Guest guest Posted June 17, 2009 Report Share Posted June 17, 2009 I know that a lot of ACT is experiential work, but I think part of that is understanding the philosophy behind it. Of course there are times where you should move past places where you are getting hung up or don't fully understand a concept - but I also think that discussion could help out as well. My question is in the section under " Why thinking has such an impact " . The first question is in the third paragraph. " Cognitive fusion refers to the tendency to allow thought to dominate other sources of behavioral regulation because of the failure to pay attention to the process of relating over and above the products of relating " . So what would some examples be of other sources of behavioral regulation. And the earlier part of chapter two with all of the relations confused me a bit and I think that is what is coming into play when talking about the " process of relating " . If we could talk a little bit about the process of relating more in depth then just the relational terms. Or maybe it is similar to just watching your mind but I think there is something more at work here - that would open another door for me. The second question comes at the bottom of that same page " cognitive fusion also mean that evaluations can become attached to events as if they were in the event, not just in our thoughts about the event. This transforms not only the thought but also the functions of the actual event " (57). So maybe if we could elaborate on the idea of how saliva becomes disgusting but maybe if some real life examples could be used as well. What, specifically, does it mean to say " functions of the actual event? Its alright to go in depth and hit the nitty gritty. Thanks, Jimmy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.