and Steve, with a p.s. to Heward and , from the other two lists. Dan and Steve, my 'special appreciations to you for your occasional (and always prompt) responses to my over-the-years sporadic postings. Greg and , I have always read your posts with " engaged interest " (a kind of klutzy phrase?!). That's the, might I say (?) " yang " of this my this morning's list of the people I would much hope/wish to talk to and with, in direct engagement. Meanwhile, some of the topics here do feel to me to kind of " sworl " (for one of my private-language preferred worlds) far distant from my single ability to deal with them in any simple, immediate, way. But -- in the spirit of the best of inquiry (Jung's or any one else's), here's for a bit of what (over on junglist, in a different context, some of us have been responding to my image of " marte's tip- of-the-iceberg " ).... " Full Disclaimer " : of the people I know personally on this list, Alice is the only face-to-face [and that somewhat peripheral] acquaintance; of the cyberspace acquaintances prime in some of these yin/yang battings, Toni. Others of the " yin " among the group I'm hoping to get back in touch with are many, and I'll hope to get some posts off to many of you (maybe off-list so as not to be too long). For the moment, I'm caught up with some of the themes much posted back-and-forth among Dan-Greg--Steve and -- so often, Toni (with whom, Toni, thanks so much for yesterday's lovely off-list poolside party conversation! My " yin/yang " sense of this (in part) is (without wanting to be grossly simplistic about the " yin/yang " ) well -- let me cite a long ago Readers Digest joke, o.k.? He: " The trouble with you _women_ is, you take everything [so] personally! She: " _I_ don't " ??!! So, see, I'm a little neither-here-nor-there right this morning. and Dan exchange posts about law and bedroom and other people argue about (for a maybe shortcut here, 'theology') of abortion laws, sex-gender politics, and I'm sitting here thinking about some of my very private and personal experiences in all these realms -- my own bedroom(s), my friends who've had abortions, my -- call them whatever you wish -- " gay " , " homosexual " friends -- and, yes, seeing this topic recently came up, my closest next door neighbor who is, in fact, a " fundy " who is one of my most treasured friends and supports until (or unless, or in spite of that) she starts sounding off about " the Lord " . [i love her dearly and know her well, so I can laugh with affectionate pleasure when she surprises me some times after I somewhat naively confess to my trusting love of her something that offends her theology, such as that I once had no notion of the meaning of " Satan " , and she replies, " oh, marte, YOU JUST HAVE TO READ THE BIBLE!! " ] So today is, for me, by " virtual time " , a long day, and for that I do apologise (an apparently psychology-incorrect word these days) for such a long post. Appreciations to all for your many sharings, and hoping and looking forward to some further more direct exchanges between me and many of you, marte hall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.