Re: How long does LDN take to work?

[Guest guest]

, that's a tough question to answer. Some people report experiencing

immediate symptom relief. Others have had none, but continue to take LDN

because it prevents progression. Dr. Bihari would tell you that it's the

main reason to take LDN. I've had a little bladder relief, but it took more

than six months to have even that--maybe longer. It has done absolutely

nothing for my legs.

Someone mentioned the CNN show. I thought it was AWFUL. 1) They didn't

accept call-ins--I was poised to pick up the phone and talk about LDN; 2) at

the bottom of the screen was a dire message about crippling and blinding,

though everyone on the panel was la-di-dah upbeat; 3) there was no

discussion of alternatives to the ABCR drugs, such as LDN, supplements,

diet, exercise, etc.; 4) there was no talk about the latest research;and 5)

it taught the public NOTHING. They had an expert on, but what did he

contribute? Everyday I try to embrace the message of " be positive, " but

they made it sound so damn easy that I found it rather insulting.

And finally, please please please erase prior e-mails before hitting " send. "

The daily e-mail digests are often every long and it's annoying sometimes to

have to scroll down past the same messages over and over again. This is ONE

of the reasons that many " LDN oldtimers " (people taking LDN for over two

years) dropped out of the group.

I think we all need to remember to be considerate and respectful of one

another.

[Guest guest]

Hi , I guess it is a tough question. I just thought maybe there

was a common time from start to noticing improvements. I had the same

dilema when I was on the abcr's. Not knowing if it worked or not.

Course I also had wicked side effects to deal with. Not to mention the

horrific costs. No med. is worth that much!

Thanks for trying to answer!

Take Care

>

> , that's a tough question to answer. Some people report

experiencing

> immediate symptom relief. Others have had none, but continue to

take LDN

> because it prevents progression. Dr. Bihari would tell you that it's

the

> main reason to take LDN.

[Guest guest]

The Teri Garr interview: I didnt get to see it but read the transcript of it online--- it seemed idiotic and useless to me.

nola

[low dose naltrexone] Re: How long does LDN take to work?

, that's a tough question to answer. Some people report experiencing immediate symptom relief. Others have had none, but continue to take LDN because it prevents progression. Dr. Bihari would tell you that it's the main reason to take LDN. I've had a little bladder relief, but it took more than six months to have even that--maybe longer. It has done absolutely nothing for my legs.Someone mentioned the CNN show. I thought it was AWFUL. 1) They didn't accept call-ins--I was poised to pick up the phone and talk about LDN; 2) at the bottom of the screen was a dire message about crippling and blinding, though everyone on the panel was la-di-dah upbeat; 3) there was no discussion of alternatives to the ABCR drugs, such as LDN, supplements, diet, exercise, etc.; 4) there was no talk about the latest research;and 5) it taught the public NOTHING. They had an expert on, but what did he contribute? Everyday I try to embrace the message of "be positive," but they made it sound so damn easy that I found it rather insulting.And finally, please please please erase prior e-mails before hitting "send." The daily e-mail digests are often every long and it's annoying sometimes to have to scroll down past the same messages over and over again. This is ONE of the reasons that many "LDN oldtimers" (people taking LDN for over two years) dropped out of the group.I think we all need to remember to be considerate and respectful of one another.

[Guest guest]

It was.

Regards,

Tom

[low dose naltrexone] Re: How long does LDN take to work?

, that's a tough question to answer. Some people report experiencing immediate symptom relief. Others have had none, but continue to take LDN because it prevents progression. Dr. Bihari would tell you that it's the main reason to take LDN. I've had a little bladder relief, but it took more than six months to have even that--maybe longer. It has done absolutely nothing for my legs.Someone mentioned the CNN show. I thought it was AWFUL. 1) They didn't accept call-ins--I was poised to pick up the phone and talk about LDN; 2) at the bottom of the screen was a dire message about crippling and blinding, though everyone on the panel was la-di-dah upbeat; 3) there was no discussion of alternatives to the ABCR drugs, such as LDN, supplements, diet, exercise, etc.; 4) there was no talk about the latest research;and 5) it taught the public NOTHING. They had an expert on, but what did he contribute? Everyday I try to embrace the message of "be positive," but they made it sound so damn easy that I found it rather insulting.And finally, please please please erase prior e-mails before hitting "send." The daily e-mail digests are often every long and it's annoying sometimes to have to scroll down past the same messages over and over again. This is ONE of the reasons that many "LDN oldtimers" (people taking LDN for over two years) dropped out of the group.I think we all need to remember to be considerate and respectful of one another.