Guest guest Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Hi Lesley, I agree with every word you wrote below. I am glad I am not totally alone here! I was beginning to think I was being seen as a an anti-ACT intruder<grin> Louise > > > > > > > > > > Think back to some time in the past, say 10 years ago. > > > > > > > > > > What was the quality of your life at the time? Was it good? Was it bad? > > > > > > > > > > How were you feeling? Were you happy? Were you depressed? Were you excited? Were you anxious? Were you energized? Were you overwhelmed? > > > > > > > > > > What was going on in your mental world? What sorts of things occupied your mental day-to-day? > > > > > > > > > > Let's say that you were in pain, suffering over some unwanted state of affairs. Maybe a failed romance, or a career disappointment, or a psychological struggle, or some other problem. You were unhappy. > > > > > > > > > > Would it help if God, or the white queen, or whoever, were to say, > > > > > > > > > > " You know what, I'm going to change that. I'm going to change how you were feeling at that time. I'm going to erase the pain that you were experiencing and replace it with the highest form of happiness imaginable. By the stroke of a magic wand, it is now officially true that ten years ago, you were on top of the world. " > > > > > > > > > > How would you respond? Would this gift be good news, would it be a cause for celebration? > > > > > > > > > > " How wonderful that it is now true that I was on top of the world 10 years ago. Let's celebrate this joyous news! " > > > > > > > > > > Is that how you would respond? > > > > > > > > > > No. You don't care. How you were feeling then doesn't matter anymore. The moment that existed 10 years ago, whatever it entailed experientially, came and went. Now, it's gone, empty, nothing. How it felt is not even a concern: for all we care, it might as well have never happened. > > > > > > > > > > Now, here comes the important point. > > > > > > > > > > If we look closely, we will notice that this right here--this moment of our lives right now, this happiness, this sadness, this boredom, this joy, this suffering, this victory, this loss, whatever it is that occupies us so heavily--it will soon be like that: gone, empty, nothing. > > > > > > > > > > Whether it ever happened will make no difference in the grand scheme of things. It will only exist in those who can still remember it, and even then, it won't be able to *satisfy* anyone or anything. > > > > > > > > > > Why, then, should we dwell on it, or fixate on it, or lament over it, or cling to it, or fight with it, or struggle with it? Regardless of what we do with it, it goes to the same place that every prior moment of our lives, whether good or bad, has gone, and it goes there quickly, before we can even notice. > > > > > > > > > > When we perceive the events of our lives in this light, they cease to be so important, so heavy, so weighty. They lose their tight grip on us. We can let go of our expectations and our demands for how they will unfold, because we know that no matter how they do unfold, it is only a very small amount of time--indeed, an instant--until they unfold into nonexistence, a permanent state of didn't-matter-anyway. > > > > > > > > > > Contemplating this fact inclines me to relax, to realize that nothing is really really that big of a deal. It becomes easier for me to let go of my frustration and sorrow at the fact that this life of mine doesn't seem to want to follow my wishes. > > > > > > > > > > Now, I expect that some will read what I am saying and think that it is a nihilistic, depressed, bleak take on life. The mind sees that its own states are constantly fleeting, and it naturally says " Oh no, how sad, how terrible, how tragic! " > > > > > > > > > > But that's just another reaction of the mind. It's not privileged, it's just an interpretation. > > > > > > > > > > Does the fact that all things in life eventually fade away mean that we should quit engaging with life? No, I don't think so. I think it means that we should engage with life *without* getting caught up in the unhelpful attachments of our minds. Seeing that the objects of those attachments are intrinsically fleeting, we should shift our focus towards just doing what needs to be done, doing our business, fulfilling our responsibilities, living out our values, and so on, without holding onto anticipations, demands, expectations, evaluations, comparisons, and so on--those 'extra' things the mind adds that tend to bring us so much suffering. We do what needs to be done, what is right and good to do, and we leave the situation at that. > > > > > > > > > > To summarize, then, here is what I take from the idea of impermanence. When you find yourself in a struggle with this moment of life, suffering over the fact that it is not what you want it to be, remember that the wheels of time, in their constant movement, just erased it, for all of eternity. They just erased it. It's gone. They will continue to erase anything and everything that comes up after. Time brings everything to a point where it didn't matter anyway. So relax, let go, and just be. The struggle is a waste of time. > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > > > I don't get how believing that every moment is erased helps anyone as it is not the way humans are made. We have memories. Yes, they cause pain but they are also part of what makes us human and helps us survive. We'd not survive as a species if we had no memory of pain. > > > > > > > > It doesn't help me survive personally to tell myself that my existence consists of a series of disconnected moments that are erased serially! > > > > > > > > I agree that it would be pointless to wish for a happiness fairy to tell me I was blissfully happy ten years ago. But if I had been happy ten years ago that would have affected the course of my life so no I wouldn't say I don't care. I would say that it is pointless trying to change what has happened. i wouldn't say it is pointless rying to learn from my past though. > > > > > > > > There is surely a difference between living in the moment and pretending we have no history? > > > > > > > > Louise > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Maybe I'm the one out in left field, but I totally get what is saying and what he is not saying. He is not saying that to live in the moment, it's a good idea to tell yourself and others that everything will be wiped out, so what does anything matter, anyway. He is just pointing out the fundamental truth that time will erase all moments and memories -- and to be aware of this could make living in the moment less worrisome as we realize that the current moment is all we really have. So why attach so much importance and weight to our memories? No, don't get rid of them! Just carry them with you lightly. That's what I get, and I don't understand the counter critique. But am enjoying reading it all! Helena Re: Impermanence and Letting Go Hi Ginny and !> > >> > > Think back to some time in the past, say 10 years ago. > > > > > > What was the quality of your life at the time? Was it good? Was it bad? > > > > > > How were you feeling? Were you happy? Were you depressed? Were you excited? Were you anxious? Were you energized? Were you overwhelmed? > > > > > > What was going on in your mental world? What sorts of things occupied your mental day-to-day? > > > > > > Let's say that you were in pain, suffering over some unwanted state of affairs. Maybe a failed romance, or a career disappointment, or a psychological struggle, or some other problem. You were unhappy. > > > > > > Would it help if God, or the white queen, or whoever, were to say, > > > > > > "You know what, I'm going to change that. I'm going to change how you were feeling at that time. I'm going to erase the pain that you were experiencing and replace it with the highest form of happiness imaginable. By the stroke of a magic wand, it is now officially true that ten years ago, you were on top of the world." > > > > > > How would you respond? Would this gift be good news, would it be a cause for celebration? > > > > > > "How wonderful that it is now true that I was on top of the world 10 years ago. Let's celebrate this joyous news!" > > > > > > Is that how you would respond? > > > > > > No. You don't care. How you were feeling then doesn't matter anymore. The moment that existed 10 years ago, whatever it entailed experientially, came and went. Now, it's gone, empty, nothing. How it felt is not even a concern: for all we care, it might as well have never happened. > > > > > > Now, here comes the important point. > > > > > > If we look closely, we will notice that this right here--this moment of our lives right now, this happiness, this sadness, this boredom, this joy, this suffering, this victory, this loss, whatever it is that occupies us so heavily--it will soon be like that: gone, empty, nothing. > > > > > > Whether it ever happened will make no difference in the grand scheme of things. It will only exist in those who can still remember it, and even then, it won't be able to *satisfy* anyone or anything. > > > > > > Why, then, should we dwell on it, or fixate on it, or lament over it, or cling to it, or fight with it, or struggle with it? Regardless of what we do with it, it goes to the same place that every prior moment of our lives, whether good or bad, has gone, and it goes there quickly, before we can even notice. > > > > > > When we perceive the events of our lives in this light, they cease to be so important, so heavy, so weighty. They lose their tight grip on us. We can let go of our expectations and our demands for how they will unfold, because we know that no matter how they do unfold, it is only a very small amount of time--indeed, an instant--until they unfold into nonexistence, a permanent state of didn't-matter- anyway. > > > > > > Contemplating this fact inclines me to relax, to realize that nothing is really really that big of a deal. It becomes easier for me to let go of my frustration and sorrow at the fact that this life of mine doesn't seem to want to follow my wishes. > > > > > > Now, I expect that some will read what I am saying and think that it is a nihilistic, depressed, bleak take on life. The mind sees that its own states are constantly fleeting, and it naturally says "Oh no, how sad, how terrible, how tragic!" > > > > > > But that's just another reaction of the mind. It's not privileged, it's just an interpretation. > > > > > > Does the fact that all things in life eventually fade away mean that we should quit engaging with life? No, I don't think so. I think it means that we should engage with life *without* getting caught up in the unhelpful attachments of our minds. Seeing that the objects of those attachments are intrinsically fleeting, we should shift our focus towards just doing what needs to be done, doing our business, fulfilling our responsibilities, living out our values, and so on, without holding onto anticipations, demands, expectations, evaluations, comparisons, and so on--those 'extra' things the mind adds that tend to bring us so much suffering. We do what needs to be done, what is right and good to do, and we leave the situation at that. > > > > > > To summarize, then, here is what I take from the idea of impermanence. When you find yourself in a struggle with this moment of life, suffering over the fact that it is not what you want it to be, remember that the wheels of time, in their constant movement, just erased it, for all of eternity. They just erased it. It's gone. They will continue to erase anything and everything that comes up after. Time brings everything to a point where it didn't matter anyway. So relax, let go, and just be. The struggle is a waste of time. > > > > > > Best wishes,> > > --> > > > Hi ,> > > > I don't get how believing that every moment is erased helps anyone as it is not the way humans are made. We have memories. Yes, they cause pain but they are also part of what makes us human and helps us survive. We'd not survive as a species if we had no memory of pain.> > > > It doesn't help me survive personally to tell myself that my existence consists of a series of disconnected moments that are erased serially! > > > > I agree that it would be pointless to wish for a happiness fairy to tell me I was blissfully happy ten years ago. But if I had been happy ten years ago that would have affected the course of my life so no I wouldn't say I don't care. I would say that it is pointless trying to change what has happened. i wouldn't say it is pointless rying to learn from my past though.> > > > There is surely a difference between living in the moment and pretending we have no history?