Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 You need P to hold a pregnancy or to protect the endometrium if you are using exogenous E. Since you have no endometrium, that is not a worry for you. Val -----Original Message-----From: rhythmicliving [mailto:rhythmicliving ]On Behalf Of jettabrouker I had a hysterectomy and sought the advice of the Dr. after hearing a Wiley talk, sounded to good to be true! She recommended that I NOT do the protocol. But put me on E only - now I hear from another Dr. that I should be on P as well? Anybody have any insight on that?thanks .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 Hi, Welcome to the group. From what I understand it depends on the woman and it depends on the dose. Last year Dr. Formby made of list of 11 good BHRT studies that included some with a rhythm and some with E only and some with both. He has told me flat out that studies show that menopausal women don't need P if they are using a dose that doesn't affect the endometrium http://rhythmicliving.org/rhythmicliving/Formby_Summary_11_BHRT_Studies.htmlHe also points out in his other article that if P is used, then vaginal application of a super small dose makes the most sense. http://rhythmicliving.org/rhythmicliving/Formby_P_dominance.htmlI think this one is a must read before using progesterone. Based on what he points to, where we put it on our bodies makes a very big difference in terms of how it is cleared from the body and how it protects the endometrium. LaurelI had a hysterectomy and sought the advice of the Dr. after hearing a Wiley talk, sounded to good to be true! She recommended that I NOT do the protocol. But put me on E only - now I hear from another Dr. that I should be on P as well? Anybody have any insight on that?thanksclick here for our webpage http://rhythmicliving.com/**The group conversation is informational in nature and is not intended as medical advice.** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 I had a hysterectomy as well and my doctor said I did not need P either. I am only using E. P is primarily to prevent build-up of the endometrial lining. Here is one reason one may want to add P if susceptible to epileptic seizures:"The brain has both estrogen and progesterone receptors. In women who have epilepsy, seizures are known to occur more frequently during times of high estrogen (late follicular phase and ovulation) and they are decreased when progesterone is high. In this sense, progesterone acts a a brain anesthetic to some degree. High doses of progesterone can be very sedating."From: http://www.wdxcyber.com/nmood11.htm.I will occasionally use a 20 mg low dose P at night for a week if particularly stressed or anxious. Mostly for its sedating effects. Madeleenjettabrouker wrote: I had a hysterectomy and sought the advice of the Dr. after hearing a Wiley talk, sounded to good to be true! She recommended that I NOT do the protocol. But put me on E only - now I hear from another Dr. that I should be on P as well? Anybody have any insight on that? thanks How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 I'm a hysterectomy girl,too. I've " been without " since age 21 (I'm 54 now). I'm on progesterone, estradiol, and testosterone. After I added all that bio-identical and transdermal stuff, I started to feel fabulous, fantastic, incredible, awesome, and wonderful. If we don't have our ovaries, we don't have the benefit of all they produced for our bodies. Remember, our ovaries didn't produce just estrogen. For example: Deficiency in progesterone leads to reduction of both glucocorticosteroids and mineralcorticoids such as cortisol (affects the adrenals which in turn can affect the thyroid which in turn will affect the entire metabolism). Progesterone also affects bones by stimulating the osteoblast cells that rematerialize and restore bone mass. So without enough " P " , there's a risk of osteoporosis. Without enough testosterone, energy levels take a nose dive as well as our libido's. I had considered doing the Wiley Protocol a while back, but instead, I just gave my body only what it told me (by symptoms) what it needed. I don't know how well that would work for anyone else, but it seems to be working wonderfully for me. Just my 2 cents... Sam (thyroid-less, ovary-less, iodized, and Armour-ized) k9gang@... Only E? I had a hysterectomy and sought the advice of the Dr. after hearing a Wiley talk, sounded to good to be true! She recommended that I NOT do the protocol. But put me on E only - now I hear from another Dr. that I should be on P as well? Anybody have any insight on that? thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 Hey Sam, Could you please give a reference on this...we are trying hard here to make sense of a lot of confusing information. If you say, this is from... page __ of blank book then we know how to file the info in our minds. Or you could say you are traveling with this info in your mind and you have no clue where you got it from.... at least it forewarns the reader's mind to file under "Something Sam remembers from some place". We are trying hard to inoculate ourselves against assertions that go unchallenged. It's part of the WP recovery project - no kidding. BTW, I appreciate you sharing your story about what works for you and how you pulled yourself out of a really terrible place by listening to your body and not giving up. There are new members and your story is inspiring and unusual. LaurelSam wrote:For example:Deficiency in progesterone leads to reduction of both glucocorticosteroidsand mineralcorticoids such as cortisol (affects the adrenals which