cleared of mold with the fog bombs WHAT?????

[Guest guest]

" The house will be cleared of mold next week with the fog bombs, and dirt

will be added around the outside edge of the home as backfill to prevent water

from entering the home, Ecklund said. It will then be readied for a new

family, he said. "

" West said her children have developed asthma and allergies from living in

the home. "

" Stufflebeem said a fog bomb, similar to those used to kill insects, would

be ineffective against the mold because it wouldn't reach behind drywall, and

even if it killed the mold, it's still just as dangerous dead as it is

alive. "

" Whether it's alive or dead, it's just as infective, " he said.

_http://www.pjstar.com/stories/061707/REG_BDGAQ9OJ.031.php_

(http://www.pjstar.com/stories/061707/REG_BDGAQ9OJ.031.php)

Sharon

************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 6/19/2007 5:49:42 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,

jeaninem660@... writes:

I fell sorry for whoever moves in there next.

And they wonder why there are so many lawsuits over the mold issue. Tell me

again, who is nuts!?

Sharon K

************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

[Guest guest]

I fell sorry for whoever moves in there next.

>

> " The house will be cleared of mold next week with the fog bombs,

and dirt

> will be added around the outside edge of the home as backfill to

prevent water

> from entering the home, Ecklund said. It will then be readied for a

new

> family, he said. "

>

> " West said her children have developed asthma and allergies from

living in

> the home. "

>

> " Stufflebeem said a fog bomb, similar to those used to kill

insects, would

> be ineffective against the mold because it wouldn't reach behind

drywall, and

> even if it killed the mold, it's still just as dangerous dead as it

is

> alive. "

>

> " Whether it's alive or dead, it's just as infective, " he said.

>

> _http://www.pjstar.com/stories/061707/REG_BDGAQ9OJ.031.php_

> (http://www.pjstar.com/stories/061707/REG_BDGAQ9OJ.031.php)

>

> Sharon

>

>

>

> ************************************** See what's free at

http://www.aol.com.

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

There is no law that says they can't rent it out again. No law that says

they can't rent any place with any level of mold.

If people get sick, they can sue after the fact, right? (If they can afford

a lawyer)

Nomatter how sick they are.

After all, according to all these 'experts' its harmless. Their illness must

be caused by something else. Stress...right?

[Guest guest]

it's not really about affording a lawyer, most good lawters well do

it on percentage of wins, contingency. the problem is finding a

lawyer that knows enough about mold illness to know when he has a

good case.

--- In , LiveSimply <quackadillian@...>

wrote:

>

> There is no law that says they can't rent it out again. No law that

says

> they can't rent any place with any level of mold.

>

> If people get sick, they can sue after the fact, right? (If they

can afford

> a lawyer)

>

> Nomatter how sick they are.

>

> After all, according to all these 'experts' its harmless. Their

illness must

> be caused by something else. Stress...right?

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

The difficulty probably varies from place to place but in some places, even

if the evidence someone has is

very strong, people's lives are simply not worth enough to be worth the

lawyers time

(relative to other things they feel they could be doing with that time)

They want cases that will settle quickly... They figure their time is worth

at least $300/400 hour.

Offices, staff, their education, mortgages etc. are expensive..

This means that people with mold cases have a very hard time finding lawyers

at all. Finding a *good* lawyer is even harder.

On 6/20/07, who <jeaninem660@...> wrote:

>

> it's not really about affording a lawyer, most good lawters well do

> it on percentage of wins, contingency. the problem is finding a

> lawyer that knows enough about mold illness to know when he has a

> good case.

>

> --- In <%40>,

> LiveSimply <quackadillian@...>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I have to second Live's comments - they wanna settle quick and avoid the

potentiality of being out of pocket for expert witnesses and other court

expenses - have seen it happen twice up close in the last year, once on my case

with a hospital that made a medical error on me with life-threatening

consequences and then just this last month with the atty working on the mold

case I'm close to attempted to undermine access to punitive damages - he hasn't

even been funding the science of the case so it's not like he's out of pocket on

the proof. Disgusting.

~H.

LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote:

The difficulty probably varies from place to place but in some places,

even

if the evidence someone has is

very strong, people's lives are simply not worth enough to be worth the

lawyers time

(relative to other things they feel they could be doing with that time)

They want cases that will settle quickly... They figure their time is worth

at least $300/400 hour.

Offices, staff, their education, mortgages etc. are expensive..

This means that people with mold cases have a very hard time finding lawyers

at all. Finding a *good* lawyer is even harder.

On 6/20/07, who <jeaninem660@...> wrote:

>

> it's not really about affording a lawyer, most good lawters well do

> it on percentage of wins, contingency. the problem is finding a

> lawyer that knows enough about mold illness to know when he has a

> good case.

>

> --- In <%40>,

> LiveSimply <quackadillian@...>

>

>