Reply on the Chemical list & responses

[Guest guest]

--- Kathynye@... wrote:

> From: Kathynye@...

> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:08:35 EDT

> Subject: POST: Re: Reply on the Chemical list &

> responses

> Kathynye@...

>

> Subj: Bristol Meyer Squibb-Surgitek chemical list:

> introduced into

> U.S.Dist.

> Date: 6/15/2005 2:16:02 AM Eastern Standard Time

> From: SWEETCAROLINELV@...

> Kathynye@...

>

> I WAS THE ONE WHO'S LAWYERS DID THIS IN MINN CT WITH

> JUDGE DOTY AND BOTH

> DOW CORNING AND BRYSTOL MEYERS HAD TO PUT A CERTAIN

> NUMBER OF IMPLANTS

> IN HIS COURT AND ALSO GIVE HIM A LIST OF CHEMICALS

> ----THE LIST YOUR

> SHOWING SEEMS TO BE THE " DOW CORNING LIST " ---IF

> YOU LOOK AT THE " Q-7

> " AND " Q " NUMBER CODES THOSE WERE DOW CORNING -AND

> THE NAMES OF THE IMPLANTS

> AT THE END --- SILASTIC AND ECT ----THOSE WERE DOW

> CORNING ---DOW ALSO USED

> CHLORAPLATINIC ACID AND PLATINUM IN CODE -- I AM

> SURE THE COURT RECORDS WERE NOT

> ALL THERE ---- IT SHOWS THAT DOW DID THE LIST AND

> THE IMPLANTS INTO THE COURT

> BUT BRYSTOL MEYERS ASKED FOR A CONTINUANCE SEVERAL

> TIMES ALSO AND THEY WERE

> NOT AS FORTHCOMMING WITH THEIR LIST OF INGREDIENTS

> ---THEIR IMPLANTS WERE

> " SURGITEK " AT THE TIME

> AND IT WAS MY SURGERY IN 89 -----if you could look

> up the types of

> implants ---silastic 1 and the others I am sure you

> will see they are

> dow corning and that list has been mistakenly

> labeled as BRYSTOL LIST OF

> INGREDIANTS ---its dow corning ----- I can call my

> ex lawyers and ask

> them ---- I wonder if they are still in the minn

> courts ---??? luv

> caroline

>

======================================================

> Subj: Reply on the Chemical list

> Date: 6/15/2005 11:25:43 PM Eastern Standard Time

> From: bjezra@...

>

> Caroline & Kathy

>

> You will have to ask Pam Dowd where she got the

> information…. if you look at

> the top it was posted by her.

>

>

>

> http://yukonmom47.tripod.com/id5.html

>

> I found all the information on Tony’s and or her

> website

>

======================================================

> Subj: Re: Reply on the Chemical list

> Date: 6/16/2005 10:38:36 AM Eastern Standard Time

> From: SWEETCAROLINELV@...

>

>

> I KNOW where it came from ---ME ---- back when they

> asked for the list

> my lawyers put in the MN. court ---its the pages of

> info that went with

> the whole ISSUE ---there were " motions " and "

> delays " and several

> confusing judicial rulings --I had huge boxes of my

> records and by the

> time I read all the originals the info had already

> been POSTED AS

> BRYSTOL MEYERS --- I have the originals and the

> proof that the list WAS

> DOW CORNINGS LIST -----THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO

> MADE THE TYPE OF

> IMPLANTS IN THE LISTING --THE DIFFERENT " SILASTIC "

> IMPLANTS ----LOOK AT

> THE DOW DISCLOSURE STATEMENT THAT SHOWS THE IMPLANTS

> DOW WILL PAY CLAIMS

> FOR -----THE SILASTIC IS THE " DOW " NAME --ALSO THE

> WAY DOW CODED THEIR

> INGREDIENTS WAS WITH THE Q7 AND ECT , SAME CODE

> NUMBERS AS DOW ALWAYS

> USED BACK THEN AND CALLED THEIR " TRADE SECRET "

