Guest guest Posted June 4, 2005 Report Share Posted June 4, 2005 Very interesting results from this study ... what is causing infections months after the initial surgery? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dopt=Abstract & list_uids=15820599 & query_hl=1 Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005 Apr;50(2):134-7. Epub 2004 Dec 18. Related Articles, Links [surgical site infection surveillance in breast implants surgery][Article in French]Malavaud S, Reme C, Gangloff D, Roques C, Chavoin JP.Unite operationnelle d'hygiene, laboratoire de bacteriologie-hygiene, hopital de Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse, 1, avenue Jean-Poulhes, TSA 50032, 31059 Toulouse cedex 09, France. bernard.malavaud@...The results of long-term follow-up of surgical site infection (SSI) after aesthetical breast surgery are reported. 205 consecutive patients operated from 1/2000 to 3/2002 were followed for at least one year. Postoperative incidents were observed in 26 (12.7%) patients, including SSI in six (2.9%) patients. After surgery, the mean time to SSI was 113 days, with only two cases in the first postoperative month. In all SSI cases, no antibiotic prophylaxis had been given. The causative role of infectious agents in breast implant capsule occurrence is under investigation.PMID: 15820599 [PubMed - in process] __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2005 Report Share Posted June 4, 2005 I suspect that non-sterile operating rooms are partly the fault. . . .It would be interesting to know how many of these implant surgeries were done in the plastic surgeon's surgical suite? Dr. Blais knew, from examining Shari's capsules, that her plastic surgeon's surgical suite had a dropped ceiling! Rogene --- Tricia Trish <glory2glory1401@...> wrote: > > Very interesting results from this study ... what is > causing infections months after the initial surgery? > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dopt=Abstra\ ct & list_uids=15820599 & query_hl=1 > > Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005 Apr;50(2):134-7. Epub > 2004 Dec 18.Related Articles, Links > > > > [surgical site infection surveillance in breast > implants surgery] > > [Article in French] > > Malavaud S, Reme C, Gangloff D, Roques C, Chavoin > JP. > > Unite operationnelle d'hygiene, laboratoire de > bacteriologie-hygiene, hopital de Rangueil, CHU de > Toulouse, 1, avenue Jean-Poulhes, TSA 50032, 31059 > Toulouse cedex 09, France. > bernard.malavaud@... > > The results of long-term follow-up of surgical site > infection (SSI) after aesthetical breast surgery are > reported. 205 consecutive patients operated from > 1/2000 to 3/2002 were followed for at least one > year. Postoperative incidents were observed in 26 > (12.7%) patients, including SSI in six (2.9%) > patients. After surgery, the mean time to SSI was > 113 days, with only two cases in the first > postoperative month. In all SSI cases, no antibiotic > prophylaxis had been given. The causative role of > infectious agents in breast implant capsule > occurrence is under investigation. > > PMID: 15820599 [PubMed - in process] > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2005 Report Share Posted June 5, 2005 mie was done in an old house in one of the oldest parts of New Orleans. With the termites and mold problems we have here in LA one must wonder how sterile it could have been? Toni__________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.