Guest guest Posted May 29, 1999 Report Share Posted May 29, 1999 Hi, Barb, we'll I'm pleased to find another LADA on this list (latent autoimmune diabetes in adults is what it stands for). My BG at 10 p.m. last night was 111 and I again chickened out and had a very small -- about four gulps -- of lowfat (1%) milk. Woke up at 1:20, checked BG and it was 99. Went back to sleep. Awoke at 4 a.m and couldn't go back to sleep, gave up at 5 and got up. Checked BG at 5:30 - it was 110. Fine. No breakfast, no shots, no pills. Went for walk, (both level and hills) and came back 45 minutes later. checked BG at 6:30 a.m.. It was 145! After walk! (This is very often my BG at 6:30 a.m.) I do Tai Chi with a group on Saturday morning and afterwards we go for brunch so I just had a piece of rye toast and tea to hold me til 10 a.m...real breakfast is then, which is when I'll take my lispro. Yes, you need a prescription for lispro. (But I get a prescription for NPH too, otherwise my insurance doesn't cover it). Vicki In a message dated 99-05-29 09:45:21 EDT, you write: << . And yes, I am also a type 1 1/2 and had no idea there was a name for it, LADA. What does it stand for? Well, since we're so alike, I will say that I take 13 NPH in the a.m. and 15 NPH at night. Susie, has suggested going to a longer L or UL to me too, and I'm scared, because I know what this does. Something about fear of the unknown, eh? Plus, I'd maybe have to start doing R at lunch. Haven't tried the Lispro yet. It requires a prescription, doesn't it? Keep forgetting, but it does sound a little more convenient. In any event, the regular insulin doesn't last in your body as long as some carbs, and more NPH at night would solve that. If the lowest you got at 2 a.m. was 95, I think you have plenty of room to up your NPH, which would take care of the longer staying carbs. >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 1999 Report Share Posted May 29, 1999 Susie, If my glucose is high I will get up and exercise for a few minutes and check again and it will have dropped sometimes as much as twenty points,is this not normal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 1999 Report Share Posted May 29, 1999 Vicki writes: << ... Woke up at 1:20, checked BG and it was 99. Went back to sleep. Awoke at 4 a.m and couldn't go back to sleep, gave up at 5 and got up. Checked BG at 5:30 - it was 110. Fine. No breakfast, no shots, no pills. Went for walk, (both level and hills) and came back 45 minutes later. checked BG at 6:30 a.m.. It was 145! After walk! (This is very often my BG at 6:30 a.m.) >> Some things that may be influencing that 6:30 reading ... * The " rooster effect, " whereby insulin levels rise naturally, along with other changes in your cirdadian rhythms, to prepare the body to greet the day. * Your previous night's insulin wore off. Solutions would be to switch to L or to increase the units of the nighttime injection. * If you exerted yourself pretty strenuously during the walk, your glucose levels can climb. It is your body " feeding " hard-working muscles. The glucose that was in storage is now circulating in the bloodstream, heading to places where it is needed the most. Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 1999 Report Share Posted May 29, 1999 And yes, I am also a type 1 1/2 and had no idea there was a name for it, LADA. What does it stand for? What is a type 1 1/2? I know what type 2 and type 1 are but have not come across type 1 1/2. Excuse my ignorance. Heller Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 1999 Report Share Posted May 29, 1999 My BG at 10 p.m. last night was 111 and I again chickened out and had a very small -- about four gulps -- of lowfat (1%) milk. Woke up at 1:20, checked BG and it was 99. Went back to sleep. Awoke at 4 a.m and couldn't go back to sleep, gave up at 5 and got up. Checked BG at 5:30 - it was 110. Fine. No breakfast, no shots, no pills. Went for walk, (both level and hills) and came back 45 minutes later. checked BG at 6:30 a.m.. It was 145! After walk! (This is very often my BG at 6:30 a.m.) I know this is probably not the right answer but is your meter correct? I checked this morning and my BG was 133. I checked again from the other hand and it was 113. I use the Accucheck Simplicity. I am not sure I am getting correct readings. How can there be a 20 point variation in a matter of minutes? I am considering another meter. What do you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 1999 Report Share Posted May 29, 1999 Heller writes: << ... How can there be a 20 point variation in a matter of minutes? I am considering another meter. >> We just had a long discussion of this in another diabetes group. Suggestions included checking your meter often with the calibrator, taking a blood thinner to make sure you are getting enough blood for an accurate reading (someone suggested two quick pokes, and draw some blood from each poke), and a few techniques suggested for the best way to wick the blood onto the pad. The meters have been rated for accuracy, and none of them is perfect. That is an excellent explanation for what was going on with Vicki. Blood thinners are also helpful in preventing heart attacks and strokes. I learned that piece of news too late. I'll try to remember to hunt up those posts and post here. Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 1999 Report Share Posted May 29, 1999 writes: << If my glucose is high I will get up and exercise for a few minutes and check again and it will have dropped sometimes as much as twenty points,is this not normal. >> Yes that is normal, . Some diabetics have, however, reported that when they exercise very strenuously, their glucose can actually increase. Because what we measure is the glucose circulating in the bloodstream. And that level can increase as the glucose comes out of storage and heads for muscles that are overworked from exercise, to replenish them. A similar event occurs when some type 2's begin low-carbing. Their body is not producing as much cholesterol because their insulin levels drop, so cholesterol that has been held in storage comes out to make up the difference, and it can be reflected as elevated cholesterol, because the blood tests measure what is in the bloodstream, not in storage. Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 1999 Report Share Posted May 29, 1999 In a message dated 99-05-29 11:51:19 EDT, you write: << If you exerted yourself pretty strenuously during the walk, your glucose levels can climb. It is your body " feeding " hard-working muscles. The glucose that was in storage is now circulating in the bloodstream, heading to places where it is needed the most. >> No, I wouldn't say strenuously...very SMALL short hill(s)...more of a " rise, " really. I didn't even break a sweat. V. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 1999 Report Share Posted May 29, 1999 , LADA stands for " latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, " otherwise known as " type 1-1/2 " , Yesterday I sent a post that quoted some information about it. Unfortunately I don't save my posts but if anyone else saved it, perhaps they could post it again. If necessary I'll retype it. (Wish I had a scanner!) Vicki Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 1999 Report Share Posted May 29, 1999 In a message dated 99-05-29 12:24:21 EDT, you write: << know this is probably not the right answer but is your meter correct? I checked this morning and my BG was 133. I checked again from the other hand and it was 113. I use the Accucheck Simplicity. I am not sure I am getting correct readings. How can there be a 20 point variation in a matter of minutes? I am considering another meter. What do you think? >> I use a LifeScan Sure Step meter. I was warned not to do two readings in a row (unless I hypo'ed and had to take glucose tab and recheck in 15 minutes), that they would inevitably be different. I was also told there's a 16% margin for error, which would probably account for the difference. Vicki Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 1999 Report Share Posted May 29, 1999 Vicki said: << From: WHIMSY2@... Oops, message got sent before I could type the quote about LADA so here it is: " LADA (latent autoimmune diabetes in adults) is a form of autoimmune diabetes that starts in adulthood instead of childhood. It is nothing more than type 1 diabetes starting slowly after the age of 30-35. In general LADAs are not overweight, have no family history of NIDDM, may or may not have family history of IDDM, do not put on weight at the time of diagnosis -- as a matter of fact, some of them may even lose weight at that time -- and they tend to have higher BGs from the beginning....15-20% of all diabetic adults may have LADA nad LADA may constitute as much as 50% of the non-obese adult onset diabetes. This form of diabetes is sometimes known as 'type 1-1/2' " . This fits me to a T. So I'm not a 1 or 2 but a little of both - type 1-1/2. Anyone else on this list LADA? >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 1999 Report Share Posted May 29, 1999 I'm not sure if I fall into that group, but I think so. No history in my family, not overweight. I was 23 when I got it and now I'm 31. The DR. figured stress and trauma had a lot to do with it. Anyone else have that experience? OtterCritter wrote: > > > > Vicki said: > > << From: WHIMSY2@... > > Oops, message got sent before I could type the quote about LADA so here it > is: > > " LADA (latent autoimmune diabetes in adults) is a form of autoimmune > diabetes > that starts in adulthood instead of childhood. It is nothing more than type > 1 > diabetes starting slowly after the age of 30-35. In general LADAs are not > overweight, have no family history of NIDDM, may or may not have family > history of IDDM, do not put on weight at the time of diagnosis -- as a > matter > of fact, some of them may even lose weight at that time -- and they tend to > have higher BGs from the beginning....15-20% of all diabetic adults