> RECEIPE BUT BY DEMANDING

> THE COMPANY PRODUCT ORDER LIST THEY FOUND THE

> PLATINUM --- I HAVE HAD

> MOST OF MY RECORDS FROM EARLY LAWYERS AND HAPPENINGS

> IN STORAGE ----as I

> have moved 5 times since I got that info -------I am

> just trying to

> " CORRECT " THE INFO -----THAT IS FROM MY RECORDS AND

> LAWYERS

> ------CAROLINE

>

>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> -------------------------------------

> Subj: Response to Sally Kirkland and Britney

> Breast Implant comments

> Date: 6/15/2005 3:47:25 PM Eastern Standard Time

> From: ilena03@...

> lgrove@...

>

>

> Hello Lloyd Grove:

>

> As head of an international support group for women

> affected by their breast

> implants, I share Sally Kirkland's concerns about

> breastfeeding with implants!

>

>

> A quick Googling of " Britney " and " breast implants "

> augments Ms Kirkland's

> belief about Britney's potential 'enhancements.'

>

> Ms Spears would certainly not be the first celeb to

> deny surgical

> intervention, and clearly the photos on just these

> few sites reveal an amazing assortment

> of breast sizes for her.

>

> http://www.ebaumsworld.com/brits.html

>

>

http://www.liquidgeneration.com/poptoons/britneys_breasts.asp

>

>

http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/archives/000251.html

>

> http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Britney.html

>

>

> After decades of true science virtually ignoring the

> issue of safety and

> breastfeeding with implants, recent studies are

> revealing alarming platinum levels

> in implanted women and their offspring.

>

> In working with thousands of women with implant

> problems for 10 years, none

> are more despondent than those whose children share

> their ill effects. And what

> pediatrician dares ask a woman whose child has

> severe allergies or autoimmune

> symptoms if Mom has implants? Virtually none!

>

> Ilena Rosenthal

> Director, Humantics Foundation

> www.BreastImplantAwareness.org

> www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Shari.htm

> One mother's experience

>

> lgrove@ edit.nydailynews.com

> =======================================

> Subj: Re: POST:Responses & article & Sally

> Kirkland on Britney & Breast

> Implants

> Date: 6/15/2005 12:03:24 AM Eastern Standard Time

> From: hecate1@...

> Kathynye@..., devans@...,

> samnh@...,

> ilena03@...

> Sent from the Internet (Details)

>

>

>

> Women

>

> Police are joking about us. The men police

> speculate about who has breast

> implants and who does not. Police are no different

> than other men and so it is

> my guess that other men also talk and laugh if they

> think someone has them.

> Woman are ridiculed by men about a lot of things.

> Especially now that we are

> in a war economy. NOW more than ever before it is

> necessary for women to have

> health and mental clarity.

>

> There is another issue that we should all think

> about. It is not a sin to

> want to look normal. It is a courtesy to other

> people to look normal. It is a

> courtesy to ourselves to look normal. No one who got

> their implants for

> cosmetic reasons should feel or be made to feel

> guilty.

>

> No one who gets big boobs should feel guilty or be

> made to feel guilty.

> These women are only following our sick society.

> Remember back in the old

> fashioned days when women laced themselves into

> tight corsets that caused all sorts

> of physical problems ? Remember the Chinese women

> who bound their feet ?

> Little six year olds where made to suffer untold

> agonies for the sake of " Golden

> Lilys " for CENTURIES. In Muslim countries Egypt and

> others. Little girls are

> castrated . Their clitoris is removed without

> anesthesia and their vaginas are

> swone (sp) shut. Why? So they cannot have sexual

> feelings and their eventual

> husbands will not have to worry about their

> faithfulness. Women have been

> mutilated all thru history right up to today.

> Society has been beating on women

> since we changed from goddess worshiping city states

> to a vengeful God in the

> sky. Earth changes were responsible for the change

> in our society that was

> harmful to women.

>

> Women will win eventually . There is no doubt of

> that. The tobacco

> companies lost and so will the drug companies. It

> took close to one hundred years

> for woman to get the vote. We will win

>

> one woman at a time.

>

> Suz

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>