Guest guest Posted March 21, 2002 Report Share Posted March 21, 2002 Being a Rottwieler owner myself, this has a flip side. It's another news story where a certain breed of dog will be targeted as " Mean " or " Dangerous " . The media needs to make sure that they place blame correctly; on the people and/or circumstances that made these animals killers. Domestic dogs by nature and companions. Just like your husband or wife or partner; they'll be a kind companion for the duration of their life, but they'll also defend you when they perceive you're threatened. They don't know violence, or jealously, or how to reason. They do what they're trained to do. I sometimes wonder if I was being chased by a police dog, if I turned around, got on one knee and said " here boy!!! " if they'd come and cuddle with me. My dog wouldn't hurt a fly, yet when I went shopping for homeowner's insurance awhile back, I was denied from my first choice of company because of my dog. He was considered a " high risk " breed. Yet, more people are injured by Jack Terriers each year than they are by Rottwielers. This was a tragic situation; there's no denying that. My prayers go out to the lovely lady whose life was stripped from her, and also to the lady who likely will spend the rest of her life in prison because she made the mistake of thinking she could control an animal that she couldn't. She certainly will not have the opportunity to make that mistake again. ************************************************************************ ***************************** Tammy B baltazar@... Windows Messenger - tbscsoccer@... OT-In the news... Well, I'd like to say that certain prayers of mine were certainly answered today. I just heard the news on TV... Without wanting to incite a controversy, let me offer my most heartfelt prayers for the dear lady who was killed by the dog in San Francisco, and her partner. May God bless everyone involved... Ava Lee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2002 Report Share Posted March 21, 2002 I agree Tammy, this can be such a controversial topic. I bet its frustrating when your beloved pet gets a bad rap because of bad pet owners. We had many dogs when I was growing up. With all of them we went through obedience training and they not only stayed in a kennel outside when we were not around, but the kennel was inside a 6 foot cedar fence. They were very gentle dogs with us but protective of us around strangers and we were keenly aware of that. I get upset with people who are really careless. I don't let my kids go up to strange dogs in the park or whatever. Even if the owners believe that it is OK. As wonderful as some of our family dogs are they are still unpredictable animals. My step mother has a dog that has nipped at my girls on several occasions. Not a friendly nip either but a " get away from me " sort of thing. My stepmom still goes " Oh don't worry he will never really bite them. " How can she be so sure? She gets mad at me when I ask that he be put outside while we are there. That is the sort of stuff that makes me so frustrated. I was mualed by a bull terrier when I wandered in to a neighbors back yard (I was 8 at the time). The dog was loosely tied up and broke the rope. This was an unfenced yard in a neighborhood full of children. I just wish people would be more aware of potential dangers. -- OT-In the news... Well, I'd like to say that certain prayers of mine were certainly answered today. I just heard the news on TV... Without wanting to incite a controversy, let me offer my most heartfelt prayers for the dear lady who was killed by the dog in San Francisco, and her partner. May God bless everyone involved... Ava Lee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2002 Report Share Posted March 21, 2002 TAMMY--I did not post what I posted in order to start a controversy, though I do disagree with your 'flip' side. I will never believe that ANY animal is 'by nature and(are) companions. Just like your husband or wife or partner: they'll be a kind companion for the rest of their life, but they'll also defend you when they perceive you're threatened. They don't know violence or jealously(jealousy)'... In NONE of the three dog cases--which by no means are the only ones-- were the dogs or owners of the dogs being threatened by ANYONE. Animals are animals and people are people. The mistake comes when the animal owners THINK their animals are as nice or thinking as people can be--and by attributing human characteristics to them. There is jealousy even among my 3 cats--and two of them are related! (And they can get into it, or tear up the house, whether or I is present or not!) Animals are animals, and their violence quotient is not something that is thoroughly understood or able to be predicted. (Our cats are wonderful and have NEVER hurt us--but if they're upset about something, or into it with each other, we NEVER would grab them and hold them up to our face for lovies the way we usually do. That would be foolish! And we'd NEVER allow them to be held by a child or toddler. Why? Because they might act like the animals they are and possibly scratch someone, or try to get away! That's what cats do!) Cats are cats, and dogs are dogs--and many dogs who have never been 'trained' to attack