may have > LADA nad LADA may constitute as much as 50% of the non-obese adult onset > diabetes. This form of diabetes is sometimes known as 'type 1-1/2' " . > > This fits me to a T. So I'm not a 1 or 2 but a little of both - type 1-1/2. > Anyone else on this list LADA? >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ONElist: where real people with real interests get connected. > http://www.onelist.com > Join a new list today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 Please remove me from your list Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 By a blood thinner, do you mean the daily aspirin or some other form? I included an aspirin in my routine and I have a much easier time extracting blood now. I used to have a hard time with it but the diabetic nurse gave me some hints and they are very helpful. With the Accucheck Simplicity, I found that the reading is lower when I saturate the pad. My diabetic nurse does not like the machine I am using and gave me another one that uses less blood. It is the Accucheck Advantage but I have about 50 sticks left and do not want to waste them. (cheapo me!) I figure that I will move to the new machine next month. I will let you know if it is more user friendly. Heller OtterCritter wrote: > > > > Heller writes: > > << ... How can there be a 20 point variation in a matter of minutes? I am > considering another meter. >> > > We just had a long discussion of this in another diabetes group. Suggestions > included checking your meter often with the calibrator, taking a blood > thinner to make sure you are getting enough blood for an accurate reading > (someone suggested two quick pokes, and draw some blood from each poke), and > a few techniques suggested for the best way to wick the blood onto the pad. > The meters have been rated for accuracy, and none of them is perfect. That > is an excellent explanation for what was going on with Vicki. > > Blood thinners are also helpful in preventing heart attacks and strokes. I > learned that piece of news too late. I'll try to remember to hunt up those > posts and post here. > > Susie > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ONElist: where the world talks! > http://www.onelist.com > Join a new list today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 Thanks for the information. When I was first diagnosed with diabetes, I was in the dentist office and there was a young couple with a baby. She was called in first and the husband and I started talking about her. He told me that she had Crone's disease and as a result of the medication, she had developed diabetes. She was young, thin and no history of diabetes in the family. I am sure she would be considered a Type 1 1/2. I remember thinking to myself " What a bummer! " because at the time I was still in shock myself. Now, I am really doing well and feel sooooo much better. On one of my other lists, a very nice lady sent out a low carb cookbook. It imports into Mastercook and is a Word file. I have it saved as a text file and can send it to anyone. I have not thorougly gone through it but there are 806 recipes. I tried to print it out and it is 325 pages!!! If you want it, please let me know and I will forward it to you. It is really something. Please write me privately and I will send it. Heller OtterCritter wrote: > > > > Vicki said: > > << From: WHIMSY2@... > > Oops, message got sent before I could type the quote about LADA so here it > is: > > " LADA (latent autoimmune diabetes in adults) is a form of autoimmune > diabetes > that starts in adulthood instead of childhood. It is nothing more than type > 1 > diabetes starting slowly after the age of 30-35. In general LADAs are not > overweight, have no family history of NIDDM, may or may not have family > history of IDDM, do not put on weight at the time of diagnosis -- as a > matter > of fact, some of them may even lose weight at that time -- and they tend to > have higher BGs from the beginning....15-20% of all diabetic adults may have > LADA nad LADA may constitute as much as 50% of the non-obese adult onset > diabetes. This form of diabetes is sometimes known as 'type 1-1/2' " . > > This fits me to a T. So I'm not a 1 or 2 but a little of both - type 1-1/2. > Anyone else on this list LADA? >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ONElist: where real people with real interests get connected. > http://www.onelist.com > Join a new list today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 Stress and trauma! Wow, that is really a shame. It is amazing what stress can do to our bodies. Thank you for explaining the difference between type 1 1/2 and type 2. It all makes sense now. Heller Harms wrote: > > > > I'm not sure if I fall into that group, but I think so. No history in my > family, not overweight. I was 23 when I got it and now I'm 31. The DR. > figured stress and trauma had a lot to do with it. Anyone else have that > experience? > > OtterCritter wrote: > > > > > > > > Vicki said: > > > > << From: WHIMSY2@... > > > > Oops, message got sent before I could type the quote about LADA so here it > > is: > > > > " LADA (latent autoimmune diabetes in adults) is a form of autoimmune > > diabetes > > that starts in adulthood instead of childhood. It is nothing more than type > > 1 > > diabetes starting slowly after the age of 30-35. In general LADAs are not > > overweight, have no family history of NIDDM, may or may not have family > > history of IDDM, do not put on weight at the time of diagnosis -- as a > > matter > > of fact, some of them may even lose weight at that time -- and they tend to > > have higher BGs from the beginning....15-20% of all diabetic adults may have > > LADA nad LADA may constitute as much as 50% of the non-obese adult onset > > diabetes. This form of diabetes is sometimes known as 'type 1-1/2' " . > > > > This fits me to a T. So I'm not a 1 or 2 but a little of both - type 1-1/2. > > Anyone else on this list LADA? >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ONElist: where real people with real interests get connected. > > http://www.onelist.com > > Join a new list today! > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Having difficulty getting " in synch " with list members? > http://www.onelist.com > Try ONElist's Shared Calendar to organize events, meetings and more! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 Vicky. The rise in your BG after walking is probably due to a beginning lack of basic/background insulin, as you did not take that in the morning. By the way, you wirte of no pills also?????? I thought you stopped pills - and only had insulin now???????? That makes quite a difference. Oluf PS. Also a few months ago, I think we agreed on the basic definitions and origin of your DM by which you are a Type-2, insulin dependant. Your type of diabetes is NOT an autoimmune proces like in Type-1 (+/- LADA). -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: WHIMSY2@... Til: diabetes_intonelist <diabetes_intonelist> Dato: 29. maj 1999 17:43 Emne: Re: nighttime insulin >From: WHIMSY2@... > >Hi, Barb, we'll I'm pleased to find another LADA on this list (latent >autoimmune diabetes in adults is what it stands for). > >My BG at 10 p.m. last night was 111 and I again chickened out and had a very >small -- about four gulps -- of lowfat (1%) milk. Woke up at 1:20, checked BG >and it was 99. Went back to sleep. Awoke at 4 a.m and couldn't go back to >sleep, gave up at 5 and got up. Checked BG at 5:30 - it was 110. Fine. No >breakfast, no shots, no pills. Went for walk, (both level and hills) and >came back 45 minutes later. checked BG at 6:30 a.m.. It was 145! After walk! >(This is very often my BG at 6:30 a.m.) > >I do Tai Chi with a group on Saturday morning and afterwards we go for brunch >so I just had a piece of rye toast and tea to hold me til 10 a.m...real >breakfast is then, which is when I'll take my lispro. > >Yes, you need a prescription for lispro. (But I get a prescription for NPH >too, otherwise my insurance doesn't cover it). Vicki > >In a message dated 99-05-29 09:45:21 EDT, you write: > ><< . And yes, I am also a type 1 1/2 and had no > idea there was a name for it, LADA. What does it stand for? > > Well, since we're so alike, I will say that I take 13 NPH in the a.m. >and > 15 NPH at night. Susie, has suggested going to a longer L or UL to me too, > and I'm scared, because I know what this does. Something about fear of the > unknown, eh? Plus, I'd maybe have to start doing R at lunch. Haven't > tried the Lispro yet. It requires a prescription, doesn't it? Keep > forgetting, but it does sound a little more convenient. In any event, the > regular insulin doesn't last in your body as long as some carbs, and more > NPH at night would solve that. If the lowest you got at 2 a.m. was 95, I > think you have plenty of room to up your NPH, which would take care of the > longer staying carbs. >> > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >ONElist: the best source for group communications. >http://www.onelist.com >Join a new list today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 - it isn't! If you were a DM type-2, treated with diat, excercise and oral meds, now on insulin alone or as supplement, doesn't make you a type 1,5 nor a LADA. You are type-2 still. Your type is of another origin than type-1 (+/- LADA), please see my post on LADA. Oluf -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Heller Til: diabetes_intonelist <diabetes_intonelist> Dato: 29. maj 1999 18:20 Emne: Re: nighttime insulin > > >And yes, I am also a type 1 1/2 and had no >idea there was a name for it, LADA. What does it stand for? > >What is a type 1 1/2? I know what type 2 and type 1 are but have not >come across type 1 1/2. Excuse my ignorance. > > Heller > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Give back to your community through " Grow to Give. " >http://www.ONElist.com >See homepage for details. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 Metervariations are normal, and your's would probably be OK. Next time you go to the doc for a check-up, bring your meter. When he checks your BG make a BG-ckeck from the same sample, as he does, on your own meter to compair. If the results are within acceptable range of the meters, you are OK. Oluf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 Heller writes: << By a blood thinner, do you mean the daily aspirin or some other form? I included an aspirin in my routine and I have a much easier time extracting blood now. >> Yes, aspirin is what I had in mind (although there are others). As little as a 1/4 dose (81 mg eneric-coated pills) can be helpful in thinning the blood and helping decrease heart attack risk for type 2 diabetics, who are prone to having sticky blood platelets. Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 Thanks, Yes I know that I am type 2. I saw the post and it was very informative. OLUF JOHNSSON wrote: > > From: Metaforum-sson@... (OLUF JOHNSSON) > > - it isn't! > If you were a DM type-2, treated with diat, excercise and oral meds, now on insulin alone or as supplement, doesn't make you a type 1,5 nor a LADA. You are type-2 still. Your type is of another origin than type-1 (+/- LADA), please see my post on LADA. > Oluf > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: Heller > Til: diabetes_intonelist <diabetes_intonelist> > Dato: 29. maj 1999 18:20 > Emne: Re: nighttime insulin > > > > > > >And yes, I am also a type 1 1/2 and had no > >idea there was a name for it, LADA. What does it stand for? > > > >What is a type 1 1/2? I know what type 2 and type 1 are but have not > >come across type 1 1/2. Excuse my ignorance. > > > > Heller > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >Give back to your community through " Grow to Give. " > >http://www.ONElist.com > >See homepage for details. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Looking to expand your world? > http://www.onelist.com > ONElist has over 150,000 e-mail communities from which to chose! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 My PCP suggested a baby aspirin a day! Toni OtterCritter wrote: > > > Heller writes: > > << ... How can there be a 20 point variation in a matter of minutes? I am > considering another meter. >> > > We just had a long discussion of this in another diabetes group. Suggestions > included checking your meter often with the calibrator, taking a blood > thinner to make sure you are getting enough blood for an accurate reading > (someone suggested two quick pokes, and draw some blood from each poke), and > a few techniques suggested for the best way to wick the blood onto the pad. > The meters have been rated for accuracy, and none of them is perfect. That > is an excellent explanation for what was going on with Vicki. > > Blood thinners are also helpful in preventing heart attacks and strokes. I > learned that piece of news too late. I'll try to remember to hunt up those > posts and post here. > > Susie > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ONElist: where the world talks! > http://www.onelist.com > Join a new list today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 Barb and Vicky. Why do you consider changing from NPH to L or UL? - if you are Ok, maybe with a little adjustments as it is now? L or UL works much longer, this may be easier in some ways, but bring drawbacks in others, if you are so anxious about hypos. Its the more complicated to treat a hypo the longer-acting insulin you use! What do your docs say? Oluf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 Mine was diagnosed after a mild bout of flu. Vicki << The DR. figured stress and trauma had a lot to do with it. Anyone else have that experience? >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 1999 Report Share Posted May 30, 1999 I stopped taking my sulfonurea completely. And I cut back by 500 mg. on the Glucophage but I'm still taking 2000 units of that, 1000 morning and 1000 evening. My insulin needs went up dramatically after cutting out my lunchtime dose of Glucophage so I decided as long as my insurance covers it, I'll keep on taking it. In a message dated 99-05-30 08:23:54 EDT, you write: << By the way, you wirte of no pills also?????? I thought you stopped pills - and only had insulin now???????? That makes quite a difference. Oluf Sorry I didn't keep that post. I do remember discussion but don't remember your answer. But the definition I posted of LADA does fit me to a T and remember, my doc said I had a " smoldering type I " which I think was his way of saying type 1-1/2 (but I'll ask him when I see him next). Further, wouldn't the fact that I have two other autoimmune disorders - hypothyroidism and Sjogren's -- indicate a propensity for autoimmune disease? Vicki PS. Also a few months ago, I think we agreed on the basic definitions and origin of your DM by which you are a Type-2, insulin dependant. Your type of diabetes is NOT an autoimmune proces like in Type-1 (+/- LADA). >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.