Guest guest Posted January 17, 2012 Report Share Posted January 17, 2012 Here is the latest from Dr. Mercola on the cell phone use radiation HORROR in the making. I've previously forwarded his articles re. the connection between cell phone use and brain cancer (GBT). This article goes much further. I've warned every visiting nurse and personal aide about this, to no avail. ly, I'll probably give up warning folks. Bruce Chesley Truth is a terrible cross to bear. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered. - Paine The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws - Tacitus " The cure for cancer is in your grocery store. " Why Are Cell Phones Using the Wrong Safety Standards? The process used to certify cell phones is based on a one-size-fits-all model that leaves many typical cell phone users, especially children, vulnerable to excessive and dangerous radiation exposure. http://emf.mercola.com/sites/emf/archive/2012/01/17/cell-phones-using-the -wrong-safety-standards.aspx?e_cid=20120117_DNL_art_2 ____________________________________________________________ 57 Year Old Mom Looks 25 Mom Reveals $5 Wrinkle Trick That Has Angered Doctors! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4f15a5ee1f609c23cm03vuc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2012 Report Share Posted January 18, 2012 Hi Bruce and All. > I've warned every visiting nurse > and personal aide about this, to no avail. ly, I'll probably > give up warning folks. There's a very simple way to sum up cellular and indeed MOST modern 'wireless' tech gear: 1. It operates in the microwave (radio) range. 2. This is the same exact range as radar, at lower power. 3. Microwave ovens cook with these same radio waves (AKA radar). (Trivia question: What was the name of the FIRST microwave oven ?) Therefore via simple associative thinking: When one places a microwave transceiver next to a hunk of meat (a head ?) there is some (at least small...) amount of 'cooking' taking place. The same simple reasoning can be applied to the much more fearsome presences of ionizing (nuclear) radiation, which is far more powerful and penetrating - and nobody wants to hear or talk about that either. (And contrary to popular misconceptions radio & radiation are very different energies.) When one is simply afraid to understand one's own world (apparently ?) it is much 'safer' to retreat into a pretend, 'safe' world of one's own making ? Many, many harmful things are so 'normal' and constantly present in our so-called 'modern' lives; and folks seem to prefer NOT to be attentive to the parts of their very own lives ?!?! An experiment to try, if you wish: Approach an average teenage boy - someone with his entire adult life looming before him, and ask him=> " Where does the water you drink come from ? " . When he states the obvious...'from the faucet' ask him from where before that...'the pipes', perhaps ? But where before that, does it ultimately come from ? Most likely this boy will end the exchange abruptly with an admonishment to go away and leave him alone (and some expletives ?). The point in asking: For anyone with a growing body and decades of living ahead what could possibly be MORE important than knowing his drinking water comes from a clean/pure & trustworthy place ?! More likely however would be that it is the same water he's always drank and so he just trusts it, free of thought and/or concern. There=> that sums many things (like cellular phones...) up very neatly; the wee bit that says 'free of thought and/or concern.'. Best Wishes to All ! mark PS: Trivia question answer: The FIRST microwave oven was the Amana Radar Range, discovered by Raytheon - who 'discovered' microwave cooking quite by accident via radar misconfigurations... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.