in turncan affect the thyroid which in turn will affect the entire metabolism).Progesterone also affects bones by stimulating the osteoblast cells thatrematerialize and restore bone mass. So without enough "P", there's a riskof osteoporosis. Without enough testosterone, energy levels take a nose diveas well as our libido's.I Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 Progesterone also affects bones by stimulating the osteoblast cells thatrematerialize and restore bone mass. So without enough "P", there's a riskof osteoporosis. I think this is a Lee fabrication - more progesterone hype. It is not what research says. A couple articles are below. I listened to Lee for two miserable years and lost bone mass. Val Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Aug;94(2):225-8. Transdermal progesterone cream for vasomotor symptoms and postmenopausal bone loss.Leonetti HB, Longo S, Anasti JN.Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, St. Luke's Hospital, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, USA.OBJECTIVE: To determine effectiveness of transdermal progesterone cream for controlling vasomotor symptoms and preventing postmenopausal bone loss. METHODS: We randomly assigned 102 healthy women within 5 years of menopause to transdermal progesterone cream or placebo. Study subjects and investigators were masked until data analysis was completed. An initial evaluation included complete history, physical examination, bone mineral density determination, and serum studies (TSH, FSH, lipid profile, and chemistry profile). Subjects were instructed to apply a quarter teaspoon of cream (containing 20 mg progesterone or placebo) to the skin daily. Each woman received daily multivitamins and 1200 mg of calcium and were seen every 4 months for review of symptoms. Bone scans and serum chemistries were repeated after 1 year. RESULTS: Thirty of the 43 (69%) in the treatment group and 26 of the 47 (55%) in the placebo group complained initially of vasomotor symptoms. Improvement or resolution of vasomotor symptoms, as determined by review of weekly symptom diaries, was noted in 25 of 30 (83%) treatment subjects and five of 26 (19%) placebo subjects (P < .001). However, the number of women who showed gain in bone mineral density exceeding 1.2% did not differ (alpha = .05, power of 80%). CONCLUSION: Although we found no protective effect on bone density after 1 year, we did see a significant improvement in vasomotor symptoms in the treated group. Menopause. 2003 Jan-Feb;10(1):13-8. Transdermal progesterone and its effect on vasomotor symptoms, blood lipid levels, bone metabolic markers, moods, and quality of life for postmenopausal women.Wren BG, Champion SM, Willetts K, Manga RZ, Eden JA.Sydney Menopause Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, Australia. barrygwren@...OBJECTIVE: To determine whether transdermal progesterone cream has any effect on vasomotor symptoms, mood, sexual response, cardiovascular lipid levels, or bone mineral metabolic markers. DESIGN: A parallel, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing the effect of a transdermal cream containing a progesterone (32 mg daily) with a placebo cream. Eighty postmenopausal women in the Menopause Centre at the Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, were randomly allocated to receive either the progesterone cream or the placebo. They were evaluated using the Greene Climacteric Scale and the Menopause Quality of Life Questionnaire, as well as blood analysis for lipids and bone markers over a period of 12 weeks. Women were prescribed a cream containing either progesterone at 32 mg daily or a placebo cream for a period of 12 weeks. RESULTS: There was no detectable change in vasomotor symptoms, mood characteristics, or sexual feelings, nor was there any change in blood lipid levels or in bone metabolic markers, despite a slight elevation of blood progesterone levels. CONCLUSION: The use of the transdermal route to administer progesterone at 32 mg daily does not seem to allow sufficient hormone to enter the body to achieve a biological effect on lipid levels, bone mineral metabolic markers, vasomotor symptoms, or moods Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 It's what I learned when I wanted to know everything I could about hormones, before I started replacement again. I assumed this was just common knowledge stuff. Really. I need links? Ok. I went and looked for supporting links a litle while ago and found a ton. The following link seemed to combine everything: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progesterone Here's what they say about testosterone: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone And about Estrogen: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estrogen Sam Re: Only E? Hey Sam, Could you please give a reference on this...we are trying hard here to make sense of a lot of confusing information. If you say, this is from... page __ of blank book then we know how to file the info in our minds. Or you could say you are traveling with this info in your mind and you have no clue where you got it from.... at least it forewarns the reader's mind to file under " Something Sam remembers from some place " . We are trying hard to inoculate ourselves against assertions that go unchallenged. It's part of the WP recovery project - no kidding. BTW, I appreciate you sharing your story about what works for you and how you pulled yourself out of a really terrible place by listening to your body and not giving up. There are new members and your story is inspiring and unusual. Laurel ===== Sam