Guest guest Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 I'm not doing this but it shouldn't be mutually exclusive. Third-party payors in Georgia won't allow for a membership fee if you bill them for visits, but this is not true in many other states. For an individual patient, I could decide to not have them pay a membership fee if they had an insurance that prohibits it. Problem for my practice is that the accounting/admin become a nightmare. Much easier to treat everyone the same and have them deal with their insurance carriers if they so choose. Good luck. Always happy to hear when people decide not to play the insurance game; it's not a step to take without careful thought but it can work. Chad > > Is anyone doing a combination of keeping 1 or 2 best payors combined with a > direct care model? > > Or is doing that mutually exclusive? > > Or even prohibited by most insurance contracts in some way? > > For example, keep Insurances #1 and #2 because they pay well and are easy to > work with. > > But have a direct care model for everyone else -- with or without a fee. > > I don't recall if anyone has been doing this. > > Thanks > > Locke, MD > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.