OFF TOPIC - The Fraud of Medical Marijuana

[Guest guest]

The Fraud of Medical Marijuana

Pot smokers usually agree that smoking pot is more fun than

drinking alcohol. Pot smokers seem like a harmless lot. There are

no pot smokers whom you can see laying in the gutter covered with

their own excrement, urine and puke. They generally do not dig

through garbage cans for something to eat or beg for money to

feed their pot habit. Neither are these people found in the

emergency wards after passing out and falling under a tram or an

automobile or having their heads wrapped in bandages after

blacking out and falling flat onto their faces. You do not

usually find these pot smokers belligerently picking fights and

suffering the cuts and contusions that result thereby. Neither do

they suffer from liver and kidney malfunction, high cancer rates,

arthritis and heart disease. They do not have a high incidence of

auto accidents where they drive over innocent pedestrians. Also,

arson, destruction of property, vandalism, assault and battery,

murder, theft, etc., are not noticeably high among this group.

However, you DO find such things and many other evils besides

among those people who drink alcohol to excess.

So, why is it that alcohol is condoned and encouraged while

marijuana smoking is prohibited? Who writes the laws that allows

this discrepancy to occur? As is usual in the West, the laws are

written by those who benefit from them and not by those who must

suffer under them.

And so, once again, we must ask ourselves the question: Who

Benefits? Obviously the first beneficiary is the booze industry.

Who else benefits from the drunkenness of the People?

When drunks fall down, they need doctors and hospitals.

Drunks get into legal trouble and need lawyers. Gambling and

prostitution are vices which benefit from the drunkenness of their

clients.

In short, all of the services that benefit from drunks becoming

inebriated and drunks destroying themselves and others, are

services that are highly profitable. So, of course,they write laws

that benefit themselves. They promote alcohol consumption and

discourage the smoking of marijuana. And when marijuana is illegal,

then its price is very high so this is beneficial to the criminals of

Mexico and other pot growing locations who get high profits from

their crops and for transportation and distribution. If marijuana

growing was legal, then the price would be nearly zero because it can

be grown anywhere. Pot smokers would grow their own intoxicants and

drink less alcohol.

Now, I am not condoning the smoking of pot but merely pointing

out something odd about the medical marijuana debate. In this

debate, society is being manipulated by the Media to be

either for or against medical marijuana for sick people. Those

with cancer and other debilitating diseases have all agreed that

by smoking pot they are able to withstand the effects of

chemotherapy and to eat their food without up-chucking.

But the actual debate is being waged for the hearts and minds of

the ordinary citizens who neither smoke pot nor have a disease.

The debate is being waged for the votes of the average citizen.

The citizens are being asked to decide medical drug laws for

which they are neither qualified nor interested in deciding. Why

is this?

You see, the issue is really not at all about whether marijuana

should be given to sick people. From a medical standpoint, if the

drug relieves suffering without dangerous side-effects, then it

is a good therapy. So, the ordinary citizen should not be

required to decide whether it should be allowed or not since it

is a medical decision alone. The ten thousand other drugs that

physicians use are not placed before a committee of laymen to

decide whether they should be used or not, so what is so special

about marijuana? Why is such an issue put on the ballot for the

uninformed and uneducated people to vote on? Quite simply -- the

people are being brainwashed.

When the Media rages through both sides of the debate --

some saying " Yes " and some saying " No " -- without

really attempting to clarify the situation, then you know that

neither a " yes " nor a " no " is their goal. The main goal in fomenting

this debate is to brainwash the People with the idea that marijuana

is a pharmacological drug that is prescribed by doctors to people who

are sick and NOT a recreational substance on the same level as

alcohol. They want the People to begin thinking of marijuana as

something that a pharmacy dispenses for a fee and not as an

agricultural product that anyone can grow. They want to keep

marijuana banned as an illegal drug even though the marijuana plant

produces more paper pulp per acre than do pulp forests. The marijuana

plant has 10,000 useful products that can be made from it including a

very nice. soft cloth, strong rope, eatable seeds, as well as oils,

paints and plastics. It is an extremely valuable agricultural product

that can benefit any country that grows it commercially. But because

it causes those in liquor, medicine and law to not make money,

they want it banned. Or if not banned outright, they want it

classified as a controlled substance in such a way that they can

reap a profit by selling it through their already established

commercial channels.

The Medical Marijuana Debate is just another swindle. Its

goal is not to determine the advisability of letting cancer

patients take an illegal drug or not. After all, most of the

drugs that cancer patients take are not only highly illegal

without a prescription but extremely toxic as well. But there is

no debate on whether to allow cancer patients to take morphine

patches or swallow a hundred other drugs prescribed by their

doctors. Why is this?

The goal of the Medical Marijuana Debate is to convince people

that marijuana should be a controlled substance that only the

doctors and pharmacists should be allowed to dispense. Those

in the medical profession, in the legal profession and in

the liquor industry are bribing the politicians. You see, once

they can make money, then ANYTHING is okay to do. An example

is the Las Vegas gambling arena controlled by organized crime

syndicates where EVERY vice is condoned.

But if they lose money, then it is made to be illegal no

matter how beneficial it is to all of the rest of Mankind.

We deserve what we allow.