Guest guest Posted May 26, 2004 Report Share Posted May 26, 2004 In a message dated 5/26/2004 5:11:39 PM Central Daylight Time, museredux@... writes: >Wait. Wait... what nations are warring? " War on Terrorism. " I can't >find it on the map... Is this a tribal thing? Yup. That keeps it pretty nebulous and allows " us " to go after " them " wherever we think " they " might be and makes " us " " justified, " doesn't it? Here's something I just read about that: " Intentions, of course, are always good. The worse the fight, the higher its justification. " Justified " violence is the worst. Unjustified violence bursts out of a bad character or bad feelings, but it doesn't go very far. But when people feel justified in the use of violence, it becomes systematic and leads to all the horrors of history. " - Lanza del Vasto (1901-1981) was a poet, Christian mystic, and nonviolent activist. Source: Fellowship Magazine, September 1975. Namasté Sam in Texas §(ô¿ô)§ There is so much good in the worst of us, and so much bad in the best of us, it doesn't behoove any of us to speak evil of the rest of us. -- Edgar Cayce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 26, 2004 Report Share Posted May 26, 2004 Wait. Wait... what nations are warring? " War on Terrorism. " I can't find it on the map... Is this a tribal thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 26, 2004 Report Share Posted May 26, 2004 You mean that " Terrorism " is not a country on your the version of the world atlas you have??!! Artemis Re: sacrifices and meaning in war > > Wait. Wait... what nations are warring? " War on Terrorism. " I can't > find it on the map... Is this a tribal thing? > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 26, 2004 Report Share Posted May 26, 2004 Required reading, Artimus. http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/cold_turkey/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2004 Report Share Posted May 27, 2004 , I don't follow your logic: " You have to believe the sacrifice has meaning, or it becomes impossible to keep going... why not give in to the Nazis if there is no rainbow to look forward to after the storm? " Sacrifice always has meaning....to the person who does it. There is no such thing as a meaningless sacrifice. And what has giving in to the Nazis to do with it? Giving in was never an option. Being devoured was. We actually do do things because they are right, not because there may be a rainbow. Self defense is also an instinct. You worry about that moment. The reasoning , thr lofty reason for the war does not make men sacrifice. They are there to stop what they see an an evil right there and personal. My point was that we make up mottos to give us a lift and we actually end up believing them. Human nature does not change, and wars we really know ,inside ourselves will never disappear. To inflate the reason for action and the people who committed them is wishful thinking. We do what we do because we must. It is the politicians who stay home comfortably and mouth lofty goals...The poor G.I. just does what he has to do.If he ends up being heroic ,that was a snap decision usually. In the end we fight to defend our country and ourselves...not to make the world safe for democracy.It is later, we look back and defend our actions about why. At the time, the soldier protects his buddies and himself from an enemy whom he hates at that moment. The World Wars were a fight to the death, not something one decides rationally to engage in and then rationally decides to get out of. War is a " clear and present danger " and the next century is not at issue. Personal survival and the survival of all we love, is. All of life can be seen as a bloody link in a bloody chain, and many do fall into despair. That in itself is not just a problem with wars. Toni sacrifices and meaning in war >>Have you ever read Tuchman? The " A Distant Mirror " subtitled " the Calamitous Century " especially ? if you have you will find the 14th Century about to collapse in on itself. Ferocious fighting (the Crusades)spiritual agony, nature rampaging,the works.<< --So when it's all over, we can look forward to a bright, glorious repeat of the FIFTEENTH century? >>Our big mistake was to think we were " fighting the war to end all wars " in 1918, " Making the world safe for democracy " in 1941... and with the beginning of the United nations, we fantasized wars will cease. Pure unadulterated hubris.<< --I'm not sure the people who fought in those wars could have kept fighting if they didn't believe in an end to war. If they had thought " this is just one bloody link in an infinite bloody chain " they'd have shot themselves. You have to believe the sacrifice has meaning, or it becomes impossible to keep going... why not give in to the Nazis if there is no rainbow to look forward to after the storm? Given what those who died had to hope for in order to prevent despair, I think the living owe it to them, to fight in little ways at least for a decent future. i managed to avoid the draft, and will probably never have to fight in a war. I'll do what I can to show appreciation for that fact, and to prevent future wars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.