ANYTHING are perfectly able to maul or bite someone who has, or has NOT, provoked them! I understand that you feel quite differently about this--and that's fine. My post was actually intended to be more of a prayer for the victims who lost their lives rather than a diatribe... As you'll notice, I DID finish up with the statement 'How can PEOPLE be so careless...'; the dogs were just being the animals that they are, their behavior was perfectly within keeping with the range of behavior that animals are capable of. I agree that it was their OWNERS who had so drastically underestimated what could possibly happen. Please, don't think that your dogs are just like anyone's 'husband or wife or partner'--they are NOT human with human characteristics--and it's a mistake to think so. And don't try and 'cuddle with a police dog' if you find yourself being chased by one (and they HAVE been trained to attack in such circumstances!) I'd hate to have anything happen to you! Animals can easily act outside of their training or usual behavior-- and no one knows why! Perhaps it's because they only have actions rather than words with which to communicate... They are not wrong for having animal attributes--and it doesn't cost anyone anything to assume their dogs could POSSIBLY act like dogs and to, thus, take special precautions when allowing them access to non- family members--even being a bit overly cautious. (I'm sure the lives of the 3 dead people I mentioned were worth a little extra fencing/wood/or supervision.) Good luck with yours... Ava Lee In GastricBypass-InfoCentral@y..., " Tammy Baltazar " <baltazar@w...> wrote: > Being a Rottwieler owner myself, this has a flip side. It's another > news story where a certain breed of dog will be targeted as " Mean " or > " Dangerous " . The media needs to make sure that they place blame > correctly; on the people and/or circumstances that made these animals > killers. Domestic dogs by nature and companions. Just like your husband > or wife or partner; they'll be a kind companion for the duration of > their life, but they'll also defend you when they perceive you're > threatened. They don't know violence, or jealously, or how to reason. > They do what they're trained to do. I sometimes wonder if I was being > chased by a police dog, if I turned around, got on one knee and said > " here boy!!! " if they'd come and cuddle with me. > > My dog wouldn't hurt a fly, yet when I went shopping for homeowner's > insurance awhile back, I was denied from my first choice of company > because of my dog. He was considered a " high risk " breed. Yet, more > people are injured by Jack Terriers each year than they are by > Rottwielers. > > This was a tragic situation; there's no denying that. My prayers go out > to the lovely lady whose life was stripped from her, and also to the > lady who likely will spend the rest of her life in prison because she > made the mistake of thinking she could control an animal that she > couldn't. She certainly will not have the opportunity to make that > mistake again. > > ********************************************************************** ** > ***************************** > Tammy B > baltazar@w... > Windows Messenger - tbscsoccer@h... > > OT-In the news... > > Well, I'd like to say that certain prayers of mine were certainly > answered today. I just heard the news on TV... Without wanting to > incite a controversy, let me offer my most heartfelt prayers for the > dear lady who was killed by the dog in San Francisco, and her > partner. May God bless everyone involved... > > Ava Lee > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2002 Report Share Posted March 21, 2002 This is one subject where we can certainly agree to disagree and that's fine by me :-) When I said threatened, I included that the dogs " perceived " the threat. Who knows what was going through their little doggie minds. I've never known a dog to be mean that was treated kindly all his life. I truly believe that a mean dog comes from training and/or mistreatment/abuse. Some will disagree; and that's OK. When/if my dear hubby leaves me to join our Lord, I will likely own lots of dogs to keep me company. Where we do agree, is that dogs can be unpredictable (kinda like my kids) and I would not, under any circumstances, let a strange child around my dogs unsupervised or if they felt at all uncomfortable. My dogs have a chain link kennel in the basement where they stay when we're not home and when we have company. My dogs are like my partners. Sure they can be unpredictable, but so can my husband. They can also hurt me without meaning to. So can my husband and yes, I do believe that they have traits that some would consider human. But I know some humans that could use the traits of a dog occasionally too (faithfulness, loyalty, etc.) They are too precious to me to label them simply as " animals " . They were easy train, have an understanding of discipline and are ALWAYS quick to forgive; unlike my children. Now, don't get me wrong, if I had to choose between them, my kids would end up staying of course, I'm not totally deranged :-) Responsible dog ownership is the key. No one will convince me otherwise on that. Cats, however, are a different story.... :-) Like you I never intended to start a controversy