Guest guest Posted September 13, 2004 Report Share Posted September 13, 2004 > I hope AS never becomes a flimsy defense for anyone. Me too. I agree with you that it can certainly contribute to crime. I don't agree with Jerry that it is never a good defense. However... In the case of the treason (assuming for a moment the man is guilty - it hasn't been proven yet - and also assuming AS will be used, for his lawyer would be a fool to not try *every single possible* way to get his client off the hook), the soldier knew that he was not to tell others of any classified information he had. He signed statements, had a security clearance, etc - and plenty of time to say " uh, I don't think I could keep quiet if someone asked me something. " He also had the chance to realize he screwed up and go to his commanders and say, " I screwed up, I gave out some classified information. " (in fact that is encouraged because even worse then a release of classified information is a release no one knows about) He had plenty of chances to unscrew himself - but failed to avail himself of them, even when he had time to think about his actions. > Seems like if Darius had gotten sensible handling, he wouldn't have > had to feel like he couldn't stop stealing trains. Others have said, > " give him a job where he can drive trains " > > Or move him to where it's not so easy to " steal trains " . Quite possibly. But he did know it was wrong, and stealing a train is hardly something you do on impulse - it has to be planned for it to succeed. Heck, I suspect Darius would tell us of his planning. Fact of the matter is, too, he *did* endanger those people on that train. Personally, I want to know my train driver went to the morning meeting where he heard about a signal malfunction, temporary speed restriction, or whatever else or whatever else. He did it - not the courts, not anyone else. The first time he was found guilty of a transit-related crime, he pretty much ensured he'll never be employed by any transit organization ever. You don't employ a bank robber at a bank, even though he may know what the banks' security weaknesses are, maybe even better then anyone else. That's something he did to himself, not something anyone did to him. Sure, it would have been great if someone helped him get a job *before* he did that, but no one did and he is still responsible for his actions (although hardly a terrorist as he is being charged). While I have some sympathy for him, I also think *he* could have moved himself, cleaned up his act and got a job, or a bunch of other things. Just as I don't let people get away with saying " Well, if she had understanding from others she wouldn't have killed her kid " , I don't let autistics get away with blaming an indirect cause. I do agree that there are times where autism might cause someone to not have the criminal intent necessary to find them guilty, and I know autistics are often mistreated by the justice system. But autistic criminals don't change that. -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2004 Report Share Posted September 13, 2004 Before my now 22 yr. old son was dx'ed as high functioning autistic, I got a call that he had a ride in a police car... Something he told me later, and he really was kind of excitd about that part, hard to say as his mood was a bit hard to read then, he was 12. He'd taken supplies from a construction site. Right under their noses. When they got back from lunch, he'd damned up the river near the site with all sorts of concrete and various materials, and seemed oblivious to their calls when they yelled so they were 'forced' to call police. He told me it was hot and he made a very cool wading spot. Of course I had to explain to police who totally believed me that he had some challenges...I didn't yet have a dx for him...Its a small town...They were understanding. The construction crew had to disamble the dam. They were outraged! I guess we played the autism card to get him out of that one. BTW I suspect my 13 yr. old is stealing traffic cones. uh-oh Kim ________________________________________________________________ Get your name as your email address. Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2004 Report Share Posted September 14, 2004 Kim wrote: >I guess we played the autism card to get him out of that one. BTW I >suspect my 13 yr. old is stealing traffic cones. uh-oh No, I'm sure they're following him home. ;-) Jane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2004 Report Share Posted September 14, 2004 > >I guess we played the autism card to get him out of that one. BTW I > >suspect my 13 yr. old is stealing traffic cones. uh-oh > > No, I'm sure they're following him home. > > ;-) > > Jane The more I think about this, I feel a need to clarify my feelings. I don't want AS used as a " free pass. " But AS can be a factor in how a person winds up in trouble. I think AS is usefull information to a court once it decides how to treat anyone who is guilty of a crime. We have to be accountable but AS can mean accepting a different type of accountability; prison vs. treatment for example. As for Darius, the train-taker; he is a repeat offender. I am really saddened by how this case has gone on for years. He certainly doesn't need jail time but he sure needs better help than in the past and I know many who have tried. Jerry Newport Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.