wrote: For example: Deficiency in progesterone leads to reduction of both glucocorticosteroids and mineralcorticoids such as cortisol (affects the adrenals which in turn can affect the thyroid which in turn will affect the entire metabolism). Progesterone also affects bones by stimulating the osteoblast cells that rematerialize and restore bone mass. So without enough " P " , there's a risk of osteoporosis. Without enough testosterone, energy levels take a nose dive as well as our libido's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2006 Report Share Posted October 24, 2006 top posting... here's how it works here. What you are saying is often considered " common knowledge " , but that doesn't mean it is how everyone needs to do BHRT. Time to fact check. No mythology. No... " unopposed estrogen will give you cancer..blah, blah, blah... " You can say, " I took estrogen and felt awful, I added P and felt great.. " ok But analysis that is similar to Wiley's " low dribbling levels of estrogen will cause cancer... " As a woman said to Wiley in a support meeting, " HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT? " This is not a fortune telling group. We want some references. For example, I posted a link to 11 studies about BHRT prepared by Bent Formby, PhD when I said science points to the validity of E only protocols for menopausal women. Val hauled out the studies that looked at P. Laurel > It's what I learned when I wanted to know everything I could about > hormones, > before I started replacement again. I assumed this was just common > knowledge > stuff. Really. I need links? Ok. > > I went and looked for supporting links a litle while ago and found > a ton. > The following link seemed to combine everything: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progesterone > > Here's what they say about testosterone: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone > And about Estrogen: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estrogen > > Sam > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2006 Report Share Posted October 24, 2006 I know, but my initial reply to that one message was for the gal with the hysterectomy, because I had one as well and thought my input (experience) would be helpful. Ok, lemme tell y'all how I started all this. I'm thyroidless and ovaryless, and 3+yrs ago I was only on synthroid and too sick to live. I heard about whole thyroid meds online and investigated them. I started with wanting to know what were the things that the thyroid made/did. When I learned, I was happy to take Armour. I did the same with adrenals, and again with ovaries. What do ovaries do, what do they make, and I added THAT in the form of BHRT one hormone at a time, starting with progesterone, then estradiol, then testosterone. It wasn't that cut and dried because I dragged my feet, but I just read whatever stuff I could on sex hormones, and that included both pro and con. And I wanted to get back my "young woman" levels of hormones, hence the Wiley Protocol which I learned was NOT a one-size-fits-all thing. Along the same time I started to really believe that treating myself according to symptoms was the best way "I" could get to where my body wanted to be. I have gone to and read hundreds and hundreds of websites in my quest to learn about the things my body needs. And in general I learned that "not enough" and "too much" of "ANY" of those hormones was not a good thing. Basically I googled the name of the hormones (be they adrenal, thyroid, sex hormones, etc) and the word "deficiency" and then the word "overdose" and the words "side effects". That's how I learned. Uh, so I should just go out and ride my motorcycle, huh? Sam Re: Only E? top posting... here's how it works here.What you are saying is often considered "common knowledge", but that doesn't mean it is how everyone needs to do BHRT. Time to fact check.No mythology. No... "unopposed estrogen will give you cancer..blah, blah, blah... "You can say, "I took estrogen and felt awful, I added P and felt great.." ok But analysis that is similar to Wiley's "low dribbling levels of estrogen will cause cancer..."As a woman said to Wiley in a support meeting, "HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT?"This is not a fortune telling group. We want some references.For example, I posted a link to 11 studies about BHRT prepared by Bent Formby, PhD when I said science points to the validity of E only protocols for menopausal women. Val hauled out the studies that looked at P.Laurel> It's what I learned when I wanted to know everything I could about > hormones,> before I started replacement again. I assumed this was just common > knowledge> stuff. Really. I need links? Ok.>> I went and looked for supporting links a litle while ago and found > a ton.> The following link seemed to combine everything:> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progesterone>> Here's what they say about testosterone:> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone> And about Estrogen: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estrogen>> Sam> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2006 Report Share Posted October 25, 2006 Thank you everyone for all the advice. I appreciate it! This is a journey! > > I had a hysterectomy and sought the advice of the Dr. after hearing a Wiley talk, sounded to > good to be true! She recommended that I NOT do the protocol. But put me on E only - now I > hear from another Dr. that I should be on P as well? Anybody have any insight on that? > > thanks > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.