and I don't think we have. We're just a bunch of friends having a peaceful discussion and expressing our opinions and my heart truly does go out to all involved. The Lord has His reasons for allowing things like this to happen. I can only hope that something good comes out of it because it sure seems far fetched right now. I will be following this story closely, as we all will. ************************************************************************ ***************************** Tammy B baltazar@... Windows Messenger - tbscsoccer@... OT-In the news... > > Well, I'd like to say that certain prayers of mine were certainly > answered today. I just heard the news on TV... Without wanting to > incite a controversy, let me offer my most heartfelt prayers for the > dear lady who was killed by the dog in San Francisco, and her > partner. May God bless everyone involved... > > Ava Lee > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2002 Report Share Posted March 21, 2002 I've been pretty lucky for the most part and have not been attacked by anything but a man (and anyone who knows me personally will know that they are feeling more sorry for the man than me!) I have owned dogs all my life and I have always been a responsible dog owner. If these folks had've opened their eyes a little and seen that their beloved pets were dangerous to others, they may have taken steps to prevent it. It's irresponsible in the worst sense of the word, since sadly, in this case, a young lady was killed. This whole mess sickens my tummy. No one wins here: The victim is dead, her partner is widowed, the dogs are dead, the owners are going to prison. I guess the lawyers win, they got the money... ************************************************************************ ***************************** Tammy B baltazar@... Windows Messenger - tbscsoccer@... OT-In the news... Well, I'd like to say that certain prayers of mine were certainly answered today. I just heard the news on TV... Without wanting to incite a controversy, let me offer my most heartfelt prayers for the dear lady who was killed by the dog in San Francisco, and her partner. May God bless everyone involved... Ava Lee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2002 Report Share Posted March 21, 2002 I have been reading with interest the emails regarding the recent trial and verdict of the woman mauled by the dogs. I was especially interested in the exchange that Ava and Tammy just had. Just thought I'd throw in my opinion as I guess I fall somewhere in the middle about the dog issue and have some other thoughts about the trial. I have a Rottweiler - , who was my son's dog - and she is a real sweetheart. She is loving and gentle and very protective. We have a house full of cats and she has never harmed a hair on them. She has been raised to be a pet, not a guard dog, but I have no doubt that she would intervene if someone tried to harm me. She minds me very well, but Rottweilers need firm limits as I think most big dogs do. That being said, I always keep her either in the house, on a short leash or in our back yard with a six foot privacy fence that has 4x4 posts buried just under the surface of the ground parallel to the bottom of the fence so that the dogs can't dig out (and then only when we are at home and for short periods of time to get exercise and relieve herself). When we take her out, I am amazed how many parent let their little children, toddlers even, approach her without asking me if it is okay. I always tell the children to stay away and ask the parents to keep them back. I don't THINK she would hurt them, but she is away from her turf in a strange area with strange people, so I don't want to take ANY chances. I feel that is the only way to be a responsible dog owner. I see other dogs running loose and it really makes me angry. It's not being responsible or fair to the neighbors or to the pets themselves. As far as the trial goes, aside from the actual mauling, I am appalled at the behavior of the dog owners and their attorneys. They have blamed the victim for not seeking refuge in her apartment quickly enough, accused her partner of telling lies on the witness stand to bolster her civil lawsuit, and denied that they had dangerous animals even though there is proof that they were working on a deal to raise and train guard/attack dogs for members of the aryan nation. And witnesses say that the woman who owned the dogs not only did nothing to help the woman who was attacked, she didn't even call 911. So for me, the issue was not so much about the dogs, but about the owners and their behaviors. So there you go, just had to add my 7 cents worth because like the post office, the rates have increased. Sheri In Sunny Florida Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2002 Report Share Posted March 21, 2002 Oh, I am thinking of training my dogs to get my water during my first post-op weeks. They can already answer the door, but all they ever say is " go away!!! " :-) Wonder what I can get the cats to do? Sitting on my incision I guess is the most I can expect from them... ************************************************************************ ***************************** Tammy B baltazar@... Windows Messenger - tbscsoccer@... OT-In the news... > > Well, I'd