Guest guest Posted September 14, 2005 Report Share Posted September 14, 2005 http://www.statesmanjournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2005508260337 Flame retardants lingering in humans Study finds higher levels of chemical in human breast milk BETH CASPER Statesman Journal August 26, 2005 Like most people, Wykhuis of Portland carries PCBs in her body. An industrial chemical banned in 1977, polychlorinated biphenyls or PCBs accumulate in fish and other animals eaten by people. The toxins persist for decades in the environment, and most people carry low levels in their bodies. However, a study of mothers' breast milk, including a sample from Wykhuis, shows that flame retardants are starting to surpass levels of PCBs in human fatty tissue. " Have we created a new PCB problem for ourselves? " asked -Derry, the research director for the Seattle-based Northwest Environment Watch. " We have dug this hole for ourselves. It's like DDT; we find out it harms birds, and we pull it off the market. With PCBs, we find it causes health problems, and we pull it off the market. We have to learn the lesson. " The study was released Thursday by the Northwest Environment Watch and the Environmental Protection Agency's Department of Toxic Substances Control. It showed that 13 of 40 mothers tested had higher levels of flame retardants than PCBs in their breast milk. -Derry said flame retardants might pose similar health threats to those of PCBs, which have been linked to developmental delays and cancer. Studies such as this one have raised concerns about toxins in everyday products. Flame retardants are used in electronic products and foam cushions. State Rep. Vicki Berger, R-Salem, sponsored successful legislation this past session that banned two types of flame retardants. A third type, deca, was not included in the ban, although the state is required to review deca in the future. " We banned two of them outright, but the industry was pretty much there anyway, " she said. " We would have been the first (state) in the nation had we banned the third one. The problem is that the science on the third one is not conclusive. " Drawson of Albemarle Corp., which manufactures flame retardants, said industry responded appropriately when information about some flame retardants emerged. He also said the deca type saves lives. One study showed that 190 lives are saved every year in the United States from the use of deca in television sets. " Deca is still in use and is a major flame retardant, " he said. " It makes a significant contribution to the reduction of fire. Deca itself has a low risk factor. It is not a product that we would describe as being toxic. " Even so, Wykhuis, 33, said she tries to make better choices to reduce the dangerous chemicals in her body. " It's continually just kind of a weird feeling that you are walking around with all sorts of chemicals in your body that you didn't intentionally put there, " she said. " It makes me want better options and choices on how we can prevent these chemicals from being so prevalent. " bcasper@... or (503) 589-6994 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.