> > > > Louise> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 No Louise...I am not referring to you or to anyone ( after all who am I to judge anyone ) I am referring to the actual posting that it contains the thought processes of people in two very different states ( thoughts that apply to people that are totally enlightened and have no anxieties , and thoughts that apply to people who are trying to rid themselves of anxieties and other disorders ).As far as the group here, I believe it consists mostly of ACT-users, with some therapists and the founder watching the postings. But given that people who use ACT have read other things and ACT is not an island of knowledge.....many other concepts get in the mix.B/RegardsibrahimTo: ACT_for_the_Public Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:16:30 AMSubject: Re: Impermanence and Letting Go > > > > > > > > > > Think back to some time in the past, say 10 years ago. > > > > > > > > > > What was the quality of your life at the time? Was it good? Was it bad? > > > > > > > > > > How were you feeling? Were you happy? Were you depressed? Were you excited? Were you anxious? Were you energized? Were you overwhelmed? > > > > > > > > > > What was going on in your mental world? What sorts of things occupied your mental day-to-day? > > > > > > > > > > Let's say that you were in pain, suffering over some unwanted state of affairs. Maybe a failed romance, or a career disappointment, or a psychological struggle, or some other problem. You were unhappy. > > > > > > > > > > Would it help if God, or the white queen, or whoever, were to say, > > > > > > > > > > "You know what, I'm going to change that. I'm going to change how you were feeling at that time. I'm going to erase the pain that you were experiencing and replace it with the highest form of happiness imaginable. By the stroke of a magic wand, it is now officially true that ten years ago, you were on top of the world." > > > > > > > > > > How would you respond? Would this gift be good news, would it be a cause for celebration? > > > > > > > > > > "How wonderful that it is now true that I was on top of the world 10 years ago. Let's celebrate this joyous news!" > > > > > > > > > > Is that how you would respond? > > > > > > > > > > No. You don't care. How you were feeling then doesn't matter anymore. The moment that existed 10 years ago, whatever it entailed experientially, came and went. Now, it's gone, empty, nothing. How it felt is not even a concern: for all we care, it might as well have never happened. > > > > > > > > > > Now, here comes the important point. > > > > > > > > > > If we look closely, we will notice that this right here--this moment of our lives right now, this happiness, this sadness, this boredom, this joy, this suffering, this victory, this loss, whatever it is that occupies us so heavily--it will soon be like that: gone, empty, nothing. > > > > > > > > > > Whether it ever happened will make no difference in the grand scheme of things. It will only exist in those who can still remember it, and even then, it won't be able to *satisfy* anyone or anything. > > > > > > > > > > Why, then, should we dwell on it, or fixate on it, or lament over it, or cling to it, or fight with it, or struggle with it? Regardless of what we do with it, it goes to the same place that every prior moment of our lives, whether good or bad, has gone, and it goes there quickly, before we can even notice. > > > > > > > > > > When we perceive the events of our lives in this light, they cease to be so important, so heavy, so weighty. They lose their tight grip on us. We can let go of our expectations and our demands for how they will unfold, because we know that no matter how they do unfold, it is only a very small amount of time--indeed, an instant--until they unfold into nonexistence, a permanent state of didn't-matter- anyway. > > > > > > > > > > Contemplating this fact inclines me to relax, to realize that nothing is really really that big of a deal. It becomes easier for me to let go of my frustration and sorrow at the fact that this life of mine doesn't seem to want to follow my wishes. > > > > > > > > > > Now, I expect that some will read what I am saying and think that it is a nihilistic, depressed, bleak take on life. The mind sees that its own states are constantly fleeting, and it naturally says "Oh no, how sad, how terrible, how tragic!" > > > > > > > > > > But that's just another reaction of the mind. It's not privileged, it's just an interpretation. > > > > > > > > > > Does the fact that all things in life eventually fade away mean that we should quit engaging with life? No, I don't think so. I think it means that we should engage with life *without* getting caught up in the unhelpful attachments of our minds. Seeing that the objects of those attachments are intrinsically fleeting, we should shift our focus towards just doing what needs to be done, doing our business, fulfilling our responsibilities, living out our values, and so on, without holding onto anticipations, demands, expectations, evaluations, comparisons, and so on--those 'extra' things the mind adds that tend to bring us so much suffering. We do what needs to be done, what is right and good to do, and we leave the situation at that. > > > > > > > > > > To summarize, then, here is what I take from the idea of impermanence. When you find yourself in a struggle with this moment of life, suffering over the fact that it is not what you want it to be, remember that the wheels of time, in their constant movement, just erased it, for all of eternity. They just erased it. It's gone. They will continue to erase anything and everything that comes up after. Time brings everything to a point where it didn't matter anyway. So relax, let go, and just be. The struggle is a waste of time. > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > > > I don't get how believing that every moment is erased helps anyone as it is not the way humans are made. We have memories. Yes, they cause pain but they are also part of what makes us human and helps us survive. We'd not survive as a species if we had no memory of pain. > > > > > > > > It doesn't help me survive personally to tell myself that my existence consists of a series of disconnected moments that are erased serially! > > > > > > > > I agree that it would be pointless to wish for a happiness fairy to tell me I was blissfully happy ten years ago. But if I had been happy ten years ago that would have affected the course of my life so no I wouldn't say I don't care. I would say that it is pointless trying to change what has happened. i wouldn't say it is pointless rying to learn from my past though. > > > > > > > > There is surely a difference between living in the moment and pretending we have no history? > > > > > > > > Louise > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 > > Maybe I'm the one out in left field, but I totally get what is saying and what he is not saying. He is not saying that to live in the moment, it's a good idea to tell yourself and others that everything will be wiped out, so what does anything matter, anyway. He is just pointing out the fundamental truth that time will erase all moments and memories -- and to be aware of this could make living in the moment less worrisome as we realize that the current moment is all we really have. So why attach so much importance and weight to our memories? No, don't get rid of them! Just carry them with you lightly. > > That's what I get, and I don't understand the counter critique. But am enjoying reading it all! > > Helena We are all different, Helena. We all react differently to being told time will erase all moments. I don't feel that it helps me live in the moment to be told that but others will. Your question Why attach so much imposrtance and weight to our memories? is a good one but it also seems to assume that everyone does and therefore the answer is to attach *no* importance to history. The message didn't come across to me as a light message, quite the opposite<smile> But again I think it proves that we all come to messages and react to them in the light of our own personal history!!! So it appears that giving advice to someone that the moment is erased is contraversial as until they are living life as if their past moments have been wiped out they will come to every new idea with their own personal perspective anyway or what some might call baggage<smile> You would believe it but as I write I am aware that someone on TV is talking about a friend who was mildly depressed being put into a home where all the residents were suffering from Alzheimers and the negative effect it had on her! Louise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Very well written Lesley....I agree on the concepts, but am more struck with the beauty of the writing : it is concise, complete, flows, orderly....etc. I wonder what brought your writing to this superior level...if I may ask.b/regardsibrahimTo: ACT_for_the_Public Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 12:40:24 AMSubject: Re: Impermanence and Letting Go True; Alzheimer's patients have had their memories erased - more precisely, they do not seem able to remember the past, even the recent past. How this relates to what you were writing: Whether the memories are destroyed or simply not accessible, Alzheimer's sufferers can't access that knowledge anymore. Their lives are, as best as we can tell, a disjointed series of moments, like beads on a string that has come undone. It seems that our ability to live functionally and carry out our intentions in the present depends upon our being able to remember the past, doesn't it? As well, it depends upon our being able to be aware of the future, even though we do not know what it consists of. As humans, we engage in the present in a context of both past and future. As to your contention that people, if told they were happy ten years ago, would not care about it now: I beg to differ. Therapy is full of stories of people who, upon reframing their perspective of past events, find that it affects how they experience their lives in the present. Similarly, many people report that remembering, and being grateful, for past joys is a comfort in difficult times, and gives them strength. I've worked with elderly people, and what I've noticed is that the ones who live long are often the grateful ones - and yet it's not that they had easy lives. I appreciate that you acknowledge that this is simply your take on life. I also acknowledge that you state that you think we should engage with the present and do what is "right and good". However, I question your use of the term that one day, what is now present will "not matter". In order for something to "not matter" it has to not have an impact. (I'd also point out that if you want to stay present focused, you could also argue that the fact that 100 years hence something would supposedly "not matter" doesn't matter, so to speak, right now: in the present one's suffering certainly does impact the person undergoing it, may impact others, and that impact may "matter" to anyone who has compassion for those involved.) I do not think that "impermanence" implies that what is happening now means that one day it "won't matter", or "will no longer have an impact." Maybe I prefer the Native American idea that one should act for seven generations to come: how one acts now will affect the lives of those to come for many years. Similarly, how people acted in the past still affects lives today, regardless of whether we remember anything about it or not! The past is no more, true. But the consequences of past actions are most certainly present in the here and now. And our present actions will certainly impact the future. Perhaps I am misunderstanding how you intend your use of the term, but that is how it reads to me. all the best, Les > > > > > > > > Think back to some time in the past, say 10 years ago. > > > > > > > > What was the quality of your life at the time? Was it good? Was it bad? > > > > > > > > How were you feeling? Were you happy? Were you depressed? Were you excited? Were you anxious? Were you energized? Were you overwhelmed? > > > > > > > > What was going on in your mental world? What sorts of things occupied your mental day-to-day? > > > > > > > > Let's say that you were in pain, suffering over some unwanted state of affairs. Maybe a failed romance, or a career disappointment, or a psychological struggle, or some other problem. You were unhappy. > > > > > > > > Would it help if God, or the white queen, or whoever, were to say, > > > > > > > > "You know what, I'm going to change that. I'm going to change how you were feeling at that time. I'm going to erase the pain that you were experiencing and replace it with the highest form of happiness imaginable. By the stroke of a magic wand, it is now officially true that ten years ago, you were on top of the world." > > > > > > > > How would you respond? Would this gift be good news, would it be a cause for celebration? > > > > > > > > "How wonderful that it is now true that I was on top of the world 10 years ago. Let's celebrate this joyous news!" > > > > > > > > Is that how you would respond? > > > > > > > > No. You don't care. How you were feeling then doesn't matter anymore. The moment that existed 10 years ago, whatever it entailed experientially, came and went. Now, it's gone, empty, nothing. How it felt is not even a concern: for all we care, it might as well have never happened. > > > > > > > > Now, here comes the important point. > > > > > > > > If we look closely, we will notice that this right here--this moment of our lives right now, this happiness, this sadness, this boredom, this joy, this suffering, this victory, this loss, whatever it is that occupies us so heavily--it will soon be like that: gone, empty, nothing. > > > > > > > > Whether it ever happened will make no difference in the grand scheme of things. It will only exist in those who can still remember it, and even then, it won't be able to *satisfy* anyone or anything. > > > > > > > > Why, then, should we dwell on it, or fixate on it, or lament over it, or cling to it, or fight with it, or struggle with it? Regardless of what we do with it, it goes to the