Ah finally

[Guest guest]

Ohmigod!!

Thank you. I'd never heard that version.

In truth, it probably doesn't matter what I or anyone does, all that

matters is.... well, I'm not sure.

Sometimes I'm the cane-ee, other times I'm the cane-er.

Are there really 'abusive situations'?

Or is that just another story?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Haven't posted in awhile becuase I'm reading and

doing

> > the

> > > > work. But I

> > > > > > > do read all the posts and it feels like we are

headed

> > once

> > > > again into

> > > > > > > the ACIM VS. Loving What Is debate. I was

wondering,...

> > it

> > > > might not

> > > > > > > be such a huge pill to swallow if (since this

> is " loving

> > What

> > > > is "

> > > > > > > group) any or all of the deeper ACIM understandings

> could

> > be

> > > > served

> > > > > > > better without always crediting the message to ACIM?

As

> > we

> > > > all have

> > > > > > > seen, it can cause the hairs to stand up on the back

of

> > the

> > > > necks of

> > > > > > > some folks here and just creates more work, which

may

> or

> > may

> > > > not be a

> > > > > > > good thing, but what I'm getting at here is that THE

> REAL

> > > > MESSAGE GETS

> > > > > > > LOST, which may be useful, but won't be if people

> refuse

> > to

> > > > read it

> > > > > > > and/or hit delete everytime the ACIM name is

mentioned

> or

> > > > causes the

> > > > > > > whole distraction of the group. Could we go there

> without

> > > > having to

> > > > > > > forewarn others? Can't we combine it all with love

and

> > > > appreciation

> > > > > > > for the whole concept rather than distinguishing

who's

> > who?

> > > > What is,

> > > > > > > is what is, and it may be exactly what we need, but

I

> > think

> > > > some good

> > > > > > > stuff is getting caught up in the mess. I personally

> love

> > > > both. They

> > > > > > > are what is. But if we want to help each other(that

is

> > the

> > > > goal

> > > > > > > right?) can't we just serve the message without

> creating

> > a

> > > > distraction

> > > > > > > so that everyone can gleen what they want or need

> without

> > > > reservation

> > > > > > > simply because of the source??? Just curious.

> > > > > > > Love

> > > > > > > Kris

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >