Guest guest Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 At risk of being political, there will be no consumer health-oriented FDA until the government changes. The FDA is now nothing more than a corporate arm. > Thanks Ilena, > > > > > EXCERPT: According to Zuckerman, president of > > the National Research Center for Women and Families, > > von Eschenbach " is talking about getting drugs to > > terminally ill patients faster, and that's a > > laudable goal. But you can't approve a drug and > > assume it will only be used for terminally ill > > patients. Everything he has been quoted as saying > > suggests he doesn't understand how FDA works " (Los > > Angeles Times, 9/27). > > > http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=32778 > > > > > > > > Email this story to a friend. > > Print this story. > > View entire Policy Report. > > > > > > Daily Health Policy Report > > > > Administration News | No Timetable To Nominate > > New FDA Commissioner, HHS Secretary Leavitt Says > > [sep 27, 2005] > > HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt on Monday > > said that " there is no timetable " for the nomination > > of a permanent FDA commissioner after Lester > > Crawford resigned on Friday, CQ HealthBeat reports > > (CQ HealthBeat, 9/27). Crawford resigned two months > > after his confirmation as FDA commissioner in July. > > In an e-mail to FDA employees, Crawford wrote that > > " after three and a half years as deputy > > commissioner, acting commissioner and, finally, as > > commissioner, it is time, at the age of 67, to step > > aside. " In a letter to President Bush on Friday, > > Crawford said that his resignation was " effective > > immediately. " Crawford, a veterinarian and a food > > safety expert, became FDA deputy commissioner in > > 2002 and later became acting agency commissioner. > > Bush named von Eschenbach, director of the > > National Cancer Institute, as acting FDA > > commissioner (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, > > 9/26). Von Eschenbach on Monday in an e-mail to > > cancer research advocates called his appointment " an > > interim role " and said that he will " work to ensure > > an orderly transition of a new, permanent > > commissioner at the FDA " (Alonso-Zaldivar, Los > > Angeles Times, 9/27). However, CQ HealthBeat reports > > that " von Eschenbach may be running the agency on an > > acting basis for a considerable time. " According to > > an unnamed Washington, D.C., consultant, " The > > candidate pool has weakened considerably, " and an > > " abortion litmus test " has eliminated some " strong " > > candidates who support abortion rights (CQ > > HealthBeat, 9/26). Von Eschenbach said that he will > > continue to serve as NCI director during his tenure > > as acting FDA commissioner, adding that he hopes to > > " closely integrate the discovery aspects of > > biomedical research " with the FDA approval process > > to provide patients with " the full benefits of > > molecular medicine " > > > > Ability To Head Two Agencies Questioned > > In a letter to White House Chief of Staff > > Card on Friday, Senate Finance Committee > > Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) wrote that Bush should > > not name von Eschenbach as acting FDA commissioner > > because an individual who heads both FDA and NCI > > will not have the ability to " dedicate 100% of his > > or her time and talent to the nation's public health > > and safety agency. " Grassley said, " It's not > > possible to give the FDA the kind of strong > > leadership that is needed to reinvigorate the agency > > on a part-time basis " (Pear, New York Times, 9/27). > > New England Journal of Medicine Editor in Chief > > Drazen said, " These are agencies with big > > budgets that make a lot of decisions that influence > > the health of individual Americans. What we really > > need are two highly qualified, motivated individual > > leaders " (Los Angeles Times, 9/27). However, > > Tauzin, president and CEO of the Pharmaceutical > > Research and Manufacturers of America, said that the > > leadership of von Eschenbach and the " expertise of > > dedicated veteran FDA regulators will allow the > > agency to continue its important work until a new > > commissioner is nominated and confirmed " (Higgins, > > Washington Times, 9/27). In a research note, > > Prudential Securities analyst Diane Duston said that > > von Eschenbach could face difficulties as head of > > both FDA and NCI, adding that the Bush > > administration might have to name an acting NCI > > director (Heavey, Reuters News, 9/26). > > > > Conflict-of-Interest Concerns > > Some critics questioned whether von Eschenbach > > has a conflict of interest as the head of both FDA > > and NCI. Curt Furberg, a professor at Wake Forest > > University and an FDA adviser, said, " It is very > > hard for him to be in both positions and deal with > > requests regarding cancer drugs. I really see a > > potential conflict. As head of NCI, he may be very > > eager to get drugs approved by FDA, particularly > > drugs that have been developed and tested by NCI " > > (Los Angeles Times, 9/27). Citigroup health care > > analyst Heldman said that von Eschenbach > > " appears to be industry friendly, particularly in > > the oncology area, " adding that von Eschenbach > > " transformed [NCI] from a research center to one > > that generates cancer treatments and strategies for > > prevention " (CQ HealthBeat, 9/26). According to > > Zuckerman, president of the National Research > > Center for Women and Families, von Eschenbach " is > > talking about getting drugs to terminally ill > > patients faster, and that's a laudable goal. But you > > can't approve a drug and assume it will only be used > > for terminally ill patients. Everything he has been > > quoted as saying suggests he doesn't understand how > > FDA works " (Los Angeles Times, 9/27). > > son, executive director of the Center for > > Science in the Public Interest, said, " The FDA does > > not need someone who will choose speed over safety, > > or else we'll have a lot more Vioxx " cases > > (Washington Times, 9/27). > > > > Editorials > > Several newspapers recently published > > editorials that addressed the resignation of > > Crawford and the appointment of von Eschenbach as > > acting FDA commissioner. Summaries appear below. > > > > > > > > a.. Long Island Newsday: The " troubled FDA > > needs a permanent, full-time commissioner who will > > ensure that decisions about the safety and > > effectiveness of drugs ... will be based on credible > > science, uncolored by political agendas, " according > > to a Newsday editorial. The editorial states, > > " Re-establishing its tarnished credibility has to be > > among the agency's top priorities now, " as FDA " is > > too important to let reasonable doubts about its > > objectivity and capabilities continue to fester " > > (Long Island Newsday, 9/27). > > > > > > b.. New York Times: The " stopgap solution " > > to the " surprise resignation " of Crawford -- the > > appointment of von Eschenbach, the NCI director, as > > acting FDA commissioner -- " can only weaken both > > agencies, " a New York Times editorial states. > > According to the editorial, FDA, " with regulatory > > jurisdiction over huge swaths of the economy, surely > > needs a full-time steward, " as the " interim > > appointment could stretch out for some time. " In > > addition, von Eschenbach " emphasizes ... a stance > > that could lead to looser regulation, " although > > " FDA's recent problems suggest a need to monitor > > drugs more closely, " the editorial concludes (New > > York Times, 9/27). > > > > > > c.. Wall Street Journal: The " problem " with > > FDA " has been largely one of inattention and failure > > to modernize, not reckless drug approvals or cozy > > relationships with Big Pharma, " according to a > > Journal editorial. The appointment of von Eschenbach > > as acting FDA commissioner is an " encouraging sign > > that the administration may finally be taking the > > FDA seriously " because he " understands that the > > FDA's job isn't merely to police the pharmaceutical > > companies but also to speed good therapies to > > patients, " the editorial states (Wall Street > > Journal, 9/27). > > > > Broadcast Coverage > > WAMU's " The Diane Rehm Show, " an > > NPR-syndicated program, on Tuesday in the first hour > > is scheduled to include a discussion of the future > > of FDA after the Crawford resignation. Guests on the > > program are scheduled to include Calfee, > > resident scholar at the American Enterprise > > Institute; Kessler, former FDA commissioner; > > Rovner, NPR health policy correspondent; and > > Wood, former assistant commissioner of the > > Office of Women's Health at FDA (Rehm, " The Diane > > Rehm Show, " WAMU, 9/27). > > > > The complete segment will be available online > > in RealPlayer and Windows Media after the broadcast. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.