same place that every prior moment of our lives, whether good or bad, has gone, and it goes there quickly, before we can even notice. > > > > > > > > When we perceive the events of our lives in this light, they cease to be so important, so heavy, so weighty. They lose their tight grip on us. We can let go of our expectations and our demands for how they will unfold, because we know that no matter how they do unfold, it is only a very small amount of time--indeed, an instant--until they unfold into nonexistence, a permanent state of didn't-matter- anyway. > > > > > > > > Contemplating this fact inclines me to relax, to realize that nothing is really really that big of a deal. It becomes easier for me to let go of my frustration and sorrow at the fact that this life of mine doesn't seem to want to follow my wishes. > > > > > > > > Now, I expect that some will read what I am saying and think that it is a nihilistic, depressed, bleak take on life. The mind sees that its own states are constantly fleeting, and it naturally says "Oh no, how sad, how terrible, how tragic!" > > > > > > > > But that's just another reaction of the mind. It's not privileged, it's just an interpretation. > > > > > > > > Does the fact that all things in life eventually fade away mean that we should quit engaging with life? No, I don't think so. I think it means that we should engage with life *without* getting caught up in the unhelpful attachments of our minds. Seeing that the objects of those attachments are intrinsically fleeting, we should shift our focus towards just doing what needs to be done, doing our business, fulfilling our responsibilities, living out our values, and so on, without holding onto anticipations, demands, expectations, evaluations, comparisons, and so on--those 'extra' things the mind adds that tend to bring us so much suffering. We do what needs to be done, what is right and good to do, and we leave the situation at that. > > > > > > > > To summarize, then, here is what I take from the idea of impermanence. When you find yourself in a struggle with this moment of life, suffering over the fact that it is not what you want it to be, remember that the wheels of time, in their constant movement, just erased it, for all of eternity. They just erased it. It's gone. They will continue to erase anything and everything that comes up after. Time brings everything to a point where it didn't matter anyway. So relax, let go, and just be. The struggle is a waste of time. > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > -- > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > I don't get how believing that every moment is erased helps anyone as it is not the way humans are made. We have memories. Yes, they cause pain but they are also part of what makes us human and helps us survive. We'd not survive as a species if we had no memory of pain. > > > > > > It doesn't help me survive personally to tell myself that my existence consists of a series of disconnected moments that are erased serially! > > > > > > I agree that it would be pointless to wish for a happiness fairy to tell me I was blissfully happy ten years ago. But if I had been happy ten years ago that would have affected the course of my life so no I wouldn't say I don't care. I would say that it is pointless trying to change what has happened. i wouldn't say it is pointless rying to learn from my past though. > > > > > > There is surely a difference between living in the moment and pretending we have no history? > > > > > > Louise > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 > > > > No Louise...I am not referring to you or to anyone ( after all who am I to judge anyone ) I am referring to the actual posting that it contains the thought processes of people in two very different states ( thoughts that apply to people that are totally enlightened and have no anxieties , and thoughts that apply to people who are trying to rid themselves of anxieties and other disorders ). > > As far as the group here, I believe it consists mostly of ACT-users, with some therapists and the founder watching the postings. But given that people who use ACT have read other things and ACT is not an island of knowledge.....many other concepts get in the mix. > > B/Regards > ibrahim I still have no idea which writer you presume is in which state, Ibrahim! I was reacting to one line of thought that i am not sure represents the whole of someone's thinking and I know my line of thought was just a reaction to a line of thought. I think my reaction probably is to assumptions being made. I do have a bit of a thing about that as throughout my life a lot of assumptions have been made about me, how I am feeling or even worse how I ought to be feeling. My mother required total agreement with everything she said and also wanted to control everyone's feelings. She expected us to fall in line with her rules and feel and think the way she determined was right and suited her. She still does at 96 and I'm only just beginning to find out that others were also disturbed by her assumptions about how people should react. So my reaction was to withdraw and keep all my feelings and thoughts locked up inside myself which is why I thought I was the only one who was bothered by her. Cutting yourself off from others is not a good idea. Connecting is important to me, which is one of the reasons I responded to this thread, in my own personal way. So I think maybe that philosphical views are best presented as options that may suit some and not others then I feel OK with them. Otherwise I am happy to have them presented as relatively generalisable if they are based on research. I always personally react better to advice or suggestions that contain a sprinkling of perhpas, maybe or if you think this way then.... I was not only given a theoretical situation (the fairy one) but also told how I would respond to that question. That just seemed plain odd to me! Where's the evidence is my first question. But there you see, having condemned myself to a life of silence and holding my thoughts and feelings in as that was how I learnt to avoid criticism and attacks and being told to be careful or I would turn out " mad like my father " a myth I accepted when I was small, I have a lot of self-expression to catch up on! My present is my whole being which includes all my past: good, bad and indifferent moments. But as my father always used to say (dear Dad!) Don't let it get you down! I try my best not to and much of the time I manage<smile> Take care, Louise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Louise, you are so right in saying that we all react differently to messages; that is what makes for lively discussion and learning A tool that works for one may not work for someone else, but I do want to hear about other's tools so I can pick it up for my own use -- or not. I do not assume that everyone places too much weight on their memories and the alternative is to attach "no" importance to history (if I read you right). I just know that I do, but I don't want my memories or history to be erased or to not matter. It is just good advice to myself to carry my memories more lightly. Perhaps that concept would be helpful to others, perhaps not. I wouldn't want to be "told" by someone, either, that time will erase all moments--implying "so why worry-nothing matters anyway?" I don't think that was the point was making and it is not how I interpreted it. It is not about "telling" yourself that as an aid to living in the present moment; it's just that holding it in awareness MAY help some people to live in the moment more easily. The example he used about being told you were happy ten years and ago and that knowing that wouldn't matter to you in the present was just a story to illustrate his point--and it didn't really work for me, either so I just skipped over it to focus on the point he was making: time will erase all moments. He further said that, eventually, nothing would matter; some might disagree with that--you can agree or not. Keep in mind that one person's interpretation of "to matter" may differ from another's. It works for me to hold the idea of impermanence in my awareness because I think I do place too much weight and importance on my memories and on my past. I often ask myself, when deeply distressed about something, if it will matter to me when I am on my death bed. Most often, it won't, so I can then breathe a little easier, put my distress in perspective, and get on with moving toward my values in the moment. I am glad that we are all different and can learn from each other, but we don't even HAVE to. We can just let it be what it is Helena To: ACT_for_the_Public From: knitlou@...Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:57:33 +0000Subject: Re: Impermanence and Letting Go >> Maybe I'm the one out in left field, but I totally get what is saying and what he is not saying. He is not saying that to live in the moment, it's a good idea to tell yourself and others that everything will be wiped out, so what does anything matter, anyway. He is just pointing out the fundamental truth that time will erase all moments and memories -- and to be aware of this could make living in the moment less worrisome as we realize that the current moment is all we really have. So why attach so much importance and weight to our memories? No, don't get rid of them! Just carry them with you lightly. > > That's what I get, and I don't understand the counter critique. But am enjoying reading it all!> > HelenaWe are all different, Helena. We all react differently to being told time will erase all moments. I don't feel that it helps me live in the moment to be told that but others will. Your question Why attach so much imposrtance and weight to our memories? is a good one but it also seems to assume that everyone does and therefore the answer is to attach *no* importance to history. The message didn't come across to me as a light message, quite the opposite<smile>But again I think it proves that we all come to messages and react to them in the light of our own personal history!!! So it appears that giving advice to someone that the moment is erased is contraversial as until they are living life as if their past moments have been wiped out they will come to every new idea with their own personal perspective anyway or what some might call baggage<smile>You would believe it but as I write I am aware that someone on TV is talking about a friend who was mildly depressed being put into a home where all the residents were suffering from Alzheimers and the negative effect it had on her!Louise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 <<<How this relates to what you were writing: Whether the memories are destroyed or simply not accessible, Alzheimer's sufferers can't access that knowledge anymore. Their lives are, as best as we can tell, a disjointed series of moments, like beads on a string that has come undone. It seems that our ability to live functionally and carry out our intentions in the present depends upon our being able to remember the past, doesn't it? As well, it depends upon our being able to be aware of the future, even though we do not know what it consists of. As humans, we engage in the present in a context of both past and future.>>> Absolutely. But no one is saying that we would be better off without memories, or without thoughts of the future. It goes without saying that we need those things to function effectively in the world. We also need language, words, thoughts, images, thinking, analysis, the mind--even though our *relationship* to those things often contributes to our problems. <<<However, I question your use of the term that one day, what is now present will " not matter " . In order for something to " not matter " it has to not have an impact. (I'd also point out that if you want to stay present focused, you could also argue that the fact that 100 years hence something would supposedly " not matter " doesn't matter, so to speak, right now: in the present one's suffering certainly does impact the person undergoing it, may impact others, and that impact may " matter " to anyone who has compassion for those involved.)>>> When I say that something " matters " or " doesn't matter " , I'm speaking conventionally, not absolutely. Whether or not something " matters " is not a question that can have an absolute, objective answer. Matters to who? We have to specify. 1,000 years ago, in a castle somewhere in Europe, a man cheated on his wife, causing her great emotional pain. Does that matter? Well, it obviously mattered to her at the time. But it doesn't matter much to anyone now, or at least it didn't matter until it got randomly introduced into this discussion. " Mattering " is in the mind of the beholder. Things that matter to me now might not matter to me later, and vice versa. Things that matter to me, might not matter to you, and vice versa. Some things matter to both of us. Some things matter to neither of us. That's all that we can really say as far as " mattering " is concerned. Now, contemplating what I just said can create a ripple of reactions in the mind. " Oh no, you mean that what matters to me—this suffering that I am trying to get through—doesn't matter to anyone else? I guess it doesn't. Life is hopeless. " But that's just the mind train going off again, leaping to conclusions that aren't necessarily true. <<<The past is no more, true. But the consequences of past actions are most certainly present in the here and now. And our present actions will certainly impact the future.>>> OK, so we should take good, wise, prudent, responsible actions. Notice, however, that in order to take those actions, we don't have to embrace the questionable idea that what we do is *eternally* important. I would suggest that at least in some cases, embracing that idea adds unnecessary pressure to the situation, making effective actions and responses to situations more difficult. When something matters to us, we struggle for it, we strive for it, we fight for it, we seek it out, as we should. As we should. The point is that this process can easily become overwhelming. It can easily make things heavy, weighty, momentous, pressured, all-or-nothing. The question is this. What happens when we step back, and take the larger perspective, the perspective that is not trapped in *this* instant of my life right here, whatever is going on in that instant, the perspective that sees it not only arising, but ALSO fading away for eternity, as we can say, FOR A FACT, that it will do. Does it become lighter? Easier to work with? Easier to cope with? Easier to endure? Easier to get through, particularly when it is unpleasant? Does it relax us, calm us down a bit, maybe give us a bit of mental space in which to work, so that we can deal with it in a wiser manner, and possibly take more effective actions in response to it? For me, the answer is yes. " If I don't find a way to fix this problem of mine, look at all the wonderful happiness I will lose! " But you will lose it to time anyway! Can't you see that? The stakes are not as high as you think. So why get so wrapped up? Maybe you can just let go, take whatever things come, however they happen to come. You don't have to worry, they will equalize on their own. There will come a time—soon, in the grand scheme of things—when the differences between them will not make much of a difference any more. I'm offering this perspective for others to gently play around with, just to see what happens. If the perspective doesn't " do it " for you, if it doesn't help, that's fine. Just put it aside and take whatever does work ;-) Best wishes, -- > > > > > > > > > > Think back to some time in the past, say 10 years ago. > > > > > > > > > > What was the quality of your life at the time? Was it good? Was it bad? > > > > > > > > > > How were you feeling? Were you happy? Were you depressed? Were you excited? Were you anxious? Were you energized? Were you overwhelmed? > > > > > > > > > > What was going on in your mental world? What sorts of things occupied your mental day-to-day? > > > > > > > > > > Let's say that you were in pain, suffering over some unwanted state of affairs. Maybe a failed romance, or a career disappointment, or a psychological struggle, or some other problem. You were unhappy. > > > > > > > > > > Would it help if God, or the white queen, or whoever, were to say, > > > > > > > > > > " You know what, I'm going to change that. I'm going to change how you were feeling at that time. I'm going to erase the pain that you were experiencing and replace it with the highest form of happiness imaginable. By the stroke of a magic wand, it is now officially true that ten years ago, you were on top of the world. " > > > > > > > > > > How would you respond? Would this gift be good news, would it be a cause for celebration? > > > > > > > > > > " How wonderful that it is now true that I was on top of the world 10 years ago. Let's celebrate this joyous news! " > > > > > > > > > > Is that how you would respond? > > > > > > > > > > No. You don't care. How you were feeling then doesn't matter anymore. The moment that existed 10 years ago, whatever it entailed experientially, came and went. Now, it's gone, empty, nothing. How it felt is not even a concern: for all we care, it might as well have never happened. > > > > > > > > > > Now, here comes the important point. > > > > > > > > > > If we look closely, we will notice that this right here--this moment of our lives right now, this happiness, this sadness, this boredom, this joy, this suffering, this victory, this loss, whatever it is that occupies us so heavily--it will soon be like that: gone, empty, nothing. > > > > > > > > > > Whether it ever happened will make no difference in the grand scheme of things. It will only exist in those who can still remember it, and even then, it won't be able to *satisfy* anyone or anything. > > > > > > > > > > Why, then, should we dwell on it, or fixate on it, or lament over it, or cling to it, or fight with it, or struggle with it? Regardless of what we do with it, it goes to the same place that every prior moment of our lives, whether good or bad, has gone, and it goes there quickly, before we can even notice. > > > > > > > > > > When we perceive the events of our lives in this light, they cease to be so important, so heavy, so weighty. They lose their tight grip on us. We can let go of our expectations and our demands for how they will unfold, because we know that no matter how they do unfold, it is only a very small amount of time--indeed, an instant--until they unfold into nonexistence, a permanent state of didn't-matter-anyway. > > > > > > > > > > Contemplating this fact inclines me to relax, to realize that nothing is really really that big of a deal. It becomes easier for me to let go of my frustration and sorrow at the fact that this life of mine doesn't seem to want to follow my wishes. > > > > > > > > > > Now, I expect that some will read what I am saying and think that it is a nihilistic, depressed, bleak take on life. The mind sees that its own states are constantly fleeting, and it naturally says " Oh no, how sad, how terrible, how tragic! " > > > > > > > > > > But that's just another reaction of the mind. It's not privileged, it's just an interpretation. > > > > > > > > > > Does the fact that all things in life eventually fade away mean that we should quit engaging with life? No, I don't think so. I think it means that we should engage with life *without* getting caught up in the unhelpful attachments of our minds. Seeing that the objects of those attachments are intrinsically fleeting, we should shift our focus towards just doing what needs to be done, doing our business, fulfilling our responsibilities, living out our values, and so on, without holding onto anticipations, demands, expectations, evaluations, comparisons, and so on--those 'extra' things the mind adds that tend to bring us so much suffering. We do what needs to be done, what is right and good to do, and we leave the situation at that. > > > > > > > > > > To summarize, then, here is what I take from the idea of impermanence. When you find yourself in a struggle with this moment of life, suffering over the fact that it is not what you want it to be, remember that the wheels of time, in their constant movement, just erased it, for all of eternity. They just erased it. It's gone. They will continue to erase anything and everything that comes up after. Time brings everything to a point where it didn't matter anyway. So relax, let go, and just be. The struggle is a waste of time. > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > > > I don't get how believing that every moment is erased helps anyone as it is not the way humans are made. We have memories. Yes, they cause pain but they are also part of what makes us human and helps us survive. We'd not survive as a species if we had no memory of pain. > > > > > > > > It doesn't help me survive personally to tell myself that my existence consists of a series of disconnected moments that are erased serially! > > > > > > > > I agree that it would be pointless to wish for a happiness fairy to tell me I was blissfully happy ten years ago. But if I had been happy ten years ago that would have affected the course of my life so no I wouldn't say I don't care. I would say that it is pointless trying to change what has happened. i wouldn't say it is pointless rying to learn from my past though. > > > > > > > > There is surely a difference between living in the moment and pretending we have no history? > > > > > > > > Louise > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Louise, I now have such a better idea of what makes you tick, so to speak! Thanks for opening up and letting us know how your mother always wanted to control your feelings and make you " fall in line " with her rules. That goes a long way in explaining why you would not want anyone to make any assumptions about you or tell you how you should feel or react. My experience as a toddler was the opposite -- I had no shaping and was just allowed to roam free, sometimes with no clothes on outside, etc. Hardly any attention was paid to me at all. Then when I ended up in my strict " spare the rod and spoil the child " Mennonite foster home at age eight, where is was all about rules and not making a single misstep (like being one minute late), I felt choked and terrified that I would inadvertently do something wrong. I was sure I was going to hell! Anyway, my point is, we all do have our unique stories and histories which shape us and influence how we react to others. We may even over-react to others sometimes because of our particular triggers; I know I do. Thanks for sharing that information about your early years (sounds like it's still going on with your mom at 96--wow!) It does shine a light on how you came to be the unique person you are. A person I happen to like a lot. My best, Helena >>>>>>> I think my reaction probably is to assumptions being made. I do have a bit of a thing about that as throughout my life a lot of assumptions have been made about me, how I am feeling or even worse how I ought to be feeling. My mother required total agreement with everything she said and also wanted to control everyone's feelings. She expected us to fall in line with her rules and feel and think the way she determined was right and suited her. She still does at 96 and I'm only just beginning to find out that others were also disturbed by her assumptions about how people should react. So my reaction was to withdraw and keep all my feelings and thoughts locked up inside myself which is why I thought I was the only one who was bothered by her. Cutting yourself off from others is not a good idea. Connecting is important to me, which is one of the reasons I responded to this thread, in my own personal way. So I think maybe that philosphical views are best presented as options that may suit some and not others then I feel OK with them. Otherwise I am happy to have them presented as relatively generalisable if they are based on research. I always personally react better to advice or suggestions that contain a sprinkling of perhpas, maybe or if you think this way then.... I was not only given a theoretical situation (the fairy one) but also told how I would respond to that question. That just seemed plain odd to me! Where's the evidence is my first question. But there you see, having condemned myself to a life of silence and holding my thoughts and feelings in as that was how I learnt to avoid criticism and attacks and being told to be careful or I would turn out " mad like my father " a myth I accepted when I was small, I have a lot of self-expression to catch up on! My present is my whole being which includes all my past: good, bad and indifferent moments. But as my father always used to say (dear Dad!) Don't let it get you down! I try my best not to and much of the time I manage<smile> Take care, Louise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 I'm with you Helena, I understand what is saying the same way as you do > > > > > > > > Think back to some time in the past, say 10 years ago. > > > > > > > > What was the quality of your life at the time? Was it good? Was it bad? > > > > > > > > How were you feeling? Were you happy? Were you depressed? Were you excited? Were you anxious? Were you energized? Were you overwhelmed? > > > > > > > > What was going on in your mental world? What sorts of things occupied your mental day-to-day? > > > > > > > > Let's say that you were in pain, suffering over some unwanted state of affairs. Maybe a failed romance, or a career disappointment, or a psychological struggle, or some other problem. You were unhappy. > > > > > > > > Would it help if God, or the white queen, or whoever, were to say, > > > > > > > > " You know what, I'm going to change that. I'm going to change how you were feeling at that time. I'm going to erase the pain that you were experiencing and replace it with the highest form of happiness imaginable. By the stroke of a magic wand, it is now officially true that ten years ago, you were on top of the world. " > > > > > > > > How would you respond? Would this gift be good news, would it be a cause for celebration? > > > > > > > > " How wonderful that it is now true that I was on top of the world 10 years ago. Let's celebrate this joyous news! " > > > > > > > > Is that how you would respond? > > > > > > > > No. You don't care. How you were feeling then doesn't matter anymore. The moment that existed 10 years ago, whatever it entailed experientially, came and went. Now, it's gone, empty, nothing. How it felt is not even a concern: for all we care, it might as well have never happened. > > > > > > > > Now, here comes the important point. > > > > > > > > If we look closely, we will notice that this right here--this moment of our lives right now, this happiness, this sadness, this boredom, this