Guest guest Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/23/politics/23cnd-fda.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- September 23, 2005 Embattled Commissioner of F.D.A. Resigns By MARIA NEWMAN Lester M. Crawford resigned as the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration this afternoon, telling his staff that at 67, he is ready to retire. Dr. Crawford has been in the post only since July, yet his tenure was marked by several controversies, including delays on the approval of over-the-counter sales of the morning-after pill and questions about whether the F.D.A. had acted quickly enough to inform consumers about dangers involving popular medicines like the pain pill Vioxx and antidepressants like Zoloft. The Associated Press said his resignation was effective immediately. Health and Human Services Secretary O. Leavitt accepted Crawford's resignation " with sadness, " a spokeswoman for the department, Pearson, told The A.P. " We thank him for his service and wish him well. " Asked if he was forced to resign, Ms. Pearson declined further comment, calling the matter a personnel issue. Three weeks ago, the director of the F.D.A.'s office of women's health resigned to protest the agency's decision days before to further delay approval of over-the-counter sales of the morning- after pill. Dr. F. Wood, who is an assistant F.D.A. commissioner, said in an e-mail message to staff members that she could no longer serve at the agency " when scientific and clinical evidence, fully evaluated and recommended for approval by the professional staff here, has been overruled. " Critics of the pill, including some conservative groups, contend that its easier availability would encourage young girls to engage in risky sexual behavior. Proponents of the pill, including many women's groups, say that its wider availability would reduce unwanted pregnancies and abortions. In announcing the decision to delay approval, Dr. Crawford said that the F.D.A. had decided that the scientific research supported giving over-the-counter access of the drug to women 17 and older, but that the agency could not figure out how to do that from regulatory and practical standpoints without younger teenagers' obtaining the pills, too. The decision infuriated many Democrats and abortion rights advocates, who said the agency had allowed politics to trump science. In an interview with The New York Times, Dr. Wood said she " doesn't find persuasive " the explanations offered by Dr. Crawford to justify the agency's decision. Dr. Crawford, a veterinarian who specialized in food safety, was nominated in February and not confirmed for months because of disputes among lawmakers over the morning-after pill and an investigation into accusations that he was having an affair with a colleague. During his consideration for the top post, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Patty Murray of Washington threatened to keep the nomination from the floor unless Dr. Crawford prompted his agency to make a long-delayed decision on whether the so-called morning-after pill may be sold over the counter. An inquiry into reports of the affair found some inconsistencies between his and the woman's explanations of some of their interactions, but investigators found no evidence of an affair, and no senator wanted to pursue the issue further. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ www.BreastImplantAwareness.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.