Guest guest Posted June 5, 2000 Report Share Posted June 5, 2000 IF MR. BEN COHEN PROFITS FROM THE ACTIVITIES OF BEN AND JERRYS HOME MADE THEN A BOYCOTT OF THE PRODUCTS PRODUCED BY BEN AND JERRYS HOME MADE IS BOTH JUST AND APPROPRIATE. IF HE WERE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH BEN AND JERRY'S HOME MADE THEN HIS OPINION WOULD BE LESS INFLUENTIAL AND IMPORTANT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2000 Report Share Posted June 6, 2000 >IF MR. BEN COHEN PROFITS FROM THE ACTIVITIES OF BEN AND JERRYS HOME MADE THEN A BOYCOTT OF THE PRODUCTS PRODUCED BY BEN AND JERRYS HOME MADE IS BOTH JUST AND APPROPRIATE.< I would disagree... If he made it clear it was a personal decision.. nothing to do with the company.. He has a right to a personal opinion, right or wrong. It's my understanding when he was part of the group asking for a new trial, he stated that the new trial might even find the subject guilty... He just felt a new trial was in order. He has a right to that opinion. You have a right to boycott his product. Weintraut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2000 Report Share Posted June 6, 2000 Ok, this is where I have to weigh in....If Ben Cohen were an ordinary employee of Ben & Jerry's, just some guy who worked in the plant, I would agree, but he's not. He's the co-founder, his name and face are on the packaging. Just like if I say something, it's a personal opinion, but if the Chief of Police says something, the office he holds automatically associates him as speaking for the dept. Also, I would not put a lot of stock in what Ben & Jerry's says to deny this. They have a lot to lose. Kim -----Original Message----- > >That's right, just like this forum and most of us involved. Our opinions >are ours, not that of who we work for. > >>IF MR. BEN COHEN PROFITS FROM THE ACTIVITIES OF BEN AND JERRYS HOME MADE >THEN >A BOYCOTT OF THE PRODUCTS PRODUCED BY BEN AND JERRYS HOME MADE IS BOTH JUST >AND APPROPRIATE.< > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2000 Report Share Posted June 7, 2000 Hey people. Correct me if I'm wrong. This guy's not an employee. He's an owner. That's why his endorsement for this cause is important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2000 Report Share Posted June 7, 2000 I'm with you 100% Kim. Seems like some our colleagues are missing the point. Dan McMullen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2000 Report Share Posted June 7, 2000 we may be crossing e-mails but ben and jerrys is sold - ben is a nobody, etc i respect everyone's opinion that have posted to the thread and thank you for the variety of thoughts. I just have a hard time messing with someone's life if i don't know the WHOLE truth. I wasn't asking folks to forgive B & J, just to research it and disregard past rumor. IF you do the research and decide to boycott - i respect that! thannks all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2000 Report Share Posted June 7, 2000 --- Kim Kinsey wrote: > Ok, this is where I have to weigh in....If Ben Cohen > were an ordinary > employee of Ben & Jerry's, just some guy who worked > in the plant, I would > agree, but he's not. He's the co-founder, his name > and face are on the > packaging. Just like if I say something, it's a > personal opinion, but if > the Chief of Police says something, the office he > holds automatically > associates him as speaking for the dept. ---------<snip>---------- Let me dash through here with a quick (and possibly silly) alternate view: I'm the webmistress of the Break Room. (Yah, one tiny bit of electronic nonsense, no big corporation selling anything, but let's follow me down this path for a bit...) I sign a petition in a mall. Maybe my views on abortion, or homosexual couples desiring certain " rights " , " are unpopular to others. Maybe even - goodness! - diametrically opposed to some of y'all on this list! The Public Information Act(s) allow someone, some member of the media or even just a regular Joe/Jane, to see the names on those petitions. Oh NO! Olmstead thinks differently! Has an opinion different than mine! Even signed A PETITION asking for something I think is WRONG!!! AAAUUUUGGGHHHH! Let's boycott her website! Let's delete her e-mail without reading it! Horrors! Let's even send e-mail around the world about it! Maybe we can get more and more people to trash her " product! " Certainly NEVER surf to " http://www.gryeyes.com " ever again! That'll show her and maybe she'll see the error of HER ways! Okay, here's another " hot " button.... she thinks something related to our actual employment, something to do with cops, maybe even a jury's or a judge's decision in a capital case was wrong and she signs a petition along with other misguided people, asking for a review. Now, does she splash this all over her website, her " product? " Hmmmm. Don't see that anywhere. Hmmmmmm. She does appear to be a proponent of recycling, she's obviously committed to animal welfare and rescuing homeless companion-animals and she may even be in favor of saving the rain-forests, but we're not sure about that. We ARE sure she signed this petition though.... she's even admitted it. Obviously, everything she's ever been associated with is trash now. Y'all better examine your own beliefs and be very careful about signing petitions, 'cause if you ever get famous, somebody will wave a copy of said petition and ruin your otherwise good name. Doesn't matter what good works you've done, you'll be branded by that signature on an unpopular petition. You and your prosperous business, too. Which, by the way, hasn't been prostituted into advertising for the particular issue currently at odds with others. (Just them rain-forests and all.. but only other corporations who slash & burn rainforests hate THAT!) But your company will be just as bad as YOU are for having scribbled your name on one of the many lines on a petition somewhere, requesting a review of something somebody - maybe even a whole lot of somebodies - thinks is awful. And a bunch of other people - the ones with the more Right viewpoint, of course - think THAT petition is simply horrific. You should obviously pay for that. Remember, what you say at work reflects on your department. We've seen - even on this list - how what you say off-duty, in e-mail, can be used by SOME folks as " proof " that you're representing your department's view when you post something. Many of us have disclaimers (my usual signature line is on my other PC in that e-mail program over there....dagnabbit!) to disassociate us from our agencies' " views " so we think we can express our own opinions, safely. HA! I've been victim of that fallacy; some of y'all may have been similarly affected by one or another of your posts. ....okay, so it wasn't a quick dash, after all... Revel in your personal opinions. Try to think them through, if you can; examine all the facts that caused you to believe that way (on any subject). If you still hold to them, more power to ya. It IS a democracy here in the United States. <grin> ===== Happy to be here, proud to serve. Olmstead http://www.gryeyes.com __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2000 Report Share Posted June 7, 2000 Lord, it's gonna kill me to boycott Newman, but hey......principal is principal. And I hope Sarandon gets really stinky seats at the Rangers games next year. Lyn magik@... Re: 911:: Ben & Jerrys cop killer TRUTH .. IF you do the research and decide to > boycott - i respect that! > > thanks all > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.