joy, this suffering, this victory, this loss, whatever it is that occupies us so heavily--it will soon be like that: gone, empty, nothing. > > > > > > > > Whether it ever happened will make no difference in the grand scheme of things. It will only exist in those who can still remember it, and even then, it won't be able to *satisfy* anyone or anything. > > > > > > > > Why, then, should we dwell on it, or fixate on it, or lament over it, or cling to it, or fight with it, or struggle with it? Regardless of what we do with it, it goes to the same place that every prior moment of our lives, whether good or bad, has gone, and it goes there quickly, before we can even notice. > > > > > > > > When we perceive the events of our lives in this light, they cease to be so important, so heavy, so weighty. They lose their tight grip on us. We can let go of our expectations and our demands for how they will unfold, because we know that no matter how they do unfold, it is only a very small amount of time--indeed, an instant--until they unfold into nonexistence, a permanent state of didn't-matter- anyway. > > > > > > > > Contemplating this fact inclines me to relax, to realize that nothing is really really that big of a deal. It becomes easier for me to let go of my frustration and sorrow at the fact that this life of mine doesn't seem to want to follow my wishes. > > > > > > > > Now, I expect that some will read what I am saying and think that it is a nihilistic, depressed, bleak take on life. The mind sees that its own states are constantly fleeting, and it naturally says " Oh no, how sad, how terrible, how tragic! " > > > > > > > > But that's just another reaction of the mind. It's not privileged, it's just an interpretation. > > > > > > > > Does the fact that all things in life eventually fade away mean that we should quit engaging with life? No, I don't think so. I think it means that we should engage with life *without* getting caught up in the unhelpful attachments of our minds. Seeing that the objects of those attachments are intrinsically fleeting, we should shift our focus towards just doing what needs to be done, doing our business, fulfilling our responsibilities, living out our values, and so on, without holding onto anticipations, demands, expectations, evaluations, comparisons, and so on--those 'extra' things the mind adds that tend to bring us so much suffering. We do what needs to be done, what is right and good to do, and we leave the situation at that. > > > > > > > > To summarize, then, here is what I take from the idea of impermanence. When you find yourself in a struggle with this moment of life, suffering over the fact that it is not what you want it to be, remember that the wheels of time, in their constant movement, just erased it, for all of eternity. They just erased it. It's gone. They will continue to erase anything and everything that comes up after. Time brings everything to a point where it didn't matter anyway. So relax, let go, and just be. The struggle is a waste of time. > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > -- > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > I don't get how believing that every moment is erased helps anyone as it is not the way humans are made. We have memories. Yes, they cause pain but they are also part of what makes us human and helps us survive. We'd not survive as a species if we had no memory of pain. > > > > > > It doesn't help me survive personally to tell myself that my existence consists of a series of disconnected moments that are erased serially! > > > > > > I agree that it would be pointless to wish for a happiness fairy to tell me I was blissfully happy ten years ago. But if I had been happy ten years ago that would have affected the course of my life so no I wouldn't say I don't care. I would say that it is pointless trying to change what has happened. i wouldn't say it is pointless rying to learn from my past though. > > > > > > There is surely a difference between living in the moment and pretending we have no history? > > > > > > Louise > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Thanks for saying that, Birgit. Also, I wanted to respond to a recent post from you where you said something like you didn't experience as painful a childhood as I did ... or something like that. Birgit, I don't think anyone could really know that because pain is so subjective and we really can't know how badly anyone has been wounded by looking at the outside events that are responsible. So just because my stories may sound more horrible than yours doesn't mean you suffered any less! Just wanted to share that with you. Helena Re: Impermanence and Letting Go I'm with you Helena, I understand what is saying the same way as you do> > > >> > > > Think back to some time in the past, say 10 years ago. > > > > > > > > What was the quality of your life at the time? Was it good? Was it bad? > > > > > > > > How were you feeling? Were you happy? Were you depressed? Were you excited? Were you anxious? Were you energized? Were you overwhelmed? > > > > > > > > What was going on in your mental world? What sorts of things occupied your mental day-to-day? > > > > > > > > Let's say that you were in pain, suffering over some unwanted state of affairs. Maybe a failed romance, or a career disappointment, or a psychological struggle, or some other problem. You were unhappy. > > > > > > > > Would it help if God, or the white queen, or whoever, were to say, > > > > > > > > "You know what, I'm going to change that. I'm going to change how you were feeling at that time. I'm going to erase the pain that you were experiencing and replace it with the highest form of happiness imaginable. By the stroke of a magic wand, it is now officially true that ten years ago, you were on top of the world." > > > > > > > > How would you respond? Would this gift be good news, would it be a cause for celebration? > > > > > > > > "How wonderful that it is now true that I was on top of the world 10 years ago. Let's celebrate this joyous news!" > > > > > > > > Is that how you would respond? > > > > > > > > No. You don't care. How you were feeling then doesn't matter anymore. The moment that existed 10 years ago, whatever it entailed experientially, came and went. Now, it's gone, empty, nothing. How it felt is not even a concern: for all we care, it might as well have never happened. > > > > > > > > Now, here comes the important point. > > > > > > > > If we look closely, we will notice that this right here--this moment of our lives right now, this happiness, this sadness, this boredom, this joy, this suffering, this victory, this loss, whatever it is that occupies us so heavily--it will soon be like that: gone, empty, nothing. > > > > > > > > Whether it ever happened will make no difference in the grand scheme of things. It will only exist in those who can still remember it, and even then, it won't be able to *satisfy* anyone or anything. > > > > > > > > Why, then, should we dwell on it, or fixate on it, or lament over it, or cling to it, or fight with it, or struggle with it? Regardless of what we do with it, it goes to the same place that every prior moment of our lives, whether good or bad, has gone, and it goes there quickly, before we can even notice. > > > > > > > > When we perceive the events of our lives in this light, they cease to be so important, so heavy, so weighty. They lose their tight grip on us. We can let go of our expectations and our demands for how they will unfold, because we know that no matter how they do unfold, it is only a very small amount of time--indeed, an instant--until they unfold into nonexistence, a permanent state of didn't-matter- anyway. > > > > > > > > Contemplating this fact inclines me to relax, to realize that nothing is really really that big of a deal. It becomes easier for me to let go of my frustration and sorrow at the fact that this life of mine doesn't seem to want to follow my wishes. > > > > > > > > Now, I expect that some will read what I am saying and think that it is a nihilistic, depressed, bleak take on life. The mind sees that its own states are constantly fleeting, and it naturally says "Oh no, how sad, how terrible, how tragic!" > > > > > > > > But that's just another reaction of the mind. It's not privileged, it's just an interpretation. > > > > > > > > Does the fact that all things in life eventually fade away mean that we should quit engaging with life? No, I don't think so. I think it means that we should engage with life *without* getting caught up in the unhelpful attachments of our minds. Seeing that the objects of those attachments are intrinsically fleeting, we should shift our focus towards just doing what needs to be done, doing our business, fulfilling our responsibilities, living out our values, and so on, without holding onto anticipations, demands, expectations, evaluations, comparisons, and so on--those 'extra' things the mind adds that tend to bring us so much suffering. We do what needs to be done, what is right and good to do, and we leave the situation at that. > > > > > > > > To summarize, then, here is what I take from the idea of impermanence. When you find yourself in a struggle with this moment of life, suffering over the fact that it is not what you want it to be, remember that the wheels of time, in their constant movement, just erased it, for all of eternity. They just erased it. It's gone. They will continue to erase anything and everything that comes up after. Time brings everything to a point where it didn't matter anyway. So relax, let go, and just be. The struggle is a waste of time. > > > > > > > > Best wishes,> > > > --> > > > > > Hi ,> > > > > > I don't get how believing that every moment is erased helps anyone as it is not the way humans are made. We have memories. Yes, they cause pain but they are also part of what makes us human and helps us survive. We'd not survive as a species if we had no memory of pain.> > > > > > It doesn't help me survive personally to tell myself that my existence consists of a series of disconnected moments that are erased serially! > > > > > > I agree that it would be pointless to wish for a happiness fairy to tell me I was blissfully happy ten years ago. But if I had been happy ten years ago that would have affected the course of my life so no I wouldn't say I don't care. I would say that it is pointless trying to change what has happened. i wouldn't say it is pointless rying to learn from my past though.> > > > > > There is surely a difference between living in the moment and pretending we have no history?> > > > > > Louise> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Hi , No question that if saying " it doesn't matter " works for you to help you act wisely in the moment, then by all means use it. I appreciate your acknowledgement of that. As a gentle aside, it would probably help if rather than writing " it calms US down " you were to instead write " it calms ME down " . What calms you down most certainly doesn't calm ME down! Also, don't make assumptions what I do or don't let go of, etc. etc. etc. I won't bore you with my life story but let's just that say that I've got some decades of experience with letting go and welcoming what comes. I'm not exactly someone untried by dealing with the interesting turns that life takes. All the best, Les -- In ACT_for_the_Public , " Parks " wrote: > > <<<How this relates to what you were writing: Whether the memories are destroyed or simply not accessible, Alzheimer's sufferers can't access that knowledge anymore. Their lives are, as best as we can tell, a disjointed series of moments, like beads on a string that has come undone. It seems that our ability to live functionally and carry out our intentions in the present depends upon our being able to remember the past, doesn't it? As well, it depends upon our being able to be aware of the future, even though we do not know what it consists of. As humans, we engage in the present in a context of both past and future.>>> > > Absolutely. But no one is saying that we would be better off without memories, or without thoughts of the future. It goes without saying that we need those things to function effectively in the world. We also need language, words, thoughts, images, thinking, analysis, the mind--even though our *relationship* to those things often contributes to our problems. > > <<<However, I question your use of the term that one day, what is now present will " not matter " . In order for something to " not matter " it has to not have an impact. (I'd also point out that if you want to stay present focused, you could also argue that the fact that 100 years hence something would supposedly " not matter " doesn't matter, so to speak, right now: in the present one's suffering certainly does impact the person undergoing it, may impact others, and that impact may " matter " to anyone who has compassion for those involved.)