Guest guest Posted November 28, 2005 Report Share Posted November 28, 2005 I'm a little late forwarding this . . . I still have one unwanted gift after the holiday - a cold! Rogene --- Lana Transue <lanadearest@...> wrote: > From: " Lana Transue " <lanadearest@...> > saxony01@... > Subject: My thanksgiving gift. > Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:49:08 -0800 > > Between the two e-bay ads I ran this week end I had > 480 readers, not much, > but better than " zero " . Beth had quite a few hundred > readers on her ads too, > I believe. Each and every person knew exactly what > they were looking at when > opening these ads. People want to know, they want > pictures, they want the > truth. But sometimes the truth is hard to swollow > when it means you can't > get what you what. > > Find a way to have your voice heard. It is the only > way we are going to get > the research studies that we need to have done! > > Women who have silicone gel implants need to have an > x-ray that will show > where the silicone is migrating too. The FDA > excepting anything less is, the > MRI, outragoues to say the least. We have a right to > know. > > In the leagal portion where women opted out of the > class action lawsuit, > women only had the ability to sue for LOCAL > INJURIES. They were able to sue > for that because the silicone does cause problems, > if the silicone was > there, you could be compensated. Since they claim > that the silicone doesn't > cause diseases and doesn't go beyond the implant > site, you can't get > compensated for any other injuries cause by the > silicone. Isn't it > convientient that the MRI's don't show the migrated > silicone and how, oh > how, will your children ever prove local injuries if > the x-rays don't show > the silicone in their bodies? Why would they be > compensated for their > injuries when the women themselves aren't? Now, if > and x-ray showed the > migrated silicone in thier bodies and or the > placenta tests showed that the > silicone had indeed gotten to the children, then you > have a whole new ball > game! > > Women with silicone gel and saline filled implants > also have a right to know > if we are hypersensitive to silicone after getting > and implant, so do other > people with different types of implants! > > Because the manufactures admitt that the harm to > children, caused by > secondary exposure, is enconclusive, we have a > right to request that > chemical anaylisis studies be done on the placentas > of implanted women who > give birth during the studies. Even more > importantly, any children who are > born to women with implants should have a chemical > and a lymphocyte > evaluation of their placentas. How hard could a > study like this be? The > placentas are expelled at birth and easy to examine. > My oldest son's > placenta was glued together, all in one piece! The > doctor said , " It's like > silly putty. " I wish I would have known to have that > placenta tested. > > Without the right studies, we will never have the > answers. > > Does anyone have a copy of the testimony given by > Talcott at the FDA > hearing wherein the FDA pulled the gel filled > implants off the market for > saftey studies? > > Lana > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2005 Report Share Posted November 28, 2005 --- Lana Transue <lanadearest@...> wrote: > From: " Lana Transue " <lanadearest@...> > saxony01@... > Subject: My thanksgiving gift. > Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:49:08 -0800 > > Between the two e-bay ads I ran this week end I had > 480 readers, not much, > but better than " zero " . Beth had quite a few hundred > readers on her ads too, > I believe. Each and every person knew exactly what > they were looking at when > opening these ads. People want to know, they want > pictures, they want the > truth. But sometimes the truth is hard to swollow > when it means you can't > get what you what. > > Find a way to have your voice heard. It is the only > way we are going to get > the research studies that we need to have done! > > Women who have silicone gel implants need to have an > x-ray that will show > where the silicone is migrating too. The FDA > excepting anything less is, the > MRI, outragoues to say the least. We have a right to > know. > > In the leagal portion where women opted out of the > class action lawsuit, > women only had the ability to sue for LOCAL > INJURIES. They were able to sue > for that because the silicone does cause problems, > if the silicone was > there, you could be compensated. Since they claim > that the silicone doesn't > cause diseases and doesn't go beyond the implant > site, you can't get > compensated for any other injuries cause by the > silicone. Isn't it > convientient that the MRI's don't show the migrated > silicone and how, oh > how, will your children ever prove local injuries if > the x-rays don't show > the silicone in their bodies? Why would they be > compensated for their > injuries when the women themselves aren't? Now, if > and x-ray showed the > migrated silicone in thier bodies and or the > placenta tests showed that the > silicone had indeed gotten to the children, then you > have a whole new ball > game! > > Women with silicone gel and saline filled implants > also have a right to know > if we are hypersensitive to silicone after getting > and implant, so do other > people with different types of implants! > > Because the manufactures admitt that the harm to > children, caused by > secondary exposure, is enconclusive, we have a > right to request that > chemical anaylisis studies be done on the placentas > of implanted women who > give birth during the studies. Even more > importantly, any children who are > born to women with implants should have a chemical > and a lymphocyte > evaluation of their placentas. How hard could a > study like this be? The > placentas are expelled at birth and easy to examine. > My oldest son's > placenta was glued together, all in one piece! The > doctor said , " It's like > silly putty. " I wish I would have known to have that > placenta tested. > > Without the right studies, we will never have the > answers. > > Does anyone have a copy of the testimony given by > Talcott at the FDA > hearing wherein the FDA pulled the gel filled > implants off the market for > saftey studies? > > Lana > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.