Re: Questioning the motives of others

[Guest guest]

I was really confused as to what this message was all about, so I went to

the Website. Toni, why are you apologising when you did nothing wrong? And

, are you *trying* to cause trouble? Maybe you are bored now that

has cleaned up the other list?

Playtime over, children! Alice should start giving out detentions, LOL!

fa

Questioning the motives of others

> Dear anima mundi,

> .

> I have been accused of:

> " new members " ? But you weren't replying to a new member, were you?

> Toni, I don't know if Ghazaleh felt patronized. I surely do, once

> again...

>

> I answered to the person whose name was on the post.( If it is you ,

Ghazaleh, I had no idea,but I would have written as I did.) I would never be

" patronizing " . In this case exactly the opposite, impressed.. I was taken by

the depth of your practice. Please do not take anyone's word for my motives.

As I said, I loved your letter. and only meant to contrasti my own practice.

>

> Let us have no one disturb the peace between us from long ago.If you are

Ghazaleh.my love to you,

>

> Toni

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

fa dear,

Not apologizing at all. I did nothing to apologize for. I just didn't want

any " bad air " floating around, so I explained.

I really do not to wait until I transgress here before I apologize, but I am so

used to keeping the peace in my family, I do this without thinking.( with me

that's a mother-keep- the- peace sort of thing I haven't discarded yet.

Well we are having a family reunion all 15( depending on divorce dates) or more

of us in June and I may need that skill to keep the peace.(Kids are from 21-9

years.)

(By the way, it wouldn't be the first time I have gotten a detention...I have an

interesting(?) past.

much love,

Toni

Questioning the motives of others

> Dear anima mundi,

> .

> I have been accused of:

> " new members " ? But you weren't replying to a new member, were you?

> Toni, I don't know if Ghazaleh felt patronized. I surely do, once

> again...

>

> I answered to the person whose name was on the post.( If it is you ,

Ghazaleh, I had no idea,but I would have written as I did.) I would never be

" patronizing " . In this case exactly the opposite, impressed.. I was taken by

the depth of your practice. Please do not take anyone's word for my motives.

As I said, I loved your letter. and only meant to contrasti my own practice.

>

> Let us have no one disturb the peace between us from long ago.If you are

Ghazaleh.my love to you,

>

> Toni

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Toni, all,

I shouldn't have mentioned Ghazaleh's name. Also, where I could have

replied to you Toni with one harmless sentence, " The paradoxes, to

me, are really so. " I added on accusation and more.

I'm sorry.

fa, you wrote, " Maybe you are bored now that has cleaned

up the other list? "

No, but there's no reason I can't see the same line in the sand here too.

regards,

[Guest guest]

Dear ,

I am learning to write a post on one day and mail it on the next. I get to throw

out some posts I would be better off not sending, for the recipient, the group

and me..I do this especially when I know it is an old adversary I am

corresponding with.

You have some issues with who you think I am, and what I portray. I was once

thought to have them with others also. I suppose I could hide behind, " others do

it too " , but I really can't. was right about that when he last wrote to

me about another poster.

Sometimes we just don't read what the other writes because we think we already

know what he is going to say...at least I do.

So we will agree to disagree...but lets do it on the basis of what is actually

written then on 4-5 years of the past.WE have been through this many times

before.

I , of course forgive, you and myself too. When hot button issues come up, I

still find it hard to restrain myself.I will try however, even if I have to turn

off my computer.

The line in the sand I see, is the one of courtesy, and staying close to the

Fire. It has always been a reminder to be kind as well as right. Hard to do, eh?

Toni

Re: Questioning the motives of others

Toni, all,

I shouldn't have mentioned Ghazaleh's name. Also, where I could have

replied to you Toni with one harmless sentence, " The paradoxes, to

me, are really so. " I added on accusation and more.

I'm sorry.

fa, you wrote, " Maybe you are bored now that has cleaned

up the other list? "

No, but there's no reason I can't see the same line in the sand here too.

regards,