>>> > > When I say that something " matters " or " doesn't matter " , I'm speaking conventionally, not absolutely. > > Whether or not something " matters " is not a question that can have an absolute, objective answer. Matters to who? We have to specify. > > 1,000 years ago, in a castle somewhere in Europe, a man cheated on his wife, causing her great emotional pain. Does that matter? Well, it obviously mattered to her at the time. But it doesn't matter much to anyone now, or at least it didn't matter until it got randomly introduced into this discussion. > > " Mattering " is in the mind of the beholder. Things that matter to me now might not matter to me later, and vice versa. Things that matter to me, might not matter to you, and vice versa. Some things matter to both of us. Some things matter to neither of us. > > That's all that we can really say as far as " mattering " is concerned. > > Now, contemplating what I just said can create a ripple of reactions in the mind. " Oh no, you mean that what matters to me—this suffering that I am trying to get through—doesn't matter to anyone else? I guess it doesn't. Life is hopeless. " > > But that's just the mind train going off again, leaping to conclusions that aren't necessarily true. > > <<<The past is no more, true. But the consequences of past actions are most certainly present in the here and now. And our present actions will certainly impact the future.>>> > > OK, so we should take good, wise, prudent, responsible actions. > > Notice, however, that in order to take those actions, we don't have to embrace the questionable idea that what we do is *eternally* important. I would suggest that at least in some cases, embracing that idea adds unnecessary pressure to the situation, making effective actions and responses to situations more difficult. > > When something matters to us, we struggle for it, we strive for it, we fight for it, we seek it out, as we should. As we should. > > The point is that this process can easily become overwhelming. It can easily make things heavy, weighty, momentous, pressured, all-or-nothing. > > The question is this. > > What happens when we step back, and take the larger perspective, the perspective that is not trapped in *this* instant of my life right here, whatever is going on in that instant, the perspective that sees it not only arising, but ALSO fading away for eternity, as we can say, FOR A FACT, that it will do. > > Does it become lighter? Easier to work with? Easier to cope with? Easier to endure? Easier to get through, particularly when it is unpleasant? > > Does it relax us, calm us down a bit, maybe give us a bit of mental space in which to work, so that we can deal with it in a wiser manner, and possibly take more effective actions in response to it? > > For me, the answer is yes. > > " If I don't find a way to fix this problem of mine, look at all the wonderful happiness I will lose! " > > But you will lose it to time anyway! Can't you see that? The stakes are not as high as you think. So why get so wrapped up? Maybe you can just let go, take whatever things come, however they happen to come. You don't have to worry, they will equalize on their own. There will come a time—soon, in the grand scheme of things—when the differences between them will not make much of a difference any more. > > I'm offering this perspective for others to gently play around with, just to see what happens. > > If the perspective doesn't " do it " for you, if it doesn't help, that's fine. Just put it aside and take whatever does work ;-) > > Best wishes, > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Think back to some time in the past, say 10 years ago. > > > > > > > > > > > > What was the quality of your life at the time? Was it good? Was it bad? > > > > > > > > > > > > How were you feeling? Were you happy? Were you depressed? Were you excited? Were you anxious? Were you energized? Were you overwhelmed? > > > > > > > > > > > > What was going on in your mental world? What sorts of things occupied your mental day-to-day? > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's say that you were in pain, suffering over some unwanted state of affairs. Maybe a failed romance, or a career disappointment, or a psychological struggle, or some other problem. You were unhappy. > > > > > > > > > > > > Would it help if God, or the white queen, or whoever, were to say, > > > > > > > > > > > > " You know what, I'm going to change that. I'm going to change how you were feeling at that time. I'm going to erase the pain that you were experiencing and replace it with the highest form of happiness imaginable. By the stroke of a magic wand, it is now officially true that ten years ago, you were on top of the world. " > > > > > > > > > > > > How would you respond? Would this gift be good news, would it be a cause for celebration? > > > > > > > > > > > > " How wonderful that it is now true that I was on top of the world 10 years ago. Let's celebrate this joyous news! " > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that how you would respond? > > > > > > > > > > > > No. You don't care. How you were feeling then doesn't matter anymore. The moment that existed 10 years ago, whatever it entailed experientially, came and went. Now, it's gone, empty, nothing. How it felt is not even a concern: for all we care, it might as well have never happened. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, here comes the important point. > > > > > > > > > > > > If we look closely, we will notice that this right here--this moment of our lives right now, this happiness, this sadness, this boredom, this joy, this suffering, this victory, this loss, whatever it is that occupies us so heavily--it will soon be like that: gone, empty, nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > Whether it ever happened will make no difference in the grand scheme of things. It will only exist in those who can still remember it, and even then, it won't be able to *satisfy* anyone or anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > Why, then, should we dwell on it, or fixate on it, or lament over it, or cling to it, or fight with it, or struggle with it? Regardless of what we do with it, it goes to the same place that every prior moment of our lives, whether good or bad, has gone, and it goes there quickly, before we can even notice. > > > > > > > > > > > > When we perceive the events of our lives in this light, they cease to be so important, so heavy, so weighty. They lose their tight grip on us. We can let go of our expectations and our demands for how they will unfold, because we know that no matter how they do unfold, it is only a very small amount of time--indeed, an instant--until they unfold into nonexistence, a permanent state of didn't-matter-anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > Contemplating this fact inclines me to relax, to realize that nothing is really really that big of a deal. It becomes easier for me to let go of my frustration and sorrow at the fact that this life of mine doesn't seem to want to follow my wishes. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, I expect that some will read what I am saying and think that it is a nihilistic, depressed, bleak take on life. The mind sees that its own states are constantly fleeting, and it naturally says " Oh no, how sad, how terrible, how tragic! " > > > > > > > > > > > > But that's just another reaction of the mind. It's not privileged, it's just an interpretation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Does the fact that all things in life eventually fade away mean that we should quit engaging with life? No, I don't think so. I think it means that we should engage with life *without* getting caught up in the unhelpful attachments of our minds. Seeing that the objects of those attachments are intrinsically fleeting, we should shift our focus towards just doing what needs to be done, doing our business, fulfilling our responsibilities, living out our values, and so on, without holding onto anticipations, demands, expectations, evaluations, comparisons, and so on--those 'extra' things the mind adds that tend to bring us so much suffering. We do what needs to be done, what is right and good to do, and we leave the situation at that. > > > > > > > > > > > > To summarize, then, here is what I take from the idea of impermanence. When you find yourself in a struggle with this moment of life, suffering over the fact that it is not what you want it to be, remember that the wheels of time, in their constant movement, just erased it, for all of eternity. They just erased it. It's gone. They will continue to erase anything and everything that comes up after. Time brings everything to a point where it didn't matter anyway. So relax, let go, and just be. The struggle is a waste of time. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > > > > > I don't get how believing that every moment is erased helps anyone as it is not the way humans are made. We have memories. Yes, they cause pain but they are also part of what makes us human and helps us survive. We'd not survive as a species if we had no memory of pain. > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't help me survive personally to tell myself that my existence consists of a series of disconnected moments that are erased serially! > > > > > > > > > > I agree that it would be pointless to wish for a happiness fairy to tell me I was blissfully happy ten years ago. But if I had been happy ten years ago that would have affected the course of my life so no I wouldn't say I don't care. I would say that it is pointless trying to change what has happened. i wouldn't say it is pointless rying to learn from my past though. > > > > > > > > > > There is surely a difference between living in the moment and pretending we have no history? > > > > > > > > > > Louise > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Thank You Louise for your open and honest post.....I will be more careful in the future in replies so I do not add confusion.B/RegardsibrahimTo: ACT_for_the_Public Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 7:17:57 AMSubject: Re: Impermanence and Letting Go > > > > No Louise...I am not referring to you or to anyone ( after all who am I to judge anyone ) I am referring to the actual posting that it contains the thought processes of people in two very different states ( thoughts that apply to people that are totally enlightened and have no anxieties , and thoughts that apply to people who are trying to rid themselves of anxieties and other disorders ). > > As far as the group here, I believe it consists mostly of ACT-users, with some therapists and the founder watching the postings. But given that people who use ACT have read other things and ACT is not an island of knowledge... ..many other concepts get in the mix. > > B/Regards > ibrahim I still have no idea which writer you presume is in which state, Ibrahim! I was reacting to one line of thought that i am not sure represents the whole of someone's thinking and I know my line of thought was just a reaction to a line of thought. I think my reaction probably is to assumptions being made. I do have a bit of a thing about that as throughout my life a lot of assumptions have been made about me, how I am feeling or even worse how I ought to be feeling. My mother required total agreement with everything she said and also wanted to control everyone's feelings. She expected us to fall in line with her rules and feel and think the way she determined was right and suited her. She still does at 96 and I'm only just beginning to find out that others were also disturbed by her assumptions about how people should react. So my reaction was to withdraw and keep all my feelings and thoughts locked up inside myself which is why I thought I was the only one who was bothered by her. Cutting yourself off from others is not a good idea. Connecting is important to me, which is one of the reasons I responded to this thread, in my own personal way. So I think maybe that philosphical views are best presented as options that may suit some and not others then I feel OK with them. Otherwise I am happy to have them presented as relatively generalisable if they are based on research. I always personally react better to advice or suggestions that contain a sprinkling of perhpas, maybe or if you think this way then.... I was not only given a theoretical situation (the fairy one) but also told how I would respond to that question. That just seemed plain odd to me! Where's the evidence is my first question. But there you see, having condemned myself to a life of silence and holding my thoughts and feelings in as that was how I learnt to avoid criticism and attacks and being told to be careful or I would turn out "mad like my father" a myth I accepted when I was small, I have a lot of self-expression to catch up on! My present is my whole being which includes all my past: good, bad and indifferent moments. But as my father always used to say (dear Dad!) Don't let it get you down! I try my best not to and much of the time I manage<smile> Take care, Louise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 <<<Also, don't make assumptions what I do or don't let go of, etc. etc. etc. I won't bore you with my life story but let's just that say that I've got some decades of experience with letting go and welcoming what comes. I'm not exactly someone untried by dealing with the interesting turns that life takes.>>> When did this discussion become about what *you* personally do or have experience in? <<<As a gentle aside, it would probably help if rather than writing " it calms US down " you were to instead write " it calms ME down. " >>> Sorry, Lesley, I'm not going to change my style of writing for you. If you find my use of the generic " we " bothersome, then just remind yourself that it isn't meant to refer to everyone. While we're in the business of giving each other " gentle asides " , here's one. If you find the ideas in someone else's post to be discomforting or upsetting or unhelpful or whatever, then *don't* read them. " Delete. " Simple as that. All the best, -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Think back to some time in the past, say 10 years ago. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What was the quality of your life at the time? Was it good? Was it bad? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How were you feeling? Were you happy? Were you depressed? Were you excited? Were you anxious? Were you energized? Were you overwhelmed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What was going on in your mental world? What sorts of things occupied your mental day-to-day? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's say that you were in pain, suffering over some unwanted state of affairs. Maybe a failed romance, or a career disappointment, or a psychological struggle, or some other problem. You were unhappy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would it help if God, or the white queen, or whoever, were to say, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " You know what, I'm going to change that. I'm going to change how you were feeling at that time. I'm going to erase the pain that you were experiencing and replace it with the highest form of happiness imaginable. By the stroke of a magic wand, it is now officially true that ten years ago, you were on top of the world. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How would you respond? Would this gift be good news, would it be a cause for celebration? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " How wonderful that it is now true that I was on top of the world 10 years ago. Let's celebrate this joyous news! " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that how you would respond? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No. You don't care. How you were feeling then doesn't matter anymore. The moment that existed 10 years ago, whatever it entailed experientially, came and went. Now, it's gone, empty, nothing. How it felt is not even a concern: for all we care, it might as well have never happened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, here comes the important point. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we look closely, we will notice that this right here--this moment of our lives right now, this happiness, this sadness, this boredom, this joy, this suffering, this victory, this loss, whatever it is that occupies us so heavily--it will soon be like that: gone, empty, nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whether it ever happened will make no difference in the grand scheme of things. It will only exist in those who can still remember it, and even then, it won't be able to *satisfy* anyone or anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why, then, should we dwell on it, or fixate on it, or lament over it, or cling to it, or fight with it, or struggle with it? Regardless of what we do with it, it goes to the same place that every prior moment of our lives, whether good or bad, has gone, and it goes there quickly, before we can even notice. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When we perceive the events of our lives in this light, they cease to be so important, so heavy, so weighty. They lose their tight grip on us. We can let go of our expectations and our demands for how they will unfold, because we know that no matter how they do unfold, it is only a very small amount of time--indeed, an instant--until they unfold into nonexistence, a permanent state of didn't-matter-anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Contemplating this fact inclines me to relax, to realize that nothing is really really that big of a deal. It becomes easier for me to let go of my frustration and sorrow at the fact that this life of mine doesn't seem to want to follow my wishes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, I expect that some will read what I am saying and think that it is a nihilistic, depressed, bleak take on life. The mind sees that its own states are constantly fleeting, and it naturally says " Oh no, how sad, how terrible, how tragic! " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But that's just another reaction of the mind. It's not privileged, it's just an interpretation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does the fact that all things in life eventually fade away mean that we should quit engaging with life? No, I don't think so. I think it means that we should engage with life *without* getting caught up in the unhelpful attachments of our minds. Seeing that the objects of those attachments are intrinsically fleeting, we should shift our focus towards just doing what needs to be done, doing our business, fulfilling our responsibilities, living out our values, and so on, without holding onto anticipations, demands, expectations, evaluations, comparisons, and so on--those 'extra' things the mind adds that tend to bring us so much suffering. We do what needs to be done, what is right and good to do, and we leave the situation at that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To summarize, then, here is what I take from the idea of impermanence. When you find yourself in a struggle with this moment of life, suffering over the fact that it is not what you want it to be, remember that the wheels of time, in their constant movement, just erased it, for all of eternity. They just erased it. It's gone. They will continue to erase anything and everything that comes up after. Time brings everything to a point where it didn't matter anyway. So relax, let go, and just be. The struggle is a waste of time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't get how believing that every moment is erased helps anyone as it is not the way humans are made. We have memories. Yes, they cause pain but they are also part of what makes us human and helps us survive. We'd not survive as a species if we had no memory of pain. > > > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't help me survive personally to tell myself that my existence consists of a series of disconnected moments that are erased serially! > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree that it would be pointless to wish for a happiness fairy to tell me I was blissfully happy ten years ago. But if I had been happy ten years ago that would have affected the course of my life so no I wouldn't say I don't care. I would say that it is pointless trying to change what has happened. i wouldn't say it is pointless rying to learn from my past though. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is surely a difference between living in the moment and pretending we have no history? > > > > > > > > > > > > Louise > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Hi, I just wanted to bring up my thoughts on impermanence. I have followed some Buddhism and found it very helpful. Buddhism for me and what I have read on it, it is about the middle way. Impermanence gives me alot of comfort.. The middle way is comforting. I tend to go extreme and the middle way is very helpful to think about. Many of the Buddhist principles are comforting and helpful for anxiety. There is no need to think too much on it. I just take what helps and leave the rest. There are no shoulds. Everyone is different and there is no absolute for anyone. I find impermanence a very comforting concept. Parks wrote: <<<Of course they live on in memory what do you mean when you say "Time continuously erases my experiences from existence." I just cannot get my head around why it helps me to think that or what it means anyway.>>> I mean that our experiences here--good and bad--are temporal, they don't last. For that matter, nothing in the universe lasts. Now, I'm not saying that we should believe this because it's going to help us. That would be a phony approach. We should believe it because it's incontrovertibly true. There's no escaping it. A common reaction to the fact of impermanence is to perceive it as negative, nihilistic, tragic. The point of my original post was to show that it doesn't have to be perceived in that way. It can actually make life lighter, more flexible, easier to work with. We don't get as caught up in things when we realize that they fade away regardless. <<<I am just curious about whether this is all standard ACT thinking?Or is it just a way of thinking about life you find helpful and I for some reason can't relate to. That's OK. I'm not trying to be argumentative but I just seem to feel this is going beyond what I feel is helpful and indeed does seem nihilistic to me.>>> It's not standard ACT thinking, so don't feel like you have to fall in line or anything like that. If it doesn't help you get through your journey, kick it to the curb ;-) It's actually connected to Buddhism. A lot of people find Buddhism to be a nihilistic belief system. So, you aren't alone. I offer it because it represents an interesting perspective on things that some might find helpful. <<<I just don't feel the need to tell myself everything is impermanent to be healthy as I see it. That seems to be doing exactly what I have been taught not to do in CBT. Replace an unpleasant thought with a "comforting" one.>>> I'm not saying that people should suppress or replace their thoughts, or believe things because it feels good, or tell themselves things they don't actually know to be true, as in "I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggonit, people like me!", or any other silliness that one might find in a primitive form of CBT. That doesn't work. What I am saying is this. We have an undeniable fact of life right in front of us that we tend to ignore--the fact that all of our experiences, no matter how good or bad, eventually fade away into a state of unimportance. What happens when we bring our attention to that fact? At least for some us, I think the answer is that we become more inclined to relax, to let go, to take whatever comes, without getting too wrapped up in whether or not it conforms to our wishes. For the purposes of dealing with psychological struggles, that's a really good aproach. > > > > <<<I don't get how believing that every moment is erased helps anyone as it is not the way that humans are made.>>> > > > > What makes you think that living in accordance with "the way humans are made" is a good idea? It may be a good idea, but it may also be a bad idea. To find out, we have to look and see. > > What makes you think that I think that? Why does it have to be a good idea or a bad idea? Why do we need to analyse at all? Isn't is just a fact we need to accept, good or bad? > > > > > Remember, evolution is what made us. It doesn't care one iota about anyone's suffering. The only thing that it cares about is whether genes survive into the next generation. If a given psychological tendency increases the statistical likelihood of that happening, then evolution will select for it, even if the tendency causes incredible pain and misery. > > > > Let me give an example. As human beings, we are naturally inclined to be concerned about how we appear physically. The evolutionary logic for this concern is obvious: how we appear physically affects the extent to which we successfully attract mates, and therefore the extent to which we reproduce. > > > Well as I understand it humans are affected by things like waist hip ratio when choosing a mate without necessarily realising that they are. It doesn't necessarily mean that everyone obsesses about their appearance. Much of these evolutionary forces operate without our being conscious, at least until people started studying evolution and evo psych. > > > > Now, the tendency to care deeply about how we appear physically works great for those who are attractive, healthy, fit, and so on. They can "get inside" the head space of beauty, get absorbed in the quest to look good, and be just fine--at least until they get old and start losing it all. > > > > But what about those who are not attractive, healthy, fit, and so on? What about the teenager who is overweight, ugly, different in some way? She has the same tendency to care about how she looks as the rest. So she suffers. Evolution doesn't care that she suffers. It designed human beings to be concerned about physical appearances knowing full well that those who don't fit the mold would suffer as a result. > > > > > > Now, if it were possible to somehow break down her notion that her physical appearance is important in a special, privileged way, would that be a good thing? I certainly would think so. Wouldn't you? If she doesn't get absorbed in the futile quest to look good, or to fit some stupid, externally-imposed mold, if she can let go of the artificial standards that genes and culture inject into human thinking, then she won't suffer as much at the thought "I'm not pretty like the other girls are!" She might come to the enlightened realization, "Great. And why do I have to care?" > > > > This connects to what I was saying in the previous post. As human beings, we are naturally inclined to get completely absorbed in how things are going. We get into a deep struggle with life to find our little chunk of happiness--that perfect relationship, that perfect family, that perfect achievement, that perfect set of warm, happy, worthwhile, delicious life experiences, whatever--and when it doesn't happen, we suffer all the more. Even worse, we compare our unwanted situations to those of other people for whom perfect things do seem to happen, and it hurts. We get frustrated, angry, depressed, and sad that for some reason our lives--the only lives we will ever have--are refusing to measure up to our hopes and expectations. > > > > If something could demonstrate to us that that these things that we seek so dearly are fleeting anyway, that in the end all mental states and experiences--happy, sad, good, bad, anxious, depressed, excited, joyous, warm, delicious, awful--quickly dissolve away, as if they had never happened at all, might that not be a good thing, something that loosens us up a bit, something that gives us a bit more freedom and space and wisdom and perspective through which to cope with life's difficulties and frustrations? > > > > For me, yes. > > It does not have that effect on me at all but we are all individuals. > > I am just curious about whether this is all standard ACT thinking? Or is it just a way of thinking about life you find helpful and I for some reason can't relate to. That's OK. I'm not trying to be argumentative but I just seem to feel this is going beyond what I feel is helpful and indeed does seem nihilistic to me. I just don't feel the need to tell myself everything is impermanent to be healthy as I see it. That seems to be doing exactly what I have been taught not to do in CBT. Replace an unpleasant thought with a "comforting" one. In other words rather than saying my past is something I will never get over to say that nothing has any significance as it is ephemeral seems unnecessary. > > > > <<<It doesn't help me survive personally to tell myself that my existence consists of a series of disconnected moments that are erased serially!