Guest guest Posted December 20, 2005 Report Share Posted December 20, 2005 --- Zuckerman <dz@...> wrote: > From: " Zuckerman " <dz@...> > <ifriends@...> > Subject: Fw: new study on breast cancer patients > with implants > Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:50:15 -0500 > > Dear Friends, > > A newly published study finds a high rate of > complications within 2 years of mastectomy patients > getting reconstruction with breast implants. As I > point out in the AP story and our press release > (below), the study is funded by Dow and > underestimates complications by studying women for a > short period of time and by not using MRIs to test > for rupture and leakage. If they had done so, the > rates would have been even higher. > > This is yet another reason why we are concerned > about the FDA returning silicone breast implants to > the market. > > > Zuckerman, Ph.D. > President > National Research Center for Women & Families > 1701 K Street, NW, Suite 700 > Washington, DC 20006 > (202) 223-4000 > www.center4research.org > > Remember us when you donate to United Way or CFC -- > we're # 9884 > > Associated Press > > December 19, 2005 > > Implants, Mastectomies Linked to Problems > > By LINDSEY TANNER > > > > CHICAGO (AP) - Breast implants in women who have > undergone mastectomies often result in complications > that require more surgery, a study in Denmark found. > > > > > Over a period of up to four years, about one-third > developed at least one potentially serious > complication, including thick, tight scarring and > infections, the researchers reported. Implant > ruptures were rare, with only five reported among > the 574 Danish women studied. > > > > Overall, about 20 percent of the women studied > required surgery to treat the problems, according to > the study by Danish Cancer Society researchers and > scientists at the International Epidemiology > Institute in Rockville, Md. > > > > One surgeon said in an accompanying editorial that > the numbers are " alarmingly high and arguably > unacceptable. " > > > > The study appears in the December issue of Archives > of Surgery. It was paid for by the institute, which > receives funding from the Dow Corning Corp., a > former maker of silicone breast implants. > > > > Zuckerman, president of the National Research > Center for Women and Families, said the complication > rate for implants in mastectomy patients is actually > much higher than the study suggests. > > > > Most participants got implants several weeks after > breast removal surgery, whereas most U.S. mastectomy > patients who choose implants get them when their > breasts are removed, Zuckerman said. That method, > involving a single round of surgery, is often easier > psychologically because women wake up from their > mastectomies with refashioned breasts, but it is > also more stressful on the body, she said. > > > > Also, she said the participants in the study did not > undergo MRI scans, which are the best way to detect > ruptures. > > > > " This study is really missing the boat, " said > Zuckerman, whose group has opposed efforts to return > silicone implants to the market. > > > > All of the women studied got implants, most of them > made of silicone. > > > > Silicone implants have been restricted in the United > States for over a decade because of fears that > ruptures and leakage might damage women's health. > But some mastectomy patients have continued to > receive them. > > > > The American Cancer Society estimates more than > 200,000 U.S. women will be diagnosed with breast > cancer this year. At least half will have > mastectomies, and Zuckerman said about two-thirds of > those patients choose some type of reconstructive > surgery. > > > > Many have breasts fashioned from excess flesh from > their abdomens -- a method that is less likely than > implants to result in thick scars and generally > requires fewer " revisional " operations, said Dr. > Navin Singh, a s Hopkins University surgeon and > author of the accompanying editorial. > > > > Singh said mastectomy patients are more prone to > complications than healthy women seeking implants > for purely cosmetic reasons, because much of their > breast tissue and surrounding skin are removed > during cancer surgery, giving doctors less to work > with. > > > > Also, some mastectomy patients may undergo radiation > and chemotherapy, which can increase the risk of > implant complications, he said. > > > > Meredith Cobb, a hot line counselor for the > Chicago-based breast cancer advocacy group Y-ME, > said her silicone implants are not symmetrical and > she needs more surgery to fix them. Still, the > Colorado Springs, Colo., woman, who was diagnosed > with breast cancer in 2003 at 26, said her implants > have helped her " feel whole again. " > > > > " I wouldn't give them up now, " she said. " A lot of > people might not go through another surgery, but > it's something that I'm willing to do, " Cobb said. > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > PR Newswire > > December 19, 2005 > > Statement of Dr. Zuckerman, Ph.D. President, > National Research Center for Women & Families > > > > WASHINGTON, Dec. 19 /PRNewswire/ -- Dr. > Zuckerman, Ph.D. issued the following statement > regarding today's release of the article > " Reconstructive Breast Implantation After Mastectomy > for Breast Cancer " in the journal Archives of > Surgery (December 2005): > > > > " The study published today by researchers from the > International Epidemiology Institute, and funded by > Dow Corning, provides important information about > the high complication rate for silicone gel breast > implants used for reconstruction after breast > cancer. However, the complication rate found in this > study is less than half as high as those reported in > other studies, because there are serious > shortcomings in the study design. > > > > " The study reported that 21% of the women needed > additional surgery, 31% developed at least one > serious complication, and 16% developed at least 2 > serious complications. Those statistics are very > worrisome, given that these women had breast > implants for anywhere from 7 weeks to 4 years, with > an average of only 23 months. A slightly longer-term > study of Inamed silicone implants presented by FDA > scientists in 2003 found that 46% of reconstruction > patients needed additional surgery within the first > 2-3 years. That's more than twice as high as the > rate reported in the study released today. Previous > research has shown that new complications occur > every year, with complications requiring additional > surgery tending to increase over time. > > > > " The authors of this study conclude that > 'reconstruction failure (loss of implant) is rare,' > which is not surprising given the short period of > time that the patients had their implants. However, > the failure rate is probably considerably higher > than reported. This new study did not use Magnetic > Resonance Imaging (MRIs) to detect rupture, and did > not mention that MRIs are the primary way to > accurately detect implant rupture or leakage for > silicone gel breast implants. By failing to use > MRIs, the authors are undercounting the number of > ruptures. This also would help explain the lower > rate of additional surgery. If a woman underwent a > MRI and then found out her implants were ruptured, > she would probably have surgery to remove them (to > avoid silicone leaking into her lymph nodes or other > parts of her body). > > > > " At the April 2005 FDA advisory panel meeting, a > study in which women were given MRIs in the first > and third year after implantation found that 20% of > the reconstruction patients had ruptured implants by > the third year. Almost none of those ruptures were > detected without the MRIs. Many of the women had > their implants removed when they learned they were > ruptured. > > > > " Overall, the study shows that, even when > complications are minimized because of shortcomings > in the study design, many breast cancer patients > will have complications and need additional surgery > after undergoing breast reconstruction with silicone > gel breast implants. " > > > > The National Research Center for Women & Families > (NRC) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit research and > education organization that works to improve > policies and programs that affect the health and > safety of women, children, and families. > http://www.center4research.org/ > > > > Zuckerman, Ph.D, has post-doctoral training in > epidemiology from Yale Medical School. Prior to her > current position, she was a faculty member at Vassar > and Yale, a researcher at Harvard, a Congressional > staffer in the U.S. House of Representatives and > U.S. Senate, and a senior policy advisor in the > White House at the Office of Science and Technology > Policy. > > > > National Research Center for Women & Families > > > > Web site: http://www.center4research.org/ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.