like to say that certain prayers of mine were certainly > answered today. I just heard the news on TV... Without wanting to > incite a controversy, let me offer my most heartfelt prayers for the > dear lady who was killed by the dog in San Francisco, and her > partner. May God bless everyone involved... > > Ava Lee > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2002 Report Share Posted March 21, 2002 SHERI--I admire all the precautions that you (and Tammy) have taken with your pets. And I think it's very smart of you to warn kids back when they thoughtlessly run up to a strange dog--I too wish that ALL parents would teach their kids to be that careful! When I say dogs are animals, I don't say it maliciously--it's not a malicious word--it's just a statement of fact. And I don't make some breeds the 'bad guys'--I think ALL dogs can bite. It just makes sense though that a 120 presa canario can do a lot more damage--and more quickly--than can a 10-15 pound pomeranian, so more care must be taken. I LOVE animals, I think they're neat! (Especially CATS! >^..^<) However, I don't assume I know the reasons for which they do things, nor would I predict all their behaviors in all circumstances. I also think that, in the case of the trial, that the owners were not 'victims' in this situation along with the gal who died. And I don't mourn the jail time they'll spend for so recklessly and coldly disregarding someone else's life and safety. For some of the reasons you stated, they were much more culpable for what eventually happened and they SHOULD pay a heavy price. This was a real tragedy--especially for the woman and the dogs. This was, however, one of the few times anyone has been jailed for a loss of life, and negligent behavior, in regards to their animals. THAT'S what I really applaud; someone's death has finally been taken seriously. That the woman also happened to have an alternative lifestyle is also especially noteworthy... Love, Ava Lee In GastricBypass-InfoCentral@y..., " sherijacobs87 " <sjacobs3@t...> wrote: > I have been reading with interest the emails regarding the recent > trial and verdict of the woman mauled by the dogs. I was especially > interested in the exchange that Ava and Tammy just had. > > Just thought I'd throw in my opinion as I guess I fall somewhere in > the middle about the dog issue and have some other thoughts about the > trial. > > I have a Rottweiler - , who was my son's dog - and she is a > real sweetheart. She is loving and gentle and very protective. We > have a house full of cats and she has never harmed a hair on them. > She has been raised to be a pet, not a guard dog, but I have no doubt > that she would intervene if someone tried to harm me. She minds me > very well, but Rottweilers need firm limits as I think most big dogs > do. That being said, I always keep her either in the house, on a > short leash or in our back yard with a six foot privacy fence that > has 4x4 posts buried just under the surface of the ground parallel to > the bottom of the fence so that the dogs can't dig out (and then only > when we are at home and for short periods of time to get exercise and > relieve herself). When we take her out, I am amazed how many parent > let their little children, toddlers even, approach her without asking > me if it is okay. I always tell the children to stay away and ask the > parents to keep them back. I don't THINK she would hurt them, but she > is away from her turf in a strange area with strange people, so I > don't want to take ANY chances. I feel that is the only way to be a > responsible dog owner. I see other dogs running loose and it really > makes me angry. It's not being responsible or fair to the neighbors > or to the pets themselves. > > As far as the trial goes, aside from the actual mauling, I am > appalled at the behavior of the dog owners and their attorneys. They > have blamed the victim for not seeking refuge in her apartment > quickly enough, accused her partner of telling lies on the witness > stand to bolster her civil lawsuit, and denied that they had > dangerous animals even though there is proof that they were working > on a deal to raise and train guard/attack dogs for members of the > aryan nation. And witnesses say that the woman who owned the dogs not > only did nothing to help the woman who was attacked, she didn't even > call 911. So for me, the issue was not so much about the dogs, but > about the owners and their behaviors. > > So there you go, just had to add my 7 cents worth because like the > post office, the rates have increased. > > Sheri > In Sunny Florida Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2002 Report Share Posted March 21, 2002 They will purr, between making demands for more food. Thanks, http://www.vitalady.com For info on PayPal, click this link: https://secure.paypal.com/affil/pal=vitalady%40bigfoot.com OT-In the news... > > Well, I'd like to say that certain prayers of mine were certainly > answered today. I just heard the news on TV... Without wanting to > incite a controversy, let me offer my most heartfelt prayers for the > dear lady who was killed by the dog in San Francisco, and her > partner. May God bless everyone involved... > > Ava Lee > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.