>>> > > > > If it doesn't help you, then don't tell yourself that. Tell yourself whatever works for you, whatever you can believe. > > > > But I assure you that if you look closely at your experiences, you will see that time continually erases them from existence. They only live on in the world of memory, where they cannot satisfy anything. > > I don't understand the point you are making here. Of course they live on in memory what do you mean when you say "Time continuously erases my experiences from existence". I just cannot get my head around why it helps me to think that or what it means anyway. I don't think I have ever imagined experiences can live on except in my head. Some of them still affect me today in bad or good ways because I have the capacity to remember and because some of them have actually changed me. Reading your e-mails will have changed me. Reading books changes me. > > > > <<<I agree that it would be pointless to wish for a happiness fairy to tell me I was blissfully happy ten years ago.>>> > > > > But why would it be pointless? > > It would be pointless because I don't believe in magic. > > >If mental states--what makes life sweet and delicious--really do have enduring value, then it would be wonderful news to hear that life was a fairy tale for you 10 years ago. > > I don't believe mental states never change and I don't think that is something I have ever believed. They change all the time but they can be affected by our past experiences, memories etc. and that's just a fact. Telling me that every moment is erased from existence won't change that. Isn't there a middle way though? I neither have to say mental states are immutable or enduring nor that "The moment that existed 10 years ago, whatever it entailed experientially, came and went. Now, it's gone, empty, nothing. How it felt is not even a concern: for all we care, it might as well have never happened." > > > > It's not wonderful news because mental states don't have enduring value. Recognizing that, it becomes easier for us to work with and accept them, particularly when they are unpleasant. They pass, and then it doesn't matter anyway. > > That makes more sense to me :-) > > > > > <<<I wouldn't say it is pointless trying to learn from my past though.>>> > > > > And I didn't say that either. Of course we should learn from our pasts. > > Sorry I'm still a bit confused. Maybe the philosophy is beyond me. > > > > > Best wishes, > > -- > And best wishes from me:-) > > Louise > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 Okay, of course I am having a rough time right now and I have such a hard time with past. My mind always seems to go back to the past when anything happens and of course, it doesn't look for when things were good it looks for the bad. How oh how can I try to change that. 10 years ago shouldn't matter but it does to my mind. I am struggling right now. Thanks so much, Robyn Parks wrote: > > Think back to some time in the past, say 10 years ago. > > What was the quality of your life at the time? Was it good? Was it bad? > > How were you feeling? Were you happy? Were you depressed? Were you > excited? Were you anxious? Were you energized? Were you overwhelmed? > > What was going on in your mental world? What sorts of things occupied > your mental day-to-day? > > Let's say that you were in pain, suffering over some unwanted state of > affairs. Maybe a failed romance, or a career disappointment, or a > psychological struggle, or some other problem. You were unhappy. > > Would it help if God, or the white queen, or whoever, were to say, > > " You know what, I'm going to change that. I'm going to change how you > were feeling at that time. I'm going to erase the pain that you were > experiencing and replace it with the highest form of happiness > imaginable. By the stroke of a magic wand, it is now officially true > that ten years ago, you were on top of the world. " > > How would you respond? Would this gift be good news, would it be a > cause for celebration? > > " How wonderful that it is now true that I was on top of the world 10 > years ago. Let's celebrate this joyous news! " > > Is that how you would respond? > > No. You don't care. How you were feeling then doesn't matter anymore. > The moment that existed 10 years ago, whatever it entailed > experientially, came and went. Now, it's gone, empty, nothing. How it > felt is not even a concern: for all we care, it might as well have > never happened. > > Now, here comes the important point. > > If we look closely, we will notice that this right here--this moment > of our lives right now, this happiness, this sadness, this boredom, > this joy, this suffering, this victory, this loss, whatever it is that > occupies us so heavily--it will soon be like that: gone, empty, nothing. > > Whether it ever happened will make no difference in the grand scheme > of things. It will only exist in those who can still remember it, and > even then, it won't be able to *satisfy* anyone or anything. > > Why, then, should we dwell on it, or fixate on it, or lament over it, > or cling to it, or fight with it, or struggle with it? Regardless of > what we do with it, it goes to the same place that every prior moment > of our lives, whether good or bad, has gone, and it goes there > quickly, before we can even notice. > > When we perceive the events of our lives in this light, they cease to > be so important, so heavy, so weighty. They lose their tight grip on > us. We can let go of our expectations and our demands for how they > will unfold, because we know that no matter how they do unfold, it is > only a very small amount of time--indeed, an instant--until they > unfold into nonexistence, a permanent state of didn't-matter-anyway. > > Contemplating this fact inclines me to relax, to realize that nothing > is really really that big of a deal. It becomes easier for me to let > go of my frustration and sorrow at the fact that this life of mine > doesn't seem to want to follow my wishes. > > Now, I expect that some will read what I am saying and think that it > is a nihilistic, depressed, bleak take on life. The mind sees that its > own states are constantly fleeting, and it naturally says " Oh no, how > sad, how terrible, how tragic! " > > But that's just another reaction of the mind. It's not privileged, > it's just an interpretation. > > Does the fact that all things in life eventually fade away mean that > we should quit engaging with life? No, I don't think so. I think it > means that we should engage with life *without* getting caught up in > the unhelpful attachments of our minds. Seeing that the objects of > those attachments are intrinsically fleeting, we should shift our > focus towards just doing what needs to be done, doing our business, > fulfilling our responsibilities, living out our values, and so on, > without holding onto anticipations, demands, expectations, > evaluations, comparisons, and so on--those 'extra' things the mind > adds that tend to bring us so much suffering. We do what needs to be > done, what is right and good to do, and we leave the situation at that. > > To summarize, then, here is what I take from the idea of impermanence. > When you find yourself in a struggle with this moment of life, > suffering over the fact that it is not what you want it to be, > remember that the wheels of time, in their constant movement, just > erased it, for all of eternity. They just erased it. It's gone. They > will continue to erase anything and everything that comes up after. > Time brings everything to a point where it didn't matter anyway. So > relax, let go, and just be. The struggle is a waste of time. > > Best wishes, > -- > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2009 Report Share Posted March 29, 2009 Hi Helena, Thanks for a really accepting post. I'm very touched. I'm way behind with posting. partly depression, and partly computer trouble. The laptop went away to fix the screen which kept going dead, seemed fixed but the problem is still there and also I was having trouble accessing the group files and losing posts just as I was about to send them. But I think that may be a Yahoogroups thing. Anyway just wanted to say I have appreciated your posts and hope you are feeling better! Louise > > Louise, I now have such a better idea of what makes you tick, so to speak! > Thanks for opening up and letting us know how your mother always wanted to > control your feelings and make you " fall in line " with her rules. That goes > a long way in explaining why you would not want anyone to make any > assumptions about you or tell you how you should feel or react. My > experience as a toddler was the opposite -- I had no shaping and was just > allowed to roam free, sometimes with no clothes on outside, etc. Hardly any > attention was paid to me at all. Then when I ended up in my strict " spare > the rod and spoil the child " Mennonite foster home at age eight, where is > was all about rules and not making a single misstep (like being one minute > late), I felt choked and terrified that I would inadvertently do something > wrong. I was sure I was going to hell! > > Anyway, my point is, we all do have our unique stories and histories which > shape us and influence how we react to others. We may even over-react to > others sometimes because of our particular triggers; I know I do. > > Thanks for sharing that information about your early years (sounds like it's > still going on with your mom at 96--wow!) It does shine a light on how you > came to be the unique person you are. A person I happen to like a lot. > > My best, > Helena > > >>>>>>> > > I think my reaction probably is to assumptions being made. I do have a bit > of a thing about that as throughout my life a lot of assumptions have been > made about me, how I am feeling or even worse how I ought to be feeling. My > mother required total agreement with everything she said and also wanted to > control everyone's feelings. She expected us to fall in line with her rules > and feel and think the way she determined was right and suited her. She > still does at 96 and I'm only just beginning to find out that others were > also disturbed by her assumptions about how people should react. > > So my reaction was to withdraw and keep all my feelings and thoughts locked > up inside myself which is why I thought I was the only one who was bothered > by her. Cutting yourself off from others is not a good idea. Connecting is > important to me, which is one of the reasons I responded to this thread, in > my own personal way. > > So I think maybe that philosphical views are best presented as options that > may suit some and not others then I feel OK with them. Otherwise I am happy > to have them presented as relatively generalisable if they are based on > research. > > I always personally react better to advice or suggestions that contain a > sprinkling of perhpas, maybe or if you think this way then.... I was not > only given a theoretical situation (the fairy one) but also told how I would > respond to that question. That just seemed plain odd to me! Where's the > evidence is my first question. > > But there you see, having condemned myself to a life of silence and holding > my thoughts and feelings in as that was how I learnt to avoid criticism and > attacks and being told to be careful or I would turn out " mad like my > father " a myth I accepted when I was small, I have a lot of self-expression > to catch up on! > > My present is my whole being which includes all my past: good, bad and > indifferent moments. But as my father always used to say (dear Dad!) Don't > let it get you down! I try my best not to and much of the time I > manage<smile> > > Take care, > > Louise > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.