[Fwd: Re: being that the reason why MS is still ambiguous...]

February 22, 2006

Carol,

You sent this to me privately, don't know if you did by accident, I

tried to write you back privately but your yahoo account does not work.

If you need help learning how to send mail to the group just ask.

cah819 wrote:

>,

>I agree with you 100%! My Neuro's assistant just told me yesterday

>that, (if they bring Tysabri back), I should consider taking it. I

>just did some research on it in PubMed and I wouldn't touch it with

>a 10 foot pole, because it blocks part of the action of the immune

>system. Three people died after taking it, because they got JC

>virus. It seems almost obvious to me that these people already had

>JC virus and their immune systems were keeping them alive....sick,

>but alive. When the Tysabri blocked their immune systems, the JC

>virus had totally control and killed them.

>

>My Neuro now says, (since the last seminar he attended), they

>believe within 15 years, they will find that 75% of people now

>diagnosed with MS, actually have something else. I say it's 100%.

>MS is not a disease in and of itself. It's simply the name they've

>given a loosely related set of neurological symptoms, in people

>they are unable to diagnose correctly. MS means multiple sclerosis,

>of course, which is simply a term for scarring of the myelin. Lots

>of things can scar the myelin.

>

>Until they give up the idea that our bodies are simply attacking

>themselves, their drugs won't be successful, because they're

>focusing on stopping that attack. I believe most of us have some

>pathogenic bacteria, virus etc. that is causing our immune systems

>to react and try to kill it. In the process, we are being damaged.

>But, they need to start working on ways to help our immune systems,

>not block them!

>Carol

>

Recommended Posts