Guest guest Posted February 19, 2007 Report Share Posted February 19, 2007 Yes Swamis at large indeed. Remember, it is a very different ball game when you have had your uterus removed and are doing the high dose WP, at least as far as the estradiol part is concerned. Its just not going to build up a lining and you really do not need to have all that dangerous high P that Wiley is promoting either. So who knows what Somers is exactly doing? From the 20/20 show we can see we are dealing with a couple of relentless promoters. Too bad they are spoiling it for so many of us who have discovered what a difference BHRT makes for us. Who cares if we look like Somers or are "ageless", PLEASE we are all going to die and so is Somers, "blooming lips" and all. Madeleen lynnelalala@... wrote: Somers got that wild-ass speculation from Wiley. The studies show the opposite: that women who took birth control pills have not gotten more breast cancer. If I hear one more fake fact from those two hormone Swamis, I'll lose my bridgework. L. In a message dated 2/19/2007 2:46:54 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, indiana127sbcglobal (DOT) net writes: As for Suzanne Somers and her uterine problems/hysterectomy, she states in Ageless that she thinks the problems stemmed from decades of oral contraceptive use, especially in the early days when birth control pills had much higher levels of hormones. Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.