Guest guest Posted July 13, 2010 Report Share Posted July 13, 2010 Hello, about two years ago, being stuck in a CBT, I made contact with ACT. It helped me very much to cope with a depression and severe procrastination habits, allowing me to take part in life again, to finish my study and to get a job. At my current workplace, lots of situations arise which are accompanied by suffering of me and my fellow workers. I don't want to go into any details now; it might suffice to say that I'm not the only one who is seriously considering quitting the job. What I'm constantly asking myself now is if quitting the job equates to avoidance or not. According to my own understanding of ACT, it doesn't promote needless suffering, but supports people in accepting pain that inevitably comes with living. I find it very difficult though to decide what suffering is needless or inevitable in this case. The outcome of quitting is unknown beforehand. In retrospect, one might say that suffering was needless, if the new job fits one expectations and character better. If suffering remains the same or gets even worse, it could seem inevitable. But even then, there could exist a better fitting job somewhere else. The one extreme - quitting one job after another in the hope to find a better one - certainly looks like avoidance to me. The other extreme - not even looking for anything else - somehow doesn't look like valued and directed living to me. But where is the middle line? Please, could you tell me if you've ever been in a similar situation yourself and what has helped you to come to a decision? Did it help you to become more clear about your values, for example? Thanks for reading Marco Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.