Guest guest Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 Huh? No toxic mold, but " mushroom spores " ? What are mushroom spores? No toxic mold, but " some elevated levels of a type of mold spore that can case an allergic reaction, but is not considered toxic " ? No mold spores are considered toxic, only toxin producing. " A mold sniffing dog indicated there was some mold present. " Did the dog also determine what species of mold it was and what toxin it produces? (Port Angeles) -- A report on toxic mold at the Clallam County courthouse has come back negative. In a report to county commissioners, an enviromental testing company from Federal Way gave the all clear for bad mold in the basement of the building. But the report did show there were some mushroom spores in the building. It also found high levels of fiberglass fibers, dye dust associated with computer printers and high moisture in some carpeting. The company says there were some elevated levels of a type of mold spore that can case an allergic reaction, but is not considered toxic. The tests were ordered after workers in the courthouse started feeling ill with symptoms that could be related to toxic mold. A mold sniffing dog indicated there was some mold present. ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 WHERE DO I GET ME ONE OF THOSE MOLD-SNIFFING DOGS?! lol. Do they allow them to testify in court? ~Haley tigerpaw2c <tigerpaw2c@...> wrote: No toxic mold found in courthouse KONP.COM 1450 - Port Angeles,WA* June 26th, 2007 - http://www.konp.com/local/2926 (Port Angeles) -- A report on toxic mold at the Clallam County courthouse has come back negative. In a report to county commissioners, an enviromental testing company from Federal Way gave the all clear for bad mold in the basement of the building. But the report did show there were some mushroom spores in the building. It also found high levels of fiberglass fibers, dye dust associated with computer printers and high moisture in some carpeting. The company says there were some elevated levels of a type of mold spore that can case an allergic reaction, but is not considered toxic. The tests were ordered after workers in the courthouse started feeling ill with symptoms that could be related to toxic mold. A mold sniffing dog indicated there was some mold present. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 I heard from an expert in one of the most respected labs on the West Coast that they sometimes see buildings where multiple attempts at spore trap testing doesn't show anything unusual but in reality there is a serious stachybotrys problem. If the mold is inside the walls its also not difficult for the mold to be missed when they test inside the occupied space. Thats why the EPA and other organizations say that spore trap mold testing should NOT ever be used to 'show' that there isn't a problem, only when there is a problem. Stachbotrys does not sprorulate often. It is perfectly happy to sit there creating mycotoxins when there is high humidity inside the walls and not sporulate at all. It sporulates when it is drying out and about to die, not before - or after. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.