Guest guest Posted December 31, 2002 Report Share Posted December 31, 2002 An e-group friend of mine (and many other folk on e-groups) Maynard Berkovitch from San Francisco wrote these words which I thought worth putting on as an item of knowledge for some and a recap for others - again I have an understanding that I can use his info. I'll leave you to do the translation from $ to £. Some of you may wish to add to this. It does underline the differences between the UK's NHS and the USA's private health systems as well as starting to explain what Casodex does differently to Zoledex or Lupron. " A very good food for prostate cancer is testosterone. Mainly this is from the testicles. So the first treatment for a failed primary treatment or advanced treatment is the use of hormone therapy. This is intended to knock the testosterone down to very low numbers. There are two drugs that do this very well. The first Lupron, and the second Zoladex. There is a difference in their administration, and a small difference in their cost, but both do essentially the same thing. They are LHRH Agonists. They both send signals to the pituitary gland to produce more testosterone. This causes a flare reaction, and one's testosterone rises very quickly to very high levels, thus feeding the cancer. To eliminate the flare, take Casodex or Flutamide for a couple of weeks before getting the LHRH agonist. But eventually, after say a week or 10 days, this signal is ignored by the prostate, and it stops producing testosterone. Usually testosterone will drop to castrate level within a month or less. Casodex or Flutamide is used to prevent this flare reaction. The other drug used is an anti-androgen, usually Casodex or Flutamide. They both block the cancers ability to take up the testosterone. I like to explain this as like putting one hundred black marbles into the hat. Your chances of pulling a black marble out of the hat would be 100%. Now if we were to also place 900 white marbles in addition to the 100 black marbles and fished for a marble, it would only be a 10% chance of getting a black marble. And if we were to put 9,900 white marbles along with 100 black marbles, the chance of getting a black marble would only 1%. Casodex and Flutamide work like the white marbles, and testosterone works like the black marbles. The cancer takes up the Casodex or Flutamide just as well as testosterone, but it cannot be used for food. Now, after one month or so, the testicular testosterone should be at a very low level, and probably would not serve as much food for the cancer. However, your wife, and virtually every woman in the world has testosterone in their bodies. This is not from their testicles, but is derived from their adrenal glands. The adrenal glands don't actually produce testosterone, but another even more powerful food for prostate cancer called Dihydrotestosterone (DHT for short). So, going back to the marbles, one way to block the cancers ability to grab this DHT is to continue on Casodex or Flutamide. The physical castration has no advantage over chemical castration, except cost. And a big disadvantage is that physical castration is non-reversible. If they ever find a cure for this bastardly disease, you will still have your testicles, whereas if they are chopped off, you will not have them. Cost of drugs for chemical castration is about $500 to 600 per month, month in and month out, probably for the rest of your life. The physical castration has only a one time cost of about $10,000. However if you have a drug plan or Medicare that picks up the cost of Lupron of Zoladex, cost should not be a factor. This is a complicated process, on the affect of anti-androgen and an LHRH agonist, and I hope that my explanation did it justice. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.