Guest guest Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/071097/fea_implant.BAK1 In the fight of their lives Sisters of Silicone battle medical establishment By Tom Corwin Staff Writer It started almost the moment they entered her body. Martha Cosnahan received silicone breast implants after both her breasts were removed due to fibrous tumors in 1975. She hoped the implants would restore her shape and self-image. Instead, she claims they tortured her for nearly 10 years and leaked silicone that is ruining her health. Mrs. Cosnahan is one of 400,000 women whose lives are in limbo as she awaits the painfully slow negotiations of a federal bankruptcy judge and the heated battles of attorneys over compensation for breast implant patients by Dow-Corning and other implant manufacturers. But doctors such as plastic surgeon Randy say the women's claims and the lawsuits fly in the face of his experience and medical studies that showed no link between silicone and diseases like lupus that Mrs. Cosnahan and others claim afflict them. THE BREAST IMPLANT controversy first boiled over in 1992 when the Food and Drug Administration banned their use for cosmetic surgery. Today the battle over implants is being fought on two fronts: In the legal realm, Mrs. Cosnahan and others await a settlement that once totaled more than $4 billion but now is in doubt because of Dow-Corning's bankruptcy. Others, like a 52-year-old local educator who asked that her name not be used, have opted to go ahead with their trials and will fight it out with the companies in federal court in Savannah within the year. In the medical realm, massive reviews of medical records by researchers at Mayo Clinic and Harvard University found no significant link between silicone and connective tissue diseases. But the women claim those studies were influenced by funding from the breast-implant companies. They point to two more recent studies, one by Tulane University and the other by a pathologist at the University of Tennessee-Memphis, that show a link between disease and silicone. For the 75 or so local women who make up the support group Sisters of Silicone, the medical debate is personal because they claim no doctor in Augusta will believe their stories, and they are forced to travel to Columbia, and Memphis to find someone to treat them. They can look forward to few highlights outside their group, such as the recent Lifetime cable channel movie Two Voices that chronicled the battles of Sybil Goldrich and Kathleen Anneken against illnesses they blamed on their implants. So intense is this controversy, however, that Lifetime felt compelled to air a short newscast after the show featuring doctors debunking the link between silicone and the women's autoimmune disease. Still, ``it's really an upper for us because we've been suppressing for so long,'' Mrs. Cosnahan said. has disbanded for summer. Ms. Cosnahan, 58, said her doctor told her to give it a rest. The heat and bright sun of the summer also affects the women more because of their conditions.} ABOUT SIX MONTHS after her implants were first put in, Mrs. Cosnahan felt tremendous pain that spread to her joints and throughout her body. The breast implants were removed and a second pair put in. But these turned hard within months. ``My breasts were as hard as this doorknob,'' she said, reaching up from her kitchen chair to grab the pantry doorknob. Her small Maltese dogs, Honey Bunny and Cleopatra, barely stir on her lap. What followed was months and years of constant fever and fatigue, intense pain in her joints and a rash across her face. The implants were finally removed in 1984. It wasn't until 1992, when she was watching a breast implant victim talk about her symptoms, that the light bulb went off in her head. ``Everything she said, (every symptom) was a `me too,''' Mrs. Cosnahan said. She joined the women who later became a massive class action suit against the manufacturers. It was the largest class-action suit in legal history, and such an immense threat that Dow-Corning declared bankruptcy. The chance for a decent settlement is now dwindling - the most Mrs. Cosnahan can get for her disease according to the terms of the new settlement agreement is about $250,000. To qualify for the maximum amount, which is unspecified in the papers, the patient has to either be dead or suffering from severe kidney failure, she said. HER FRIEND the educator is also sick. The woman who once ran five miles a day can barely carry out her school duties, is often winded, and requires as much as 12 hours of sleep at a time. Though she got her implants to enhance her appearance, she and Mrs. Cosnahan say the women don't let that divide them. They realize there is strength in their union, even if they feel isolated from the rest of the world at times. ``We are the new lepers,'' the woman said. ``These things sat like toxic waste dumps in our chests.'' Dr. Shanklin, the pathologist who treats the women in Memphis, has found silicone derivative in nearly every one of his patients' organs, the women said. And that explains how it can cause disease, they claim. As the silicone entered the body from the ruptured or leaky implants, through the packaging} the body tried to rid itself of the silicone by sending it to its traditional means of excretion - to the liver, the lungs, the kidneys, and eventually the brain. There, though other scientists claim that silicone is inert and the body does not react to it, the body's defense systems attacked, fighting it for so long that the defense systems began attacking the body itself, causing what are known as autoimmune diseases. A RECENT STUDY in Tulane identified a marker in the blood that is associated with these diseases and found a higher incidence of this marker in women with silicone breast implants. Against that, Dr. can stack up 10 major studies that showed no relationship between having the breast implants and developing disease later on. ``In the main, doctors and plastic surgeons and others pretty much agree there is no cause and effect relationship between silicone breast implants and arthritis'' and related diseases, Dr. said. In fact, in his travels to Poland to perform reconstructive surgery for children who otherwise couldn't get it, he's talked to European colleagues who can and do recommend the gel implants. He also points out that a federal judge in Washington state hired an outside expert to review the scientific data in a breast implant case and came to the same conclusion about the anti-silicone studies. ``He called all that total junk science and he would not allow them to be experts in federal court,'' Dr. said. In his own experience putting in hundreds of the gel implants, there were a few cases where there were ruptures, but the silicone did not leak outside the capsule of scar tissue that forms around it, Dr. said. ``The (surrounding) breast tissue is absolutely normal,'' he said. He now uses saline implants and prefers to do breasts reconstructions from flaps of skin, fat and muscle taken either from the back or the stomach. Doctors don't dismiss the women's suffering, he added. ``I can sympathize with them, but all I can go on is what science says,'' Dr. said. FOR BOTH SIDES, that battle will continue. The local educator will begin her part of the legal battle - she opted out of the settlement and will have her lawsuit heard in federal court in Savannah. Once offered $1.4 million to settle, the last offer was about $50,000, which she said would not even cover a year's worth of medical bills. And while they are not nearly as visible as they once were, the women insist they have not disappeared and will not back down to the doctors or lawyers. ``We're living in limbo,'' Ms. Cosnahan said. ``But we're still here. We're going to be here. And we